close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Berger Bullets

Reply

RL 17 accuracy in WSM size cases?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Unread 02-21-2013, 03:28 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Northern Idaho
Posts: 431
RL 17 accuracy in WSM size cases?

So I've been reading some posts and/or reports about the velocity gains found in Reloader 17, but what about the accuracy of using this powder?
__________________
Cole

"Only accurate rifle are interesting" Col. Townsend Whelen
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 04:57 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2001
    Posts: 1,058
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by longrangehunterII View Post
    So I've been reading some posts and/or reports about the velocity gains found in Reloader 17, but what about the accuracy of using this powder?
    this is picture of 300WSM got 1/11.25 r Kreiger barrel in McMillan stock

    http://mail.aol.com/37288-111/aol-6/...dMail&partId=3

    Great accuracy with R-17.
    __________________
    VFW
    Reply With Quote

      #3  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 05:19 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2009
    Location: Menan, Idaho
    Posts: 187
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    I second that I shoot rl 17 in my 300 wsm .5 moa but I did find it to be temp sensitive.
    __________________
    Walk quite shoot straight.
    Reply With Quote
      #4  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 05:22 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: May 2010
    Location: Lewiston, Id
    Posts: 156
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    i've had good speeds and accuracy in .300 wsm. 190 bergers 3 shot at .265 3050 fps
    Reply With Quote
      #5  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 06:55 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2007
    Location: Mountians of SW NC, near Asheville
    Posts: 1,595
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    "Pet" loads or components are myths, there is no magic in any component. The only way to find out what's "accurate" in YOUR rig is to try it.

    Unsized cases generally don't hold a bullet so that won't be an issue.

    The accuracy out of a costly custom barrel is meaningless for factory rifle shooters.
    Reply With Quote
      #6  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 07:42 PM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2001
    Posts: 1,058
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by boomtube View Post
    RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    "Pet" loads or components are myths, there is no magic in any component. The only way to find out what's "accurate" in YOUR rig is to try it.

    Unsized cases generally don't hold a bullet so that won't be an issue.

    The accuracy out of a costly custom barrel is meaningless for factory rifle shooters.
    How do you know the OP wasn't asking about his custom 6.5x300WSM since he asked same question on the Nosler site.
    __________________
    VFW
    Reply With Quote
      #7  
    Unread 02-21-2013, 07:56 PM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2013
    Location: Northern Idaho
    Posts: 431
    Re: RL 17 accuracy in WSM size cases?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by boomtube View Post
    RL 17 accuracy in WSM sized cases?

    "Pet" loads or components are myths, there is no magic in any component. The only way to find out what's "accurate" in YOUR rig is to try it.

    Unsized cases generally don't hold a bullet so that won't be an issue.

    The accuracy out of a costly custom barrel is meaningless for factory rifle shooters.
    Ok then, I'll rephrase that "RL 17 accuracy in Short Magnum size cases". I was hoping to get a consensus based upon numerous reports from users for the sole purpose of saving myself the cost and/or trouble for what might be nothing gained.

    Since it is reported to have a burn rate somewhere near H4350 and H4831, which is a broad range? I use H4350 ext. in my 8.59 Galaxy with a 210 gr. xlc..... Wow that makes me seem old! But at the time it worked very well and still does, I get 3055 fps 20' from the muzzle w/a 24" barrel. It's a lite weight gun I had made for myself, 8 lbs. w/scope, sling, ammo holder on the stock, and it has a muzzle break. Any way, I don't care to gain anything in velocity if it wouldn't still shoot under 1/2 MOA. I already have a load close to that. My 6.5/300 WSM will shoot 3/8" 100 yd. groups with 65.0 grs. of Retumbo. I was looking to use the 140 MK in place of the 140 GK I'm using now for long range target shooting. The AB's were too long as well as the Berger 140 VLD's, which left me using Sierra's because they seat with the BT taper right below the neck/shoulder junction in my 6.5/300 WSM chamber.

    The Galaxy no way, they're all seated deep into the case and compressed loads depending on which powder is used w/ which bullet. Hence why I used the 210 gr. bullet. I just wondered if it would work well enough in either gun to bother with developing another load, but then again I don't like putting to many rounds down the barrels chasing nothing gained! One day I will run out of the XLC's and the powder I used in the Galaxy, so I'll end up doing load development someday if I shoot the gun other then only using it for hunting. I don't have a lot of rounds down the tube even after more then a decade, but still it's expensive to burn up a barrel like that.

    So if anyone else has tried Reloader 17 in any of the short magnums, I'd be interested in knowing if it was more accurate then anything else you've tried?
    __________________
    Cole

    "Only accurate rifle are interesting" Col. Townsend Whelen
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:26 AM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC