Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Regional Forums > West

West MT, CO, WY, NM, NV, UT, CA, ID, WA, OR, AZ, HI, AK


Looking to fill a gap

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2013, 08:13 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Looking to fill a gap

I am looking to fill a gap in my current factory rifles and would certainly appreciate your years of experience. I am looking for a .26 caliber and want to shoot 500 yards or farther. Will be used mostly for paper but would like a multi-use rifle.

I currently own the following factory rifles:

Original Remington Sendero's in 25-06, 7mm Remington and .300 Win Mag
Remington 700 SPS Tactical .223
Remington .243 700 Varmint

Over the years I have concentrated mainly on the range of bullet weights while maintaining velocities between 3000 and 3200 fps as a general rule. I would truly appreciate your recommendations for a .26 cal to fill the gap for a factory rifle. Being sooo old, I have a soft spot for the .264 but have no experience with it. I do reload for all of my rifles, if this helps. Thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 11:58 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17
Re: Looking to fill a gap

I am in about the same boat as you, but add a caliber in there @ .277.

.6MM Rem
.250 Ack. Imp.
.25-06 Ack. Imp.

.270 Win
Building a 7MM STW now
.300 RUM

I am looking at a 6.5-284 (long action) right now also. Should easily net you 130 @ 3000+ and 140 gr. bullet over 2900 fps in my research.

The .260 Ack. Imp. (my other choice) in a short action shoots 120 gr. @ 3100+FPS, 130 gr. @ 3000+ fps, and the 140 gr. @ 2900+ FPS.

There is also the 6.5-06 for a true long action. 130 gr. @ 3100-3250 FPS and 140 gr. @ 3000-3100 FPS. You can "Ackley" this round too for a little more speed if wanted.

Or you could go totally crazy and get a 6.5 STW.....120 Gr. @ 3600 FPS, 130 gr. @ 3500 FPS, 140 gr. @ 3300+ FPS......
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 12:25 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Re: Looking to fill a gap

Good Morning lancetkenyon:
I have gotten a lot of excellent recommendations from all of you experts. Every single recommendations has valid pro's and con's, but one that really sticks in my mind is "What will be popular tomorrow"? The main point was the performance factors, of course, but also the future availability of reloading components. If performance is reasonably similar among the different groups, the 6mm-06 is definitely on my list. I personally don't have anything against a long action, and I know the capabilities of the -06. It is also a round that I know my Grand Kids will be able to handle, as they move up.

All of the rounds that you have listed are excellent choices for what I am looking for. The old saying of "There really aren't any easy choices" seems to be getting harder, rather than easier. We are taking the .223 Remington Tactical with 16.5 inch 1/7 twist barrel out tomorrow. Am really looking forward to seeing how it runs out.

Thanks again to everyones help with this. I truly appreciate it.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 01:45 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17
Re: Looking to fill a gap

As for "popular in the future", brass will always be available for the .25-06, .270 Win, so necking up or down should not be an issue.

Powders are getting revised and added to all the time, and with the slower burning powders coming around, a longer barrel is more acceptable to gain velocity.

Primers have not changed much in the past years, and I see no foreseeable change either.

Bullets are changing for the better all the time, and with the 6.5/.264 market growing like it is with the long range game and hunters, I see the popularity sticking around for a long time too, especially in the higher end bullets like Berger, Barnes, Hornady, Sierra, etc. Used to be only a very few factory .264 offerings like the .264 Win Mag (another candidate to consider!) and the 6.5 Rem Mag (now pretty much obsolete except hand loading and custom chambering).

Once you buy a quality set of dies for reloading, you should be set for life with them, so no need to replace there either.

I see the 6.5-06 being a very easy candidate for long range hunting, and even for women/kids to shoot as well. My .25-06 Ack. Imp. is easily shootable by my 10 year old daughter, and she even shoots the .270 Win with a muzzle brake. You could always add one of those and really get the recoil down to tolerable levels.

Whatever you do, get a quality built rifle, good optics, and work up a good handload and you will be set for a long range medium game rig. Antelope, deer, etc. will not know what hit them. My neighbor has a .264 Win Mag and he has shot Coues whitetail between 600-980 yds. every year in Mexico, usually more than one a trip. Makes me so jealous......
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 02:56 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Bloomfield, Iowa
Posts: 103
Re: Looking to fill a gap

If you like your Remington senderos you currently have you might look for a .264 win mag sendero. They are no longer being made but odds are good you could find one somewhere. Maybe even NIB.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 04:58 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 13
Re: Looking to fill a gap

Lance & Bullfrog.......
You are both dead-on. I have always had a soft-spot for the .264 ever since the late 60's. In past posts on this thread, there was thought of muzzle blast and kick for kids......at that point I started asking myself if the gun really was for them or me!!! If I picked up a .264 Sendero, that would complete the cartridge family in the Sendero's for me. Weight is not a consideration for me (I'm old and don't carry much any more). The weight of the barrel/stock actually counter-act the recoil, which helps the kids. Besides, they will move up when they feel that they are ready, not me. They only keep me to reload for them, haha.

I have never really had a custom rifle, so when this all started was thinking about one, but needed a lot of advice from you pro's to shorten years of trial and error on my part. I will eventually get the missing .264 Sendero (for me), but have really been giving a lot of thought to a 6mm-06 with 30" barrel. I think that it would be capable of punching holes in paper a long ways off.....

All of my present guns have the fat barrels.....that being said, I am aging by the day, so I feel the need to cheat (what is it about Old Bull - Young Bull). My .223 and .243 have a 6X24 scope and the 25-06, 7mm and .300 have 8X32 on them. Sure helps old eyes. Besides, shooting at distance, normally gives you a bit more time to acquire than setting in a tree stand. Just a little extra edge is all that I need. An old Chief use to tell me that if you found yourself in a fair fight, your tactics were all wrong. There's a lot of truth to that.
Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2013, 05:34 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 17
Re: Looking to fill a gap

I have a few 6.5-20 scopes, but most wear the 4-16 range of magnification. I usually leave them on the least amount of magnification available for quick shots or closer shots that might present itself quickly. Makes for easier sight acquisition with a wider field of view. Also really helps my 10 year old find the target quicker. Then we can dial it up if needed for a long shot.

While I use the high magnification for sighting in, I only dial it up once a target (animal) has been found, or to help check an animal I ma thinking of shooting.

Be aware that kids usually cannot find the target nearly as easily as seasoned hunters who get a sense of point and shoot over time and experience. Even some adults I know cannot find a target (game animal) quickly enough on top magnification due to too little field of view and not enough experience with knowing where a rifle is pointing when they shoulder it.

While 8-32 would be amazing on a prairie dog town, or a 600+ yard shot at a bedded or feeding animal, it makes sight acquisition tough on a relatively close (even 100 yds) and moving animal if you are not used to it or have a lot of field time behind a scope. Although I can hit a running jackrabbit at 30 yds. on 3 power which drives my brother crazy, I do not know if I could do that with an 8 power scope even at 50 yds.

As for the kids, like I mentioned, a muzzle brake does wonders for recoil reduction for kids/women/recoil sensitive shooters. I even enjoy shooting more with them, even in marginally heavy calibers like my .270 Win. Look at the long range game shooters, they have brakes on 6.5 Creeds, .308s, 6mm Supers, etc. to aid in precise shooting. Plus, it gives kids bragging rights that they can shoot the big guns....
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.96%
1,531 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.11%
1,894 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.09%
1,362 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.00%
590 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.92%
231 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.92%
290 Votes
Total Votes: 5,898
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 PM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC