Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

powder loads going down??

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-28-2011, 10:01 PM
T F T F is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Solvang CA
Posts: 235
powder loads going down??

the new books have a lower max powder load than the old books !! why ?? and is it safe to use old info? this is out of several books not just one.
__________________
Terry
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2011, 09:02 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 1,253
Re: powder loads going down??

Terry,

There's actually a couple of reasons for this. One (not surprisingly) is fear of litigation. In the early days of reloading manuals, there was some pretty scary stuff out there. Not all manuals were done with pressure testing equipment, and many were done with the same tools and tecniques available to the average handloader; micrometers and the obvious appearance of pressure signs. Today, most (but not all) pressure test their loads from start to finish, and actually adhere to SAAMI or CIP limitations in re pressure. This is not to say that the loads have been "lawyered back" as much as they have been forced to keep their data within a more narrowly defined range.

Unfortunately, I often hear or read the advice that modern maximum loads aren't really "max", and that there's a safety factor incorporated in the data. I want to be absolutely clear on this; that's total BS, at least with the firms I'm familar with. The max load listed was the max load that the range/lab determined, as is. There were no safety factors "added" to this mix, and anything beyond that merely relies on the strength of the actions to deal with what may amount to proof loads.

Another is the advancement in pressure testing equipment. In the past, pressure testing was normally done via the copper crusher method, resutling in the CUP values you'll see listed in many older manuals. Putting it bluntly, it was determined that copper crushers don't normally reveal true peak pressures. Upon firing, pressure can spike fast enough, and begin to drop again while the metal of the copper pellet is still deforming. In short, the pressure spike was faster than the pellet's abiity to measure and record it. This simple fact gives erroneously and aritifically low pressure readings, making the load appear safer than it actually is. The move to conformal transducers and piezo electric measuring equipment opened a whole new world, and allowed a much better understanding of these spikes. Again, some scary stuff was revealed. Today, this is the most common method of pressure measurment, and it's vastly better than the old CUP values. The result of this, however, is a gradual trending downward in maximum reccomended loads, as you're seeing.

The bottom line in all this, is that you want to use the latest data available, from the most current sources. If you have two or more manuals available to you from the same maker, use the newest version. Where differences between manuals appear, both of whom may be using the same pressure measuring methods, you're likely seeing the results of the effect of the difference in various components. That is, different primers, cases and bullets (even of the same weight), or even differences between lots of the "same" powder, primer etc..

In my library, I have a complete set of loading manuls from virtually all manufacturers, going back over thirty years. While there's intersting and good information in all of them, I use data from only the newest. Some of the older ones were downright scary. P.O. Ackley's manuals are a great example. Lots of wisdom and some very good information contained therein, but many of his starting loads are at (or even beyond) what we now recommend as maximum loads. Some would blow primers or badly expand primer pockets after a firing or two. Just a little something to think about.
__________________
Kevin Thomas
Lapua USA

Last edited by Kevin Thomas; 03-29-2011 at 09:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2011, 09:45 AM
T F T F is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Solvang CA
Posts: 235
Re: powder loads going down??

THANK YOU for the info I do understand now
__________________
Terry
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2011, 11:18 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 1,253
Re: powder loads going down??

My pleasure, Terry, glad to help!

My aunt and uncle used to live in Lompoc. Always enjoyed visiting them, sice we'd inevitably wind up making a trip to Solvang. Neat little area back then, though it's been many years since I've been up there. Always got the best white chocolate up there.
__________________
Kevin Thomas
Lapua USA
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2011, 12:13 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Great Falls, MT
Posts: 707
Re: powder loads going down??

Yep, being an ex-missileer I've been to Solvang a couple of times myself. It is a great little town. Great food and an absolute wonderful knife store for those of us to enjoy a good blade.

Jim
__________________

Raptor Stalker by
Kirby Allen APS
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2011, 12:16 PM
T F T F is offline
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Solvang CA
Posts: 235
Re: powder loads going down??

Kevin Solvang has grown a littel but we still have the chocolate factory .. Hunting has dropped also to many land owners that don't allow it . now we have to go out of town or like me out of state . got to go find a place to hunt the rut next year.

Jim the knife store is still here too!!
__________________
Terry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-30-2011, 12:15 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chatham, VA
Posts: 436
Re: powder loads going down??

I think the biggest issue is where certain cartridges are held back over fear about what rifle the loads might be used in. Look at the 45-70 as a perfect example. Most manuals separate loads for it based on rifle type and age but that is not the case with all rounds.

Take a look at Hodgdon's data for the 7mm Rem Mag, I just have a hard time believing there is not a throttle on that data. I have exceeded some of those loads by 5-7% in the past before even a soft Federal primer gets flattened much at all. I have seen it duplicated with a 22" barrel and great brass life, no sticky bolt, or any other significant pressure signs.
__________________
"My greatest fear is that after my demise my wife will sell my guns for the price I told her I paid for them"
-don't know where it came from...but true
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: powder loads going down??
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300 Win Mag Loads using Superperformance powder scottripplinger Reloading 1 07-04-2011 07:40 PM
Help with 22-250 loads with Vihtavuori powder Casing Reloading 1 02-14-2011 09:45 AM
Different Max Powder loads Gardien Reloading 5 12-21-2009 06:32 PM
New Loads: Powder Charge vs Seating Depth bookworm Reloading 4 09-05-2009 03:36 PM
How to convert canister powder loads to surplus values jtoews110 Reloading 2 06-22-2008 08:54 PM

Current Poll
Are you on Facebook?
Yes - 46.34%
1,120 Vote
No - 19.53%
472 Votes
No, but I may join - 1.78%
43 Votes
No way, are you kidding? - 36.08%
872 Votes
Total Votes: 2,417
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC