Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Deer Hunting


Reply

7.62 vs .243

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-15-2012, 10:04 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 39
7.62 vs .243

I've been in the market for another deer rifle, this time purely "mid-range". Now, I already own a .243, but I am picking up a Saiga 7.62 x39 in the next few days. Never mind accuracy, as I have both guns already (the first Saiga is purely tactical), and both can hit where I aim, but am I better off with a lighter, faster round in the .243, which I primarily coyote hunt with? Or, do I follow my gut and use the low and slow, heavier 7.62? I've killed game with both (varmints), deer with neither. Only experienced answers and opinions, not interested in consolation calibers. I don't care for 30-06, use .308 for primarily stand locations with 300+ yard shots, and 300 win mag for unknowns. These two will fill a niche, but only one is getting carried. Thanks fellas.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-15-2012, 11:14 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Geary, Oklahoma
Posts: 204
Re: 7.62 vs .243

The 7.62 x 39 does not have near the muzzle energy or velocity that the .243 has. That being said, the 7.62x39 bleeds off quickly in velocity past 200m and the drop is better measured in feet than inches once past the 200 m mark.

There is a reason why the Russian 5.54 has been in use longer that the 7.62 x 39.

I prefer the 243 over the 7.62 x 39.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-16-2012, 03:56 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jay Oklahoma
Posts: 107
Re: 7.62 vs .243

The 243 With a 95 or 100gr bullet shoots faster, flatter, farther, I would go with it. I have shot a lot of 7.62X39 and I like it but would feel short changed
hunting with it.
For me the 7.62x39 is a good 100-150 yard cartridge,but the 243 can handle
that and a hole lot more.
With the way my luck runs I would carry the 7.62x39 and the only buck I would see would be at 300-350 yards, what a bummer but with my 243 that would call for a smile and a giggle before the shot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-16-2012, 08:16 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Re: 7.62 vs .243

I have both, and often thought to use the 7.62 just for my woods stands. I have yet to shoot at a deer with it, but I think it would perform well to 200yrds.
My father and I got a deal on a thousand rounds of 7.62, and its about time to start shooting them up.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-16-2012, 10:13 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 358
Re: 7.62 vs .243

I use the 243 with a 105 A-max and I know it works out to 300 yds with no problems. I'll have to wait until next season to stretch it to 400.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-17-2012, 09:36 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Little Falls, MN
Posts: 251
Re: 7.62 vs .243

Are you useing the surplus ammo for deer hunting ???
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-17-2012, 10:47 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 57
Re: 7.62 vs .243

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDHEAD View Post
Are you useing the surplus ammo for deer hunting ???
I havn't yet, but I will this year.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you watch outdoor shows live or by recording them?
Always recorded - 13.33%
109 Votes
Mostly recorded - 24.21%
198 Votes
Sometimes recorded - 14.18%
116 Votes
Rarely or never recorded - 48.29%
395 Votes
Total Votes: 818
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC