Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Nosler Accubond Performance

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-03-2010, 09:34 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 219
Nosler Accubond Performance

Hello All,

I took an Elk this week with a .30-06 with handloaded Nosler Accubonds. A little about the Elk. It was between 5.5 and 6.5 years old and weighed between 600 and 700 lbs according to the DNR biologist. It was a 6x6.

The handload, 53.5gr of IMR 4350 with a 180gr Nosler Accubond, Winchester Primer seated .03" off the lands. The bullet was traveling approximately 2500 fps.

Two shots taken at 210 yards. First shot was a lung shot. Very small hole on the way in, couldn't hardly get my pinky in it. Blew a 1.5" section of a rib away. Left a tiny pencil thin hole on the off side. Second shot also at 210 yards went in on the right side of the chest, opening another pencil thin hole traveled through the vitals, through the guts and exited just before the rear hind on the right side opening a nickle size hole.

So essentially I felt that there was very little expansion. I would have expected the bullet to expand on the lung shot because it hit a rib and blew a section of it out. Then on the cross the body shot I would have expected no exit wound.

What is your guys take on this type of bullet performance?

Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 09:44 AM
Gold Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NW Montana
Posts: 803
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance

Our experience has been quite different but we are pushing them from 300wsm,300 win,and 300 ultra. We have had large wound channels and unfortunatley alot of blood shot. No far shots though longest was 350,closest only 30 yards.I think if you went to 165's the results may be slightly different.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 09:50 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 183
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance

That bullet might be a little better suited in a larger chambering. I would guess the lighter accubond might be a better choice for expansion. Or if you wanted to stay with the 180 the ballistic tip would probably open better. The partition would be a good choice for those ranges and they have a really good track record. I have seen alot of deer and elk shot with the 180 grain accubond and they all preformed well, but they started 630 fps faster.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 09:55 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Longmont, Colorado
Posts: 325
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance

The last Elk I shot was at 220 yards, and I put one through the shoulder from a 7mm (160 gr. Accubond at 2950 FPS). It went through all the bone and the old girl dropped on the spot. A little earlier I shot a mulie at 165 with the same load, and it literally fell over with out moving its hoofs. In this case there was a small entrance wound (pencil sized), no exit, and NO blood. There was massive organ damage. I'd suggest dropping the weight down a little and driving them faster.
If you like your hunting rifle, you can keep your hunting rifle.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 10:29 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 219
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance

Sounds like I need to go faster. I'll try that on some deer for this year hunting season before I give up on this bullet weight.

Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 04:18 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Las Cruces, NM
Posts: 156
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance

For starters, you are pushing a bullet designed to hold together at speeds over 3000 fps velocity, at only 2500 fps. Second you went through over 2 feet of critter. The bullet will have slowed down a lot by the time it exited. I am actually surprised it exited. I would not expect a large exit from a 30-06 at 200 yards on an elk. If you hit large bones, I could see more damage but not for a lung shot.

Personally, I see no need for premium bullets from a 30-06. Standard bullets will work just fine, cause more trauma, penetrate enough to do the job, and hold up well enough due to moderate velocity.
Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2010, 04:24 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 219
Re: Nosler Accubond Performance


I agree with everything your saying. I chose the Accubond because of the BC. I dialed the load down because this is where I was seeing the best accuracy.

I'm actually pretty happy things went the way they did. The other hunter in our camp was using a Remington Coreloc and he lost a lot of meat with a well placed shot. I lost maybe 1.5 lbs.

Just figured I'd see a bit more expansion than I saw.

Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Nosler Accubond Performance
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
whats the difference between Winchester Accubond and Nosler Accubond? matt_3479 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 06-29-2011 03:30 PM
Terminal Performance - Accubond vs SST kiwicharlie Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 05-22-2011 12:39 PM
180 gr 30 cal N Accubond performance britz Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 11-16-2009 03:49 PM
Accubond performance on elk sambo3006 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 10-25-2005 06:07 PM
Nosler 200 Accubond performance D.P. Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 7 03-15-2005 12:27 PM

Current Poll
In the last 12 months, what was your longest rifle kill on big game?
0 to 200 yards - 25.95%
1,531 Vote
201 to 400 yards - 32.12%
1,895 Vote
401 to 600 yards - 23.09%
1,362 Vote
601 to 800 yards - 10.00%
590 Votes
801 to 1,000 yards - 3.92%
231 Votes
Over 1,000 yards - 4.92%
290 Votes
Total Votes: 5,899
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC