LongRangeHunting.com


Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Chatting and General Stuff > Outdoor News - Using This Location Again
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Shop Cabelas Member Map Register Mark Forums Read

Click to register now Click to register now Click to register now

Closed Thread

Arizona Draw Snafu, Asking “what can brown do for you” not good idea

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-17-2008, 06:22 AM
PUBLISHER
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,736
Arizona Draw Snafu, Asking “what can brown do for you” not good idea

Arizona Game & Fish Commission Denies Cabela’s Request

An apparent snafu by the delivery company with that trademark phrase has left several hundred elk hunting hopefuls out in the cold when it comes to this year’s drawings.

On Friday, the Arizona Game and Fish Commission unanimously voted to deny a request by Cabela’s that would have extended the 2008 pronghorn antelope and elk draw deadline.

The petition from Cabela’s for the extension came after theArizona Game and Fish Departmentreceived elk and antelope applications submitted by Cabela’s tag service after the established deadline. Those applications were on behalf of 568 hunters.

Cabela's offers an application service known as T.A.G.S. — Trophy Application and Guide Service. For a fee ($50 each in the case of Arizona elk and antelope), Cabela's will prepare your applications for western big game draw licenses, including analyzing and selecting premier trophy areas. They also front the application money for you ($595 in the case of Arizona elk, $485 in the case of antelope).

Arizona Game and Fish Commission officials say the petition says Cabela’s sent to the department three packages through a private courier fromNebraskaon February 11, 2008. The packages, unfortunately, didn’t arrive at the department location until after the posted deadline time of 7 p.m. on February 12, 2008.

The commission agreed to the hearing in accordance with Commission Rule R12-4-611 that allows for petitions to be heard by the commission when no other administrative remedy exists. In the unanimous decision, it appears the Commissioners felt there was really no remedy that would be equitable – other than a rejection of the petition.

As you can imagine, the chat rooms in Arizona lit up with the story – and what were some bits of miscommunication that resulted in Cabela’s commenting on some of the chats and discussion boards. In those comments, a Cabela’s spokesperson said that, despite all the rumors, there was never a thought, implication or threat of a lawsuit against the state if the petition were denied. “With full faith in the administrative process,” the statement says, “Cabela’s will abide by the decision of the Commission.”

Some of the 568 out-of-luck tag applicants might disagree with that high-road approach. The repeat applicants will lose a bonus point that would have been awarded to hunters who entered the drawing but didn’t receive a tag. If they had applied five consecutive years for a tag for a particular genus, they would also have received a “loyalty bonus point”- those, too, are gone under the petition decision. To accumulate those points now will mean not being awarded a tag for the next five years.

Arizona officials explained that under the worst case scenario an individual would not earn a bonus point, would lose one and now have to apply for five consecutive years before being awarded the bonus point. All the individuals, however, will still have the bonus points they’ve earned for being unsuccessful in past draws or draws that they purchased a bonus point.

Clear? Me neither. Net-net, the Game and Fish Commission decision means that the rules, quite simply, are the rules, even if you are a major retailer that’s been let down – big time- by a courier service.
__________________
To email Len, click HERE
My photos at LenBackus.com

  #2  
Old 03-17-2008, 07:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central AZ.
Posts: 152
"Some of the 568 out-of-luck tag applicants might disagree with that high-road approach. The repeat applicants will lose a bonus point that would have been awarded to hunters who entered the drawing but didn’t receive a tag. If they had applied five consecutive years for a tag for a particular genus, they would also have received a “loyalty bonus point”- those, too, are gone under the petition decision. To accumulate those points now will mean not being awarded a tag for the next five years."


I'll try to help here.
The first part is a little misleading.
They are not losing a point, they did not Gain a new point.

Second this by no means, means they can not draw a tag for the next 5 years.
It means they have 2 less points going into next years draw
If they had a loyalty point and I would think only a very small minority did.

Here is how the point system works.
1- If you take the hunter education class you gain 1 perminet point.
2- every year you apply and do not draw you gain 1 point.
3- If you apply 5 years in a row you gain a loyalty point.
4- If you miss a year you loose the loyalty point.

So:
Hunter Ed.+ yearly point+ loyalty point = points going into the draw.
1 + 6 + 1 = 8


Think of the points as lottery tickets,
You can win the lottery with only one ticket
but your chances are a little better with 8 tickets.

So those Applicants using the above numbers if they were not drawn this year will have 7 point going into next years draw instead of 9.

It is still the luck of the Draw.
Mike

Last edited by gamehauler; 03-17-2008 at 09:15 AM.
  #3  
Old 03-17-2008, 01:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 322
Nothing like waiting until the last minute.

Arizona Game and Fish Commission officials say the petition says Cabela’s sent to the department three packages through a private courier fromNebraskaon February 11, 2008. The packages, unfortunately, didn’t arrive at the department location until after the posted deadline time of 7 p.m. on February 12, 2008.

Guaranteed next day delivery has never been a sure thing.
I would place blame on Cabela's.

James
  #4  
Old 03-17-2008, 02:14 PM
PUBLISHER
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,736
That's exactly what I thought. If it was my business I would have driven them to AZ just to be sure...if I had waited that long.
__________________
To email Len, click HERE
My photos at LenBackus.com
  #5  
Old 03-17-2008, 02:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 539
I suppose my first question would be:

When DID they arrive?

If the answer was the next morning, then what is the harm?

Second question:

IF you have Commission Rule R12-4-611 that allows for petitions to be heard by the commission when no other administrative remedy exists.

What is that rules purpose? If your answer is going to be NO!, then just say you are screwed and that's that!

My third and last question:

Have they EVER bent the rules for anyone, or for any reason?

Do visiting Dignitaries ever get special permits? I suspect that rules are sometimes bent....

edge.
  #6  
Old 03-17-2008, 03:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Central AZ.
Posts: 152
They arrived at 9:00 PM.
2 hours after deadline.

G&F told them no so they requested the petition.
I think this was Cabela just trying to do everything they could for their customers.

I really do not think they have bent the rules in that way.
They would come under so much attack from hunters.

The AZGFD lost over $90,000.00 in license and application fees.
By not accepting them and that is if none of those applicants did not draw.

The Department did the the right thing but I do feel for Cabelas customers.

Mike
  #7  
Old 03-17-2008, 06:36 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 539
TWO HOURS LATE!

If that is really the case, then the rule: Commission Rule R12-4-611
is nothing more than a joke!

I am glad that I don't live there, cuz I know I'd end up in jail

At least New Jersey Politicians are just crooks, I can understand that, but MORONS....sorry that is just too dumb.

edge.
Closed Thread


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Arizona denies request to extend elk deadline for 500 Cabela's draw service clients Len Backus Outdoor News - Using This Location Again 0 03-14-2008 07:17 PM
chamber snafu question for smiths slophish Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 14 11-05-2006 10:22 AM
Colorado Draw results out Dave King General Discussion 13 05-27-2006 04:37 PM
A good idea ? - barrel threads ds Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 09-23-2005 03:29 PM
Good idea. Gerard Schultz Long Range Hunting 0 05-09-2001 12:34 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2007 LenBackus.net, LLC
Ad Management by RedTyger