Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-17-2008, 11:57 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,524
Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

22-250AI shooting 80gr Berger VLD 8" twist 26" BBL. H4831 43grs produced avg MV of 3,340 with a couple of cases with shinny ejector marks.... 39grs of IMR 4007 produced avg of 3,365 with no pressure signs. Both produced about same accuracy 1/2 MOA at 100. What is happening in chamber? I thought the slow burners were the ticket when firing heavy bullets....
__________________
How does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-18-2008, 10:14 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: MS
Posts: 1,652
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

IronWorker,

I havent looked on a burn rate chart, but didnt think there was that much difference between thos two to make much of a difference....have you tried any VV560 or RL22? I do not load for the 22-250 but do a good bit of reloading for a 22-6.5x47 lapua which has about the same capacity.

I think that all of the traditional pressure signs that people see are from the initial shock of the bullet leaving the case and engaging the lands which creates a pressure spike which dissapates as the projectile proceeds down the barrel thus creating a larger pressure vessel.
__________________
I admit that I know just enough to be dangerous.....but dangerous at ever extending distances.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-19-2008, 08:53 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 558
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

Iron Worker,
You show muzzle velocities of the two loads but how about the SD numbers. IMR4007ssc is in the same burn rate as H380 that would be a great powder for 50grain bullets but for 80's I am guessing the SD is high.
If your rifle does not like H4831 tinker with other powders in the appropriate burn rate like IMR4831 on the fast side and N165 ,RL22 and IMR7828 on the slow side and when chronographing try and find a load that has good muzzle velocity and single digit SD numbers.
Your most consistent load with good muzzle velocity is 1000 times better than the fastest load with a SD of 50.
UB
__________________
Attitude:
It takes 43 muscle's to frown and 17 to smile, but only 3 for proper trigger pull.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-19-2008, 09:16 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,524
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

Out of 5 rnds 3,341 3,333 3,345 3,345,3,362 3,347 Main thing is there were no apparent pressure signs with the fast burner. I tried RE#22 the SD was 50 FPS between 3 shots. Thanks
__________________
How does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-03-2008, 09:36 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: LV NV
Posts: 59
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

As the caliber diminishes the need for a relatively faster powder for best accuracy increases. Just because a powder will fit into a case that does not make it the best choice. I've been loading the .22/250 since 1966 and (of course lighter bullets) but the powder then was the H380 or IMR 4064. IMR 3031 gave excellent velocity and accuracy as well (52 grain bullets) The magnum mind we have all adapted to calls out for us to use the charcoal, but the powder fouling and in accuracy issues plague us. Then there is the cartridge case issues which make some propellants more desirable than others, heck the 6.5/284 loves the H4350, so would you consider that a fast or slow powder?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-04-2008, 12:07 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Reno Nevada
Posts: 1,524
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

H4350 is a medium slow burner,burns slower then what you listed but faster then H4831 and we know there a many many slower burning powders then H4831.
__________________
How does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-22-2011, 08:46 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Gillette, Wy
Posts: 83
Re: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????

Quote:
Originally Posted by eddybo View Post
IronWorker,

I havent looked on a burn rate chart, but didnt think there was that much difference between thos two to make much of a difference....have you tried any VV560 or RL22? I do not load for the 22-250 but do a good bit of reloading for a 22-6.5x47 lapua which has about the same capacity.

I think that all of the traditional pressure signs that people see are from the initial shock of the bullet leaving the case and engaging the lands which creates a pressure spike which dissapates as the projectile proceeds down the barrel thus creating a larger pressure vessel.


+1 on what this guy said.
I run 75gr Berger, 42.0gr of N560, 3400 fps.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Fast powder vs Slow powder ????
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fast Powder Ed-WI Muzzleloader Hunting 5 04-28-2010 09:17 PM
Slow Powder New Brass= Black Crap?? Nape.270 Reloading 7 08-11-2009 02:56 PM
Slow powder in Oklahoma abinok Guns For Sale 5 04-13-2006 07:19 AM
Slow Powder for Oklahoma? abinok Reloading 3 04-12-2006 07:50 AM
Powder Too Slow? Kevin Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 7 03-09-2006 12:54 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC