Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > Varmint Hunting

Varmint Hunting Techniques For Prairie Dogs, Woodchucks, etc.


.204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-31-2011, 10:45 AM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,155
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

Hi Rob,
I'm going to throw my opinion it for what its worth. Ballistics is ballistics. When you compare the two bullets of identical weight, The 204 will shoot faster, flatter, and with less wind deflection than a 223. If you are going to hand load, the 204 will out run the 223 to a certain point. It all has to do with diameter of the bullet proportion to length. We see the same debate between the 338, 30, and 284 calibers. The 204 in a 39 grain bullet will actually be effected less than a 40 grain .224 caliber bullet due to the higher BC. To match the ballistics of 39grn Sierra Blitzking (.287 BC) in .204, the .223, will have to go to a 60grn V-max (.255 BC), 68grn BTHP (.355 BC), or the 55grn Sierra Blitzking (.271 BC). Hornady does now make a 53grn V-max with a .290 BC. So that particular bullet would trump the .204. However the only factory offering of that particular bullet in 223 that I know of is their proprietary line of Superformanc ammo. You would have to hand load to use this particular bullet otherwise. I've crunched the numbers and when it comes to a small bore, I'll more than likely go with a .204 Ruger or some variant there of.

Matthew 7:13-14
"Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. [14] But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it.

If you find your self in a fair fight, your tactics suck!- Marine 1st Sergeant Jim Ryfinger

Friends don't let friends develop canonitis!-chucknbach

arguing over the internet is like the special Olympics....even if you win, you are still...special!
Reply With Quote

Unread 03-31-2011, 02:00 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 165
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

Thanks guys for all your responses. I have taken a lot of time to look at the rifles and due to cost I am coming down on the side of the .223.
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-07-2011, 10:59 PM
Official LRH Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: N. Texas and S. Africa
Posts: 8,094
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

Originally Posted by robbobsam View Post
Hiya guys,

I am trying to decide which calibre to go for, .223Rem or .204 Ruger.

I already have a .243 Tikka that is awesome for longer ranges and will easily hit 1.5" groups at 300yds. The problem is that most of my hunting recently is at night with a lamp after rabbits and foxes and the .243 is a little too much gun for that purpose.

I shoot at night up to 250yds and would like a flat shooting rifle that will be cheap to feed.

The .243 is hungry on powder and has a bit of a kick which is affecting accuracy when I need to take a quick shot at a twitchy rabbit at 250yds away.

I understand the .223 has less kick than the .243 and will give a flat shooting bullet if you use the 40-50 grainers, but the .204 Ruger will give better ballistics and less kick.

Unfortunately the .204 ruger is rumoured to have a short barrel life expectancy.

Can you guys please give me the benefit of your experience on calibre choice ???

Thanks guys, looking forward to your thoughts.
204 Ruger hands down for your application.

One nice thing about that tiny little bullet traveling @4000fps + is that it literally explodes if you hit anything. That means if you miss your intended target the odds of damaging property, game, or farm/ranch animals is extremely minimal.

When compared to the .223 I find it to be an absolutely superior varmint round for any application.

BBL life is no problem at all if you aren't pushing max loads. I have about 4,500 rounds through my CZ 527 (stock bbl) and it still drives tacks. Avoid max loads, and do proper/regular maintenance and it should serve you well for a long time.

For my next .204 or .220 swift I'll probably have Accuracy Systems Inc in Colorado build me one in an AR-15 platform, if not one of their custom Ruger Mini's.

Carl is amongst the best rifle builders I have ever been associated with and I've been a very satisfied customer for a long time.

Rifle Accuracy Systems Inc Custom Accurate Rifles Barrel Conversions Ruger Mini Remington 700 7400 750 AR10 AR15
Without the First and Second Amendments the rest of The Constitution is Meaningless.
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-08-2011, 05:02 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: vermont
Posts: 128
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

If you run a 204 1-9 twist barrel, shoot 50 gr berger hptbt, out of 24 in barrel,from D-tech you will sell your 223 fast . my two cents...
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-17-2011, 04:43 PM
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

I have a 223 rem, great rifle, 22-250 rem better rifle and I bought a 204 ruger for myself for xmas this last year. Hey I like me lol. I love that little gun, find myself killing more squeeks with it than the other 2 combined.
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-18-2011, 12:31 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gillette, WY
Posts: 2,995
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

Out of all the rifles I have (~12), when I head out to either spotlight or prarie dog hunt the very first rifle I grab is my .204. Granted I take at least 2 with me, but the .204 gets WAY more rounds put through it than any 3 or 4 rifles I own put together.

I was fairly concerned about it's terminal performance on coyotes for such a little bullet but to this date I've killed every coyote I've shot at from 20 -250yds
Hell, part of the bullet actually exited on the 20yd broadside!

I have a growing soft spot for the little .204, stellar cartridge.

Last edited by Outlaw6.0; 05-18-2011 at 12:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
Unread 05-19-2011, 08:05 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 341
Re: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???

I went through the same debate a few years ago and picked up a .204. The rifle is very accurate, cheap to reload for, and have almost no recoil. I can spot all my shots all day long. Here are some comparisons I ran through JBM awhile ago. There is an incorrect notion that the .204 has problems in the wind, probably due to the light bullet weight, but the 39 gr blitzking, with its .287 BC, is just great. I shoot them around 3750 FPS.

Bullet Weight/Type BC Cartridge Name Velocity 400 yd 10 MPH wind Drift

39gr Sierra Blitzking 0.287 .204 Ruger 3750 11.5"
40gr Hornady Vmax 0.275 .204 Ruger 3900 11.5"
40gr Nosler BT 0.239 .204 Ruger 3750 14.3"

40gr Sierra Blitzking 0.196 .223 Rem 3700 18.6"
40gr Hornady Vmax 0.200 .223 Rem 3700 18.2"
40gr Nosler BT 0.221 .223 Rem 3700 16.0"

40gr Sierra Blitzking 0.196 .220 Swift 4250 15.6"
40gr Hornady Vmax 0.200 .220 Swift 4250 15.2"
40gr Nosler BT 0.221 .220 Swift 4250 13.5"

40gr Sierra Blitzking 0.196 .22-250 Rem 4150 16.1"
40gr Nosler BT 0.221 .22-250 Rem 4150 13.9"
40gr Hornady Vmax 0.200 .22-250 Rem 4150 15.7"
55gr Sierra Blitzking 0.237 .22-250 Rem 3680 14.8"
55gr Nosler BT 0.267 .22-250 Rem 3680 12.8"

As you can see, the .204 really shines (the 3900 fps 40 gr vmax is from the Hornady factor ammo).

As for barrel life, you can expect 4000-5000 rounds for most typical barrels. At least that is what the people I shoot with have been getting.
If you like your hunting rifle, you can keep your hunting rifle.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: .204 Ruger or .223 Remington ???
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP!! Ruger 77, 7mm Remington Mag deadeye2 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 11 11-21-2011 05:57 PM
FS - Remington BDL SPS .204 Ruger SOLD bugle1up Guns For Sale 0 04-17-2011 12:09 PM
Any 6mm Remington Ruger No1 loads skeeter1944 Varmint Hunting 2 03-18-2011 09:45 AM
WTS Ruger .223 and Remington .17 fireball dbasian1977 Guns For Sale 2 12-01-2010 07:57 PM
Remington 700 VLS .204 Ruger DesertDiesel Guns For Sale 3 04-07-2010 07:27 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.

All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC