Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

berger vld or barnes for long range

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 05-06-2013, 09:34 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: north texas
Posts: 18
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
I have done it or my own version of Eric's many times. Results have jumped off the target at times. But always there is a noticeable difference.

Jeff
whats ur version
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-06-2013, 09:39 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,739
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaymac View Post
whats ur version
I start with 3 of each, -.030~-,040" off, then -.080~-.090" off and -.120" and go from there.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-06-2013, 10:05 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,424
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Can't comment for the Elk factor, but I have dropped many whitetails at 500+ the Barnes Triple-Shocks and Accubonds over the years.

I recently started testing with Berger VLD's but have not had the chance to shoot any game with them. I will report my findings this hunting season.

For that caliber, game size, and range, I'd think the 180 VLD will be your best bet.
__________________
"I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

"Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

Ignore everything I say, because I have a reading comprehension and memory problem...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-06-2013, 11:14 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 268
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Quote:
Originally Posted by Broz View Post
Berger and use a heavy for caliber offering. They are two completely different bullets, what one gives up close, the other gives up at long range. I use Bergers because they work best for me at the longest distance I will shoot, but they also do a good job up close where I can be sure of better placement.

Jeff
Well said.

I have have made no attempt to hide my dislike for non controlled expansion bullets up close, but at 700yds and beyond you really don't have a choice.
You sure as hell do not want to shoot a Barnes or Accubond out of their respective expansion range or you can be guaranteed a pin hole.

As suggested by Jeff, broadside shot selection basically assures instant death even if the bullets goes off like a bomb...It just doesn't have to penetrate far at all.
For this thinking I am a 100% buyer.

The new Accubond promises to expand down to 1300fps...so there is hope yet for us controlled expansion types!
Also Kirby Allen did some long range experiments with the 265TTSX out of his 338AX. IIRC he said the BC was significantly higher than quoted at the elevated 338 Lapua improved velocities.
Anybody remember anything about that?
I have 20 boxes of those things...
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-06-2013, 11:21 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,739
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Quote:
Originally Posted by X-man View Post
...It just doesn't have to penetrate far at all....
True!

But for the record, We shot a quartering bull at 200 ish yards last fall with a 215 Hybrid from my 300 win. It stopped short of an exit in the front of the far shoulder with (if I remember correctly?) was 26" and I put a 1" wide tape in the wound channel when we skinned him.

Jeff

Edit: look here. Comparing the Berger 210 VLD to the 215 Hybrid

Started whacking bulls on page 14 of the thread. The final results of the 200 yards shot are on page 17 post #118
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-07-2013, 12:06 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 5,424
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

So the 215 Hybrid has that much better expansion and penetration thN the 210 VLD?
__________________
"I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

"Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

Ignore everything I say, because I have a reading comprehension and memory problem...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-07-2013, 07:59 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Townsend, Montana.
Posts: 7,739
Re: berger vld or barnes for long range

Quote:
Originally Posted by MudRunner2005 View Post
So the 215 Hybrid has that much better expansion and penetration thN the 210 VLD?
I have killed a boat load of elk , deer and other game with 210 VLD's and never tracked one. But the .696 BC brought me to the 215. When I seen the accuracy of the 215 in my rifle I was pretty excited. In my opinion the 215 will expand better due to it's much larger hollow point cavity up front. I look for this for my longest shots. The antelope I took at 1285 yards was a complete pass through and exit was about 1 1/4 to 1 1/2"

Every single 215 we put into game, (19 last season) had a .308 entrance hole. Some stopped at the off side ribs, these were shots under 500 or so. But shots on antelope and deer 300 or less still exited. It seemed after 650 yards they all exited with the same .308 entrance and a nice 1 1/4 to 1 1/2" exit. I encourage people to go to that thread and see the results for their selves. It is all documented with 19 kills, same season, same rifle. There is impact velocity, distance, shot placement and terminal damage. After reviewing that thread you can then decide if the bullets performance at many different distances, on many different animals, is what you seek.

Jeff
__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Spot & Stalk or Ambush For Western Deer?
MOSTLY - Spot & Stalk - 73.62%
1,010 Vote
MOSTLY - Ambush - 26.38%
362 Votes
Total Votes: 1,372
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC