close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Gunsmithing

Reply

TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Unread 02-15-2010, 08:11 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: ALASKA
Posts: 504
Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

jpronto-Very good of you to post pics. This thread ought to be a sticky for M995 builds.

Do you have the colors/percentages used on that McMillan swirl pattern in the picture you posted by chance?
Reply With Quote
  •   #9  
    Unread 02-15-2010, 08:26 PM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2002
    Posts: 66
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Autorotate View Post
    jpronto-Very good of you to post pics. This thread ought to be a sticky for M995 builds.

    Do you have the colors/percentages used on that McMillan swirl pattern in the picture you posted by chance?

    When I have some time, I will try to dig up the information.

    Regards,
    __________________
    www.rpsinternational.com
    Reply With Quote

      #10  
    Unread 03-02-2010, 02:55 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: South Africa
    Posts: 422
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

    My TRG-S is in a McM A5.

    The bottom metal is as pictured. You use the mag catch and the folded "spring" from the existing rifle. A bit fiddly and irritating to remove the mag catch and this leaves the old stock useless. I wish they would just provide the new parts.

    Aside from that it's pretty good. As with the std factory stock the mag tends to drop out at the back and hang out of the bottom metal a bit. Sako could have done a better job on this and a true mag "box" to insert the mag into would have helped, but yes, Sako was saving cash. McM try to make the mag box area very tight to avoid this type of thing. It sort of works, but I bent the spring to try to avoid the problem. As I use the rifle as a single shot I haven't bothered much, but will look at this aspect later. A bit of silicon to create a jam fit may help, but it's not my way of fixing things on rifles.

    This is my only complaint.

    I'm going to change to a proper recoil lug later this year, as the standard molded in "lug" is a poor excuse for one and in 338 LM it will be worse than my 300 WM. I strongly adivse you try a washer type lug as on a Rem 700 and bed as per usual.

    Not to highjack this... Autorotate, have you used the Jard and which did you get, a kit or complete trigger?

    I like my TRG or actually my M995 very much...
    LRHWAL
    Reply With Quote
      #11  
    Unread 03-02-2010, 02:57 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2006
    Location: South Africa
    Posts: 422
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

    Sorry, didn't see it was a sticky.... hope the comments add something though!
    Reply With Quote
      #12  
    Unread 04-18-2010, 10:40 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2004
    Location: Texas
    Posts: 1,074
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

    I have a chance to pick up a 995, but do not like the cheesy stock and bottom metal. I also don't like the detachable mag. It is not secure at the back, limits C.O.A.L.. and looks like an ugly growth on the bottom of the stock.

    It's just possible that MK V bottom metal could be fitted to the action, and a MK V stock could be bedded to the action. I haven't done precise measurements because the rifle is not mine, but rough dimensions are 7.75" action screw spacing front to back screw. A MK V is approx 8.125". If the cheesy notch in the bottom of the receiver ring was dovetailed, a lug was fabricated and driven in, and then T.I.G. welded only on the ends, not front and back, (warpage) it could be drilled and tapped 1/4 x 28tpi in the middle of the lug for the front action screw. A MK V stock could be bedded in 2 steps from the existing flat bottom inlet to the round bottom 995. Sounds reasonable to me.

    Mauser action screw spacing appears to be about 1/16" longer than the 995, and Rem L/A spacing is way short. I looked at the Rem first because of availability of stuff, the round bottom receiver, and the add-on recoil lug. Too short just doesn't work though.

    Not sure if I'll pursue this rifle. It is in .416 Rem Mag, and I've got that caliber bracketed, so the rifle would be a donor to me. With a truly fine action, but crappy trim.

    I got a 995 barrel off this site through the largesse of Autorotate before this came up, and checked it for crossover to a different action. As far as I can tell, it's a metric thread of 1.055" major diameter and pitch between 16 tpi and 18 tpi. My lathe has change gears and threading tables for metric threads, so a custom barrel in a boomer caliber could be fitted pretty painlessly. The bolt face also looks super easy to open up.

    Bottom line, I'm very impressed with the potential of this action, but not the rifle as a whole. Too many compromises.

    I'm chewing on it. Would be an interesting project. Tom
    __________________
    Texas State Rifle Association Life Member
    NRA Endowment Life Member

    A big fast bullet will beat a little fast bullet every time
    Reply With Quote
      #13  
    Unread 04-18-2010, 11:31 PM
    JRu JRu is offline
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Nov 2006
    Location: Finland
    Posts: 66
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question



    I'll try to take a better pic once home from work, but consider the TRG stock -- it's a straight drop-in for the TRG-S action. You'll need a TRG trigger or you need to modify the TRG-S trigger to fit ( on TRG the safety is inside the trigger group, on TRG-S it's in the traditional top location ) but if you decide to fit the original trigger, you'll also be needing a custom trigger guard. Also, M995 magazines will not fit in the TRG chassis. I went for the TRG trigger and magazine route.

    The TRG chassis adds a pound in weight which I consider a fair trade as far as improved ergonomics go; My M995 was a straight shooter already but I would throw a flyer every once in a while ( putting a 5-shot group from sub- - MOA to "just" sub-MOA ). With the TRG stock accuracy feels more repeatable, as this crow (368 yards) would testify. The range could've been double, no problem.

    Reply With Quote
      #14  
    Unread 07-20-2010, 11:09 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2005
    Location: Juneau, Alaska
    Posts: 213
    Re: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question

    You should tighten your belt next time, maybe the recoil won't blow you outa your pants.

    Festus
    __________________
    "Fenced yards ain't hole cards and like as not never will be, reason for rhymers and old five and dimers like me."
    Willie Nelson
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes


    Similar Threads for: TRG-S 338 LM bottom metal Question
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    Question about Seekins Bottom Metal SHRTSHTR Gunsmithing 9 02-28-2010 01:25 PM
    Which bottom metal Shaidon Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 07-23-2008 09:21 AM
    Badger M5 Bottom Metal feed question wildcat General Discussion 0 04-30-2008 01:52 PM
    bottom metal and detachable bottom remingotn 700 tjonh2001 Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 8 03-13-2008 06:46 PM
    Winchester bottom metal question (need help fitting) James Jones General Discussion 0 05-27-2006 05:38 PM


    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:51 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC