close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Magazine Articles > Technical Articles - Discussion

Reply

Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 04-19-2011, 07:34 PM
Administrator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,118
Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

Quote:
There are so many different kinds of binoculars to choose from. With the natural world unbelievably rich in diversity with so many different landscapes, light and weather conditions, every one of us has specific needs and expectations from "our" binoculars. Because of this, using two different kinds of binoculars can be a necessity. For instance, compare the hazy, smoggy and sunny environment of the San Fernando Valley in the City of Los Angeles to the clear crisp air of the Colorado Rockies. Just the thought should change your mindset as the contrast between these two areas is obvious and there is quite a bit to take into account.
Read More...
This is a thread for discussion of the article, Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic, By Ward Brien. Here you can ask questions or make comments about the article.
__________________
.
What's In Len's Backpack?

See Len's take on his own 51 items.
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 04-20-2011, 09:52 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2002
    Location: Nebraska
    Posts: 410
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    Nice, well written and easy to understand.
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 04-23-2011, 12:48 AM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Posts: 46
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    mutch to digest.
    I just saved to .doc and will read soon.
    A lot of good info there during my quick scan.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 04-23-2011, 09:36 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: Phoneix
    Posts: 49
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    Thank you Ward for the very informative article. I am, however, still confused by the following statement you made concerning the Shadow Effect:

    If the sunlight is behind you, it will cause a .25 moa drop. If you zeroed your rifle in sunlight, and you then shoot in cloud cover or heavy overcast, the bullet’s point of impact will be low, .5 moa. This is caused by “Shadow Effect.”

    If you take away the environmental cause of a .25 MOA drop (sunlight behind), wouldn't that result in the gun shooting higher, not lower? What am I missing?

    Thanks,

    Marc
    __________________
    .340 Weatherby Magnum
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 05-03-2011, 01:00 PM
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2008
    Posts: 23
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    Wow one of the best written pieces I have seen in a while! Great information, thank you for putting this together.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 05-13-2011, 07:44 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: N. Texas
    Posts: 270
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    I enjoyed the article very much Ward. I had no idea about light bending.
    Always something to learn.
    Send me a PM and I can pass somethign on to you.
    Thank you for taking the time to put all this information
    together so that us hunters can understand it.
    Without a doubt I can and will read the article again and again and
    most likely learn something each time.
    Excellent job.
    __________________
    My name is Bart, I am a longtime hunter and I am here to answer any questions on Nikon hunting optics you may have. I will also be sharing new products and specials on occasion.
    Nikon Pro Staff
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 05-14-2011, 08:52 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2010
    Posts: 420
    Re: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic

    Hello Bart at Nikon prostaff. 2 questions. There is no doubt in my mind that a A.O. is sharper than a S.F., Ive been told it is because there is less glass in them is this true. Secondly Nikon Monarchs do not have a long enough tube length to be placed comfortabley on rifles that use integral mounts. There is no concern with sharpness or quality, does Nikon have a scope for intergral mounts, The eye relief distance arqument is absolutely not valid on adjustables of any manufacturer when turned up to the higher magnifications. Looking for a scope to reccomend.
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: Precision Shooting 1-Part 2: Optics, Data and Logic
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Precision Shooting 1-Part 1: The Basics of Your Rifle ADMIN Technical Articles - Discussion 12 09-07-2012 01:07 PM
    Precision Shooting 1-Part 3: Marksmanship: Just The Basics ADMIN Technical Articles - Discussion 1 07-01-2011 08:40 PM
    Optics for low light shooting Varmint Hunter Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 6 11-14-2009 02:01 AM
    The Ultimate Shooting Challenges - Long Shots and Movers, Part One by Ian McMurchy Len Backus Ian's Corner - Discussion 2 11-20-2007 09:53 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:28 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC