Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-08-2012, 02:16 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

Due to magazine length in my 30-378 the OAL is limited to 3.69. With having to seat the 230 OTM Hybrid that deep do you think it will affect the accuracy? I have read that the 230 OTM is not as sensative on seating depths ( bullet jump ). Before I purchase and try them I was hoping to get input from you guys that are actually using them. After reading Broz. posts on how well the 230 OTM performs on game I would really like to switch to these.

Broz., you suggested starting at 3.80 but my magazine is too short.
Thanks for all your real life shooting information.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-08-2012, 04:10 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,898
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

.690" is a short mag box for a 30-378, is this a Mark V or something else?

Anyway, 3.800" is what will feed through an Accumark 30-378 mag box. You still have a ton of free bore in the 30-378 so I would just give it a try.

The 230's we shot in the factory accumark shot very well even with all the freebore. There are some reports of them shooting very well in the 300 RUM's too which also has freebore.

Our accuracy was running 1/2 to 3/4 moa from that factory 30-378 at 500 yards using H-1000. I feel this larger bullet will help with efficiecy ratio of the large 30-378 case which in some loads shows deminishing returns for the volume of powder.

Jef
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-08-2012, 08:44 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 14
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

Thanks for the reply Jeff.
The rifle is a custom light weight model, built off of a model 70 winchester by Mountain Rifles Inc in alaska.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2012, 09:13 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 150
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

I use the 230g OTM tactical bullet in my 30/338 win mag. I wasn't able to find an accurate load at magazine length in that rifle. I chose to single feed in the end to get to an accurate load. In all truth once in get through the stock of 230g I have I'll most likely go to the 210g Berger VLD hunting bullet. I can only get the 230 to shoot with accuracy at 2,800fps, so trading away some weight for velocity I may end up a little flatter. YMMV
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2012, 12:10 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,316
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

In all honesty, it depends on how far you plan on shooting out to. If you are going to shoot out past 1000 yds then that 230 gr Berger is going to give you better results than the 210 even if you are getting 200fps more with the 210. That extra 200 fps is nothing when you are shooting really long distances where the higher BC and more weight take precedence. Now if it were going 500 or 600 fps faster then I would look at the stats and see how it works out. Honestly though the speed that you are going to get from a bullet that is 20 grs lighter isnt going to do anything for you if you are shooting past 1000. If you are shooting under 1k then yes it may be more beneficial for you to go with the faster bullet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2012, 01:58 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 150
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

According to my estimates, which may well be not absolutely accurate, in my rifle the 210g vld has equal or better velocity and wind drift out to some where between 700 and 750 yards plus or minus. After that the markedly better BC of the 230 takes over and asserts itself as a better choice. Here in my neck of the woods the longest range available is 600 yards so I've never been able to validate predicted point of aim vs point of actual impact. I have found the 230 to behave actually slightly better than predicted to that range at least. I got all googly eyed with the wonderful BC when the 230 tactical OTM came on the market shortly after I purchased my rifle and just HAD to have some of them, so i bought a few hundred. I'd love to have a chance to send some off out to 1k and further validate the load. In all seriousness at the ranges I allow myself to shoot at the 210 would be "better" I haven't even attempted any shot beyond 600 with it but would love to. My thoughts on switching to the 210 are rooted in the fact that I just don't even try anything beyond 600 as it is not validated and therefor IMO not ethical to "tryout"'on game. I just dropped my rifle at the gunsmiths to have a KDF muzzlebrake mounted so I'll be without my baby for a few weeks. Good comments gents! YMMV
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-09-2012, 03:05 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,316
Re: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trnelson View Post
According to my estimates, which may well be not absolutely accurate, in my rifle the 210g vld has equal or better velocity and wind drift out to some where between 700 and 750 yards plus or minus. After that the markedly better BC of the 230 takes over and asserts itself as a better choice. Here in my neck of the woods the longest range available is 600 yards so I've never been able to validate predicted point of aim vs point of actual impact. I have found the 230 to behave actually slightly better than predicted to that range at least. I got all googly eyed with the wonderful BC when the 230 tactical OTM came on the market shortly after I purchased my rifle and just HAD to have some of them, so i bought a few hundred. I'd love to have a chance to send some off out to 1k and further validate the load. In all seriousness at the ranges I allow myself to shoot at the 210 would be "better" I haven't even attempted any shot beyond 600 with it but would love to. My thoughts on switching to the 210 are rooted in the fact that I just don't even try anything beyond 600 as it is not validated and therefor IMO not ethical to "tryout"'on game. I just dropped my rifle at the gunsmiths to have a KDF muzzlebrake mounted so I'll be without my baby for a few weeks. Good comments gents! YMMV
I agree with you 100%. Unless you cant get the 210 to shoot very well
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Seating Depth Berger 230 Hybrid OTM
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Berger Hybrid Seating Depth DZelenka Reloading 7 11-06-2012 12:46 PM
Berger seating depth test results - what do you think? bookworm Reloading 30 05-23-2012 12:26 PM
Seating depth for 300gr Berger in 338NM 6hangingc Reloading 4 03-12-2012 07:11 AM
Seating depth of 210 berger Night Hunter Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 06-01-2011 10:59 PM
berger seating depth? danshae Reloading 2 03-28-2009 03:07 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC