Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2014, 10:09 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OR
Posts: 114
Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

I thought I would try some 180 grain Accubonds out of my 300wsm.
The only powder that the Nosler website shows that I currently have is R19. But I noticed that they show IMR4350 as an option, but not H4350. I do have some H4350 and hear about quite a few people saying they are using it in their wsm.

I know there is a slight difference between the two but was wondering if maybe the Nosler reloading book or somewhere else shows data for the H4350?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2014, 01:11 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 394
Re: Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

Buckus, I loaded some 185 Berger VLD in Federal brass with H4350 and 215M primers for a friend. After finding the right charge we played with seating depth and arrived at .780 MOA at 200 yds. Savage 16 stainless, laminated thumbhole stock, bedded. He uses his 300 to hunt elk in the thick junipers in N. Arizona. Good luck
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2014, 01:28 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: End of the Oregon Trail
Posts: 554
Re: Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

H4350 and 180 AB are very popular in the 300 WSM. Most work up to 63 or 64 Gn.
Also Fed 210 primers are popular with the load. I have used F210 and F215 and settled on the F215 for my 300 WSM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2014, 08:24 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: OR
Posts: 114
Re: Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barrelnut View Post
H4350 and 180 AB are very popular in the 300 WSM. Most work up to 63 or 64 Gn.
Also Fed 210 primers are popular with the load. I have used F210 and F215 and settled on the F215 for my 300 WSM.
Am I safe to assume that those using this particular combo are just working up a load with H4350 by starting low and close to IMR?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2014, 09:07 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: California Central Cost
Posts: 865
Re: Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

I found no 'not' in that combo. It should work very well.

For me:

  • Primers, rifle are more accurate and consistent than magnum, short powder column
  • Powder, for bullet weights in the 180 range H4350, the burn rate matches the 300 WSM very well, just like it matches the 260 Rem. very well.
  • Seating depth, well, the standard "you can't get there" at magazine length

I spend most 300WSM shooting time with 208 A-Max, previously used H4350 but switched to H4381 for the heavy weights because of availability. Will probably switch back.
__________________
Fred Seaman
“Ask, Listen, Learn, Grow”
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2014, 09:28 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 927
Re: Why not 180gr AB/ H4350/ 300wsm?

You can always use the Hodgdon online data. It's spot on. H4350 is perfect in the 300 WSM with 180s. Not sure why Nosler doesn't have data for it all the others do.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 29.88%
49 Votes
NO - 54.88%
90 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.24%
25 Votes
Total Votes: 164
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC