Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumManiac
Didn't I say that my powder measure is accurate to within .1 gr? MagnumManiac

|
Yes you did, but the way in which you said it it sounded like it was in .1 grain everytime you reset the screw, not .1 accurate on every throw. I have never heard of or seen a Redding BR measure be this accurate on big charges with big kernels. Again, you have unique results if this is true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumManiac
My chronograph also shows that if I 'trickle' to exactly the weight I want,or use my measure,there is no practical difference in extreme spread until .5 grain +/- is reached.With loads either thrown or weighed,I have found that the velocity difference can be held to +/- 25fps with both techniques.Velocities in even tuned rifles can deviate more than this shot to shot,so the trajectory differences are there anyway.The biggest difference made to ES was powder packing scheme,as thrown,or 'swirled' into the case with a funnel,this method reduced ES further which gave only a +/- difference of 10fps.I do this for 600yrd shooting with very good results. MagnumManiac

|
Again, your results are unique here. Interesting. I see much more variation than this if charges are simply thrown together. Why be so proud of being meticulous about getting .1 grain variation on charges when .4 grain variation (you claim) won't make any difference?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumManiac
I know most of the bench resters here ONLY use a powder measure,of course they still 'check' every 10th load thrown on a scale. MagnumManiac

|
No, we don't. We might check our click settings by scale to see if volume has changed when going to a new range to shoot but other than that, scales are actually somewhat rare at a benchrest match.