Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Loading for a 264 Win Mag

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-06-2012, 08:42 PM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 96
Loading for a 264 Win Mag

I am thinking about building a 264 Win Mag here in the near future. I have been looking at the reloading manuals that I have.... Sierra, Hornady, Nosler and the new Berger. The Sierra manual states that the throat on factory 264's is too short and that it makes it hard to handload for the 264 as the bullet has to be seated to deep. The other manuals dont say anything about this.

My question is: Is the 264 hard to handload for? What are some of your favorite loads using the 140 grain bullet.... Mostly shoot Burger bullets but I am open to any.

Any advise here would be great.


Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 02:52 AM
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 13
Re: Loading for a 264 Win Mag

Ryan, I just posted a similiar question about seating depth.

"I have a Ruger Hawkeye 77 in .264 and am currently shooting 130 grain Nosler Accubonds over .5 grain below max of RL19; I believe its 58.0 grains. Don't know if anyone has a similair experience but my handloads wont chamber at the COAL of 3.340. I've had to shorten mine to 3.240 for them to chamber. It will chamber Remington factory 140's without a problem. Can't understand why. I really can't complain tho. This load shoots just a hair over a half inch and its not anywhere near a compressed load.
Anyone have a similiar issue or know why this may be?"

So, yes, I have had to shorten my COAL, but accuracy is excellent with the 130 AB. And no, to be honest, it was easy to work up a good load for mine. In fact, RL19 was the first powder I tried and results were so good I felt no need to go any further at this time. Hope this helps.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 09:43 AM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Colorado
Posts: 96
Re: Loading for a 264 Win Mag

That does help! Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. I keep going back and forth between the 264 and the 6.5-06. A really close family friend shot one when I was a kid (the 264) and thats why I want one. There are some really good memories there. Plus I think it would be an amazing antelope round. So I guess I need to finish rebuilding my bolt and get the barrel ordered....

Again thanks

Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2012, 08:04 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,028
Re: Loading for a 264 Win Mag

If you are having built a custom rifle you can have them put what length throat you want in it. I have a custom built 264 Win mag with a Shilen 27 3/4" long barrel. I did not have the rifle built so I did not have a say so in the throat length. I load 130 Nosler Accubonds 3.450 COAL and that is 20 thousands off the lands. I am loading 66.5 grs Retumbo in cases made from Winchester 7mm Rem mag run through the 264 Win FL sizer and lit by CCI 250s and I average 3350 fps and half MOA accuracy. Get your barrel on the 264 Win mag at least 26" longer is better. If you want a 24" barrel you might as well go with the 6.5-06 because you want gain much over it with the 264 Win mag and the barrel will last you a lot longer. If you want your rifle to use 140 VLDs loaded out long make you up a dummy round the length you want and send it to the gunsmith doing the barrel so he can throat it. Just make sure that the length will work through your magazine.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: Loading for a 264 Win Mag
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Loading for a .300 RUM durak Long Range Hunting & Shooting 11 06-16-2011 07:55 PM
Loading the 285 in the .338 NM Too Tall Rosenwald Reloading 6 04-26-2011 06:03 PM
Loading a .308? kc Reloading 8 11-12-2009 11:51 AM
Loading for .30-.338 Lap imp? RockyMtnMT Reloading 2 06-21-2008 07:15 PM
Loading for 300 WSM nite owl Reloading 4 05-17-2008 07:58 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 29.88%
49 Votes
NO - 54.88%
90 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.24%
25 Votes
Total Votes: 164
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC