Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Shocking Results!

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-04-2009, 01:31 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Shocking Results!

Just posted this over at 6mmbr, but for those that don't frequent that site, here are my findings.

Today I weight sorted some .284 Winchester brass. Needless to say I got a shocking result. I know there has been some discussion as to what brass guys are using in .284 Winchesters; either "straight" .284Win Win brand or necked-up 6.5x284 Lapua (oh the irony). I've read that Jerry Tierney extensively tested both Win and Lapua brass and found "Win brass shot as accurately as the Lapua brass". I know that the Win stuff will need to be annealed though. Anyway, here is the breakdown.

Started with 200 brass. Two bags of 50 with the same lot#, and 2 other bags of 50 with the same lot# but different from the first. I guess that was a complicated way of saying two groups of 100 with different lot#'s.

All brass was fully prepped. Flash holes deburred, primer pockets uniformed, full length sized, trimmed, necks turned, necks deburred, and inside of necks polished.

12 brass were immediately culled for random things like crimps and off center flash holes.
188 brass were weight sorted into groups with one grain increments. For example, group "205" weighed anywhere from 205.0gn to 205.9gn.

201gn - 2
202gn - 8
203gn - 21
204gn - 52
205gn - 54
206gn - 23
207gn - 14
208gn - 10
209gn - 4

56.3% of the brass were within 2gn!!!!

Just wanted to pass on my results. I thought someone would find this interesting. Anybody have anything to add? Anybody find similar results? Anybody using annealed Win brass? How do Lapua compare to Win in terms of weight uniformity?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-04-2009, 02:09 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bull Mtns MT
Posts: 593
Re: Shocking Results!

Looks like even if your paying twice the price for Lapua, It may be money well spent if their consistency is a little tighter.
__________________
I'd Rather Make a Slow Hit Than a Fast Miss!

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-04-2009, 02:14 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,232
Re: Shocking Results!

Nice picture. I've tried to line brass up like that and given up after playing dominoes with it. Now I use plastic bowls with post-it stickers on them.

Maybe I drink too much coffee?

I'd be interested to know the difference in water capacity between your lightest and heaviest brass, I've found that is the real determining factor for my brass sorting.

AJ
__________________
If some is good and more is better, then too much is just right.


My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought, cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-04-2009, 02:27 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Potomac River
Posts: 5,057
Re: Shocking Results!

That is more or less what I found with Winchester brass in 308. I managed to get 4 usable groups of out of three hundred cases (not counting the ones I threw away).

As AJ suggests, weight sorting alone will not do the entire job. It helps tremendously, but there will still be individual cases that produce fliers at long range. Immediately throw away any piece that does not shoot to group. After 1 or 2 firings you will have some very uniform brass.
__________________
The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2009, 05:50 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 322
Re: Shocking Results!

I have been doing all of my brass sorting by shooting them.I gave up on weighing,and filling them up with water.I keep all the one's that group together in a pile,the one's that were 1/2moa off(I mark them "high or "low"),and put the complete fliers in another pile.Anytime I go out and shoot,I just keep track of every shot,and mark the brass with a marker.In my opinion,this is the best way to sort brass.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2009, 06:03 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: IOWA
Posts: 1,863
Re: Shocking Results!

Do you weight sort before or after your brass prep ?
Looks like alot of work to me.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-04-2009, 07:04 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 26
Re: Shocking Results!

I weight sort AFTER brass prep.
Doing things like neck turning, uniforming flash holes, trimming etc. removes brass and therefore weight. The idea is to have brass that have exactly the same outside dimensions, then any variation in weight has to be variances inside the case, and therefore differences in internal volume.
I personally don't think, and can't for that matter, measure water accurately enough to use water as an accurate means of measuring internal volume. Sounds great in theory, but difficult to accomplish in reality.
In terms of work, I estimate I spend an hour on each piece of brass from start to finish. Things like turning and polishing necks are time consuming to say the least.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Shocking Results!
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any 110 gr Accubond results in 25-06? cbaker Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 07-06-2013 08:16 PM
More 300 RUM/260 SXR Results Jon A Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 12 05-22-2011 10:18 PM
30 cal GMX results Axtell3 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 08-21-2010 06:55 PM
338 225 nab end results D.Camilleri Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 2 12-01-2009 08:53 PM
Results on 300 win mag. TGM Reloading 28 02-28-2005 09:14 PM

Current Poll
I currently have hunting preference points in the following states

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC