Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Sort by bearing length and by weight?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:47 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Central Indiana
Posts: 550
Sort by bearing length and by weight?

I'm trying to fine tune my reloading. I've purchased the Buhay tool and I'm in the process of sorting my bullets into .001" groups. Do I need to sort by weight too, or is it not necessary? If yes, then what weight variance should each group have?

FWIW, it's for one of Kirby's 7mm AM's.

Is .001" groupings of the bearing surface getting too anal?

I went back thru the sub-forum to 2007, and saw that bearing surface was more important than weight, but no numbers or % was given for determining how to group the bullets that were sorted.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2012, 05:41 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 1,067
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

What brand bullets? Some are more consistent than others.

I sort them out and use any that exceed 3 grains difference for sighters.

Bearing surface measurement is more important for good accuracy. Again, I cull out those that exceed .001".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2012, 09:09 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,844
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

I have used the Buhay tool for many years and use SMK's only and I do not sort by weight. Found that it was a waste of time..
__________________
The Truth Is Not Always Good For Business!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:17 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Central Indiana
Posts: 550
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

Wildcat 7mm bullets. I arbitrairly set the indicator at .000" and have groups of bullets that are as follows: -.002", -,001", .000", +.001", +.002", +.003"

There could be a varience of .001" within those groups, if a bullet was -.0004" or +.0004" from those numbers, it went into the same group. The biggest groups are .000" thru. +002", but the other groups aren't that far behind in numbers. I've only sorted 300 bullets so far.

I randomly grabbed bullets out of the groups and re-measured, and my measurements didn't change, so I'm confident that my measuring procedure is correct and repeatable.

I have 175g SMK's and 180g Bergers that I will be measuring too.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-01-2012, 12:39 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,169
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

I don't think bearing variance could be proven to make any difference at all.
For one, your datums aren't qualified as consistent(ogive radius, base angle).
And if your measuring base to nose, then base length would need to be accounted for differently.
Second, unless you account for each drag component, summed to contribute to BC, you could not know if bullets match in BC regardless of individual measures.
Third, without RADAR or atleast an accoustic chronograph, you cannot measure the tiny bullet engraving length affects to MV.

And as far as weight, if your bullets vary in weight enough to affect anything, you are using horrible bullets. All parameters would then be suspect so rake em into a trash can.
Pull out the wallet and buy the best bullets you can.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-01-2012, 01:27 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Central Indiana
Posts: 550
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

Mikecr, then what bullets do you suggest (that are available)?

If you knew what a Buhay tool was, then you wouldn't have made some of the other comments.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-01-2012, 02:07 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,844
Re: Sort by bearing length and by weight?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mikecr View Post
I don't think bearing variance could be proven to make any difference at all.
For one, your datums aren't qualified as consistent(ogive radius, base angle).
And if your measuring base to nose, then base length would need to be accounted for differently.
Second, unless you account for each drag component, summed to contribute to BC, you could not know if bullets match in BC regardless of individual measures.
Third, without RADAR or atleast an accoustic chronograph, you cannot measure the tiny bullet engraving length affects to MV.

And as far as weight, if your bullets vary in weight enough to affect anything, you are using horrible bullets. All parameters would then be suspect so rake em into a trash can.
Pull out the wallet and buy the best bullets you can.

I hope you are kidding. Len has told me not to put cold hard data out to make people look bad but for God's sake do the due diligence before you type..... Find out about the subject before making a formal statement. I am sorry I could not let this statement go unaddressed.

Bearing surface equals pressure. I have posted paragraphs about this in the past and I am sure others have as well.

Read this thread: Bullet Comparator for sorting bullets?
__________________
The Truth Is Not Always Good For Business!!

Last edited by Boss Hoss; 02-01-2012 at 02:38 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Sort by bearing length and by weight?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bullet Bearing Surface Length Question(s) royinidaho Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 18 07-07-2013 08:07 AM
Bullet Weight vs. Bearing Surface padd54 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 12 12-19-2010 12:42 PM
Bearing surface length? txsendero Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 12-23-2009 06:58 PM
Sort bearing surface? jmden Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 10-08-2008 07:41 AM
how much of a weight variation do you sort the cases by bigrich954rr Reloading 2 04-08-2007 06:28 PM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 8.00%
351 Votes
1 - 2.78%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.54%
638 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.36%
893 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.84%
651 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.66%
380 Votes
10 or more - 30.82%
1,352 Vote
Total Votes: 4,387
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC