Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

IMR VS Hogden 4831

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-13-2009, 02:23 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 194
IMR VS Hogden 4831

Is there much difference between these 2 powders, as far as a 300 wm is concerned?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-13-2009, 05:02 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 430
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

These are not similar powders. All they share is the numeric designation.

Last edited by Winchester 69; 10-13-2009 at 10:07 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-13-2009, 05:28 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,338
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

Until recently they were different companys.
Truly, I never understood the similarity in numbering, and wish Hodgdon had stayed away from IMR.

I use both, but IMR is better for some cartridges, it's more consistant lot-to-lot, and as temp stable(if not more so) than Hodgdon, despite the hype.
I don't like them fiddling with good ole reliable IMR.

Anyway, do not assume they are the same because of the number designations.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-13-2009, 07:03 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,146
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

Quote:
Originally Posted by Winchester 69 View Post
These are not similar powders. All they share are the numeric designation.
Hmmmm - these two powders are always found together on the burn rate chart for a reason. They have very similar burn rate characteristics. In my experience they vary very little in actual use. A load could be tailored with either one. That's not to say they are the same or directly interchangeable, just very similar in their use.

Just my 2 cents from using both powders in a few cartridges.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2009, 07:52 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: NC, oceanfront
Posts: 3,338
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

This is an exmple of my basis for significant differences:
On a 6.5WSSM running 47.4gr IMR 4350, I get 3040fps with Lapua 139s..
Quickload 'what-ifs' for 55Kpsi(my pressure) AND </=100% case fill, all else equal:

IMR4350 comes right to the top at 98%fill and 3044fps.
Interesting and related in order below are:

Hodgdon H380 95%fill and 3033fps (needing same 47.4gr)
IMR 4831 100%fill and 2988fps
Hodgdon H414 90%fill and 2988fps
Hodgdon H4350 100%fill and 2966 (needing 48.6gr)

This tells me that H380 is closer to IMR4350 than H4350.

There were 15 other powders between these. And, in this case, any listed could be used safely. They just can't be assumed as same, and for sure one will best the others in your gun.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-14-2009, 08:59 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 194
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

Thanks for the information. Which one meters better as far as the powder dispenser?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-14-2009, 10:37 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 507
Re: IMR VS Hogden 4831

Quote:
Originally Posted by samson View Post
Thanks for the information. Which one meters better as far as the powder dispenser?
H4831SC
Same burn characteristics as H4831 but shorter kernels for better flow through the powder measurer.

James
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: IMR VS Hogden 4831
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imr 4831 sc Geno22 Reloading 6 07-19-2010 09:41 AM
Edge with H-4831 alf Reloading 2 04-19-2010 08:12 AM
IMR 4831 Go to powder for what? jmason Reloading 15 05-28-2009 09:36 AM
4831 for 160 gr Barnes in 7mm rem mag? scottys Reloading 7 03-23-2009 03:28 PM
IMR 4831?? samson Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 2 11-08-2005 07:40 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC