Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Bullet Sorting Question

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-11-2008, 02:59 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 824
Bullet Sorting Question

How are most of you sorting bullets for your handloads? I am weighing 180 gr accubonds and only keeping the 179.9 to 180.1. And with 270 cal 150 gr Patitions, I am trying to only keep the 149.9 to 150.1 but will end up losing half of the box if I stick to this. Is this too picky?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-11-2008, 04:31 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 430
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

Are those the tolerances you have determined that will control the vertical spread to your liking?
.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-11-2008, 06:34 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: east central fl. /n.c. pa.
Posts: 652
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moman View Post
How are most of you sorting bullets for your handloads? I am weighing 180 gr accubonds and only keeping the 179.9 to 180.1. And with 270 cal 150 gr Patitions, I am trying to only keep the 149.9 to 150.1 but will end up losing half of the box if I stick to this. Is this too picky?
i became involved in loading for rifles in 1951 when my father got a pacific super press, pacific dies, a redding balance scale, and a belding & mull powder measure. i still use the scale, and the powder measure. my son still uses the press.
i load for hunting, and we only hunt long range.
i only use match grade bullets, but they can vary also. that said, ive never weighed a bullet for my hunting loads.
seems today loading has become so sofisticated, we can constantly be questioning what we do. certainly others will question what we do.
your obviously a hunter, else you wouldnt be using those bullets.

how much accuracy is required to do what you do? are you satisfied with your results? these are the important issues to my mind at least.
tempting as it is, i wont allow myself to get caught up in what some have come to think is necessary for success. what works, works for me. and that dosent include weighing bullets.
frankly, i even question the necessity of weighing each powder charge. ever notice how much difference in point of impact a half grain makes while testing loads? none.
a little experiment on slight differences in bullet weight and powder charges might answer your question.
how far can you go, before you begin seeing a difference in point of impact that would affect the accuracy you need.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-11-2008, 09:15 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 558
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moman View Post
How are most of you sorting bullets for your handloads? I am weighing 180 gr accubonds and only keeping the 179.9 to 180.1. And with 270 cal 150 gr Patitions, I am trying to only keep the 149.9 to 150.1 but will end up losing half of the box if I stick to this. Is this too picky?
On the 180gr accubonds and 150gr partitions .2 grains is insignificant (in weight) compared to bearing surface length.
Measure your bullets more closely than you weigh them for long range performance.
UB
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:03 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,009
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

just because you sort them doesn't mean you need to get rid of any. Just sort them by weight and keep each weight together throughout the process.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:26 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 551
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

+1 from what I've read from the people who truly care about accuracy and tiny little groups - benchresters - length of bearing surface is more important to accuracy then weight (in the small inrements that we are talking about). Then again, if you can sort by both bearing surface and then weight within those bearing surface groups, you would provide the greatest possibility of shooting consistent groups. Sadly, you'd never get out to the garage to do any hunting.....

All that being said, I sorted my Berger 180 gr 7mm bullets for F-Class by weight for one set of bullets, and then by length of base to ogive for a different set of bullets. The base to ogive groups seemed to give slightly better results at 1K.

JeffVN
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-13-2008, 12:02 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,844
Re: Bullet Sorting Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by JeffVN View Post
+1 from what I've read from the people who truly care about accuracy and tiny little groups - benchresters - length of bearing surface is more important to accuracy then weight (in the small inrements that we are talking about). Then again, if you can sort by both bearing surface and then weight within those bearing surface groups, you would provide the greatest possibility of shooting consistent groups. Sadly, you'd never get out to the garage to do any hunting.....

All that being said, I sorted my Berger 180 gr 7mm bullets for F-Class by weight for one set of bullets, and then by length of base to ogive for a different set of bullets. The base to ogive groups seemed to give slightly better results at 1K.

JeffVN
Pretty good put there--don't worry about weight just bearing surface.
__________________
The Truth Is Not Always Good For Business!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Bullet Sorting Question
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bullet Comparator for sorting bullets? Jinx-) Reloading 19 04-18-2012 11:37 PM
Bullet sorting for LR consistency? esshup Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 11 03-18-2011 09:17 PM
Case sorting??? Firearrow Reloading 51 01-27-2011 12:16 PM
How picky to get with new brass sorting tlk Reloading 14 11-01-2010 06:25 PM
Question about brass sorting bgordon Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 1 09-10-2002 02:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC