Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Deer Hunting


Reply

Barnes triple shock disappointment

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 10-22-2010, 04:42 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 32
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

i use the barnes TSX in my 308 win. remmy700 and have taken deer from 300 yards to 50 yards and all except one was one shot kills..the one i shot twice was dead and he or i neither knew it.thats why i pumped another one in him..the holes were 1" apart ..i'have never recovered a bullet either except the one i pulled out of a tree when i was sighting in at home ..now it looked like the one in the picture
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-22-2010, 07:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 5
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

I guess it's like any other thing, some can just not work correctly.

Here's my 85gr .243win TSX recovered from a 2x3 Mule Deer after being shot at 25yards, dropped like a ton of bricks.

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2010, 08:29 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Hesperus, CO
Posts: 212
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

As many know, there are success and fail stories regarding Barnes. I recovered a bullet that had passed through a cow elk and dropped her in her tracks at around 300 yards in the snow with my 338-378 ( I was able to follow the blood spray/bullet path in the snow). The bullet looked just like the advertisements say it should. On the other hand, I have a friend who shot a bull elk at 250-300 yards with a 340 Wby that sucked up 6 rounds, and another guy who shot 5 times with a 338-378. These were the original "x" bullets. Not sure if they are that much different than the newer TSXs. As someone else mentioned, until I, personally have a fail, I will use them. I think it revolves around precise shot placement.

On a side note, I also saw first hand a guy shoot a bull elk with a 250 grain Sierra Boat Tail Soft point with a 338 win mag at 200 yards. The recovered bullet had ZERO deformation, and in all seriousness, could have been reloaded again. Explain that one! The only thing I can think of is that it was an old bullet, and the lead became very hard. I can't remember if there was another shot or not that killed the elk. I was so surprised about the recovered bullet that I forgot everything else about the story.
__________________
Fair Chase Hunter
NRA Lifer
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-23-2010, 06:08 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 136
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

These Barnes bullets appear to be the most over rated bullets for their promised performance. I know of and have witnessed very dismal performance on the expansion of these so called big game bullets on our deer here in Australia.
I have three mates who have used these supposed "premium" hunting bullets on Sambar deer (3rd largest deer in the world after Moose and Elk/Wapiti) that max at around 700 pounds. Their shots at Sambar stags were actually filmed as the deer was shot at various ranges from around 80 metres, 210 metres and 370 metres.
In all 3 cases all deer were shot with at least three bullets and needed to be put down as they were either running or kicking. This was not attributed to poor shooting but due to dismal performance and lacklustre expansion of these so called "killer petals" that Barnes bulletts advertises.
I will not talk about the other five stags that ran off wounded and were never found.
These bullets simply perform dismally on the deer we have over here despite all of Barnes' claims.
I for one will never buy these again and nor will I ever recommend them to anyone...not even my worst enemies. FULLSTOP.
Sorry but that is the truth and also my honest opinion of them.

Last edited by ridge rider; 10-23-2010 at 06:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-23-2010, 08:11 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 214
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

I just love it when poeple talk about bullet "failure" because they recovered a bullet that they feel didn't do the job, but they recover the bullet from a dead animal!

A friend of mine uses his target rifle for hunting every year, he uses his match ammunition to hunt with. I have asked him, why don't you use a hunting bullet, and he tells me "It's all about shot placement", he has never lost an animal to this day, he hunts hogs, whitetail, pronghorn, and mule deer.

Don't get me wrong now, I understand that you "wish" the bullet had expanded and dropped the animal in it's tracks, or at least made more damage, but dead is dead.

I myself have shot whitetail deer with 140 TSX out of my 7mm-08 between 100-150 yards, all lung shots, and they either drop right there or they run about 20 yards and collapse. I also shot a mule deer at 365 yards with a 168 TTSX out of my 300 win mag with excellent results.

My dad hunts deer with a .223 using 53 gr. TSX bullets, he has never lost a deer either, but I have seen many poeple at the deer lease lose deer, and they use 300 WSM's and 30-378 Weatherby's! Was it bullet failure, or poor shot placement? I bet if I asked them they would say it was bullet failure!

Now, I'm not accusing anyone of poor shot placement, all I'm saying is that some people will blame the bullet performance and many other things before they blame themselves.

On the other hand, I don't think it matters which bullet you hunt with, at some point you will shoot one that you feel didn't do it's job, none of them have a 100% performance record!

-Erik
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-23-2010, 08:41 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 136
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

Quote:
Originally Posted by X3MHunter View Post
............ "It's all about shot placement".

Don't get me wrong now, I understand that you "wish" the bullet had expanded and dropped the animal in it's tracks, or at least made more damage, but dead is dead............... but I have seen many poeple at the deer lease lose deer, and they use 300 WSM's and 30-378 Weatherby's! Was it bullet failure, or poor shot placement? I bet if I asked them they would say it was bullet failure!

Now, I'm not accusing anyone of poor shot placement, all I'm saying is that some people will blame the bullet performance and many other things before they blame themselves.


-Erik
X3MHunter/Erik:
Say what you like about bullet placement etc...but as I said in my response.....all of those 8 deer; the 3 "killed" deer and those other 5 lost stags were all recorded on video and the bullet placements shown during the playback on all deer were shown to be well placed "kill" shots...........the TSX just did not expand and perform in all 8 cases as it should have done as what it advertised it will to do.
My mates may as well have used military FMJ projectiles for what it was worth and would have achieved the same results!
The only thing these TSX bullets are good for is for head shots whilst spotlighting deer for minimal cape damage and I know of shooters calling themselves "hunters" who use these just for that purpose to achieve those exact results.

Regards and end of story with all due respect.

RR

Last edited by ridge rider; 10-23-2010 at 08:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-23-2010, 02:04 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Memphis Tn
Posts: 318
Re: Barnes triple shock disappointment

RR

I understand what you are saying. I have not had that much experience shooting deer with Barnes TSX bullets since I have shot only one deer and that convinced me that the Barnes TSX bullets were too hard for deer.

My experience was a small buck in Nebraska that I shot with my 7mm Rem Mag loaded with 160 grain TSX bullets at about 2950 ft/sec.. I had loaded these rounds for an elk hunt and I wanted to try them since that were very accurate out on that gun. I put two bullets into the deer(under 75 yards) without the deer reacting. A third bullet through both shoulders finished him off. Neither bullet was recovered and the exit holes were very small. I will admit that the first two shot were too far back on the deer but they both just flew right through him with little damage.

I have seem my son shoot deer with 140 Accubonds and the deer reacted much differently. My hunting buddy shots deer with a 7-08 using Hornday Interlock bullets and they do a number on deer.

So this deer season my 270WSM is loaded with 140 Accubonds. My grandson will shoot my 260 Rem loaded with 120 Nosler BT, and my son will shoot 140 Accubonds out of his 280 Rem.. I think that most premium bullets are not needed for deer unless the velocity exceeds 3000 ft/sec.. I also know that my son's 280 does not quite get to 3000 ft/sec., but he has had great luck shooting big Nebrasks corn fed deer with his 280 Rem using 140 Accubond bullets.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Barnes triple shock disappointment
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Barnes triple shock Fergus Bailey Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 8 10-22-2010 09:47 PM
.338 Rum and Barnes Triple shock angus-5024 Reloading 3 08-26-2009 09:01 AM
Barnes triple-shock .224 53gr. telkev Reloading 4 05-05-2008 05:07 AM
BARNES TRIPLE SHOCK gettheleadout Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 16 02-03-2006 11:35 PM
barnes triple shock missedshot Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 2 12-22-2003 03:40 PM

Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.84%
1,475 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.09%
1,832 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.16%
1,322 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.00%
571 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.94%
225 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.97%
284 Votes
Total Votes: 5,709
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC