Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

Anybody have any ideas?

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 07-08-2009, 09:31 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 183
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

How many rounds through the barrel total?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-08-2009, 09:57 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

No more than 5 or 6 hundred
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-08-2009, 10:36 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 21
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

Averaging three 5 shot groups is what most use to determine the rifle's accuracy potential. Statistically, that really isn't enough of a sample, but it is probably the most practical.

Unfortunately, it is possible that your groups may not really be all over the place. Get your barrel down to a clean bore using a good copper solvent after you scrub out all of the carbon. Fire 3 or 4 sighters to foul the bore and then try a ten shot group. Allow plenty of time for the barrel to cool between shots. That will tell you how the rifle actually shoots. You probably won't like the fact that some of those fliers are not really fliers at all, but simply part of the group.

You may find that your load is not up to snuff, regardless of the fact that velocities are consistent. You need to find the best bullet/powder combination before you worry about tightening up velocities. It doesn't matter what bullet or powder everybody else's rifle likes. It only matters what your rifle likes.

Work up your loads using bullets of the same weight from two different bullet makers. Pick two bullets that you could be happy with and disregard your preconceived preference. Let your rifle dictate which one it likes.

From the wealth of reloading data available today, you will find that are usually two powders that stand out from the crowd. Try the two powders that are most frequently cited as the the most accurate or the best hunting load from various sources and load rounds for each bullet with both powders.

Once you find which bullet and powder combination your rifle likes, you can move on to tuning your load. The ladder method (several variations) works fine.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-08-2009, 10:57 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oregon City, OR
Posts: 481
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

I know your frustration. You think you found the sweet sot, then BOOM! It goes to hell.

I hate to say this, but it might not be a loading issue, it may be a gun issue. It says you’re shooting a 308.

This is how I would approach it:
1. Buy some Federal Gold Match in 175’s or 168 and shoot some factory ammo. Most 308’s will shoot FGM as good as most hand loads. This would be to determine a base line. Shoot all 20 over the chronograph.

The .25 moa groups might just be flukes. .25 MOA groups do not grow on trees. If I were to guess the 5r is a .7 to .85 MOA gun.

2. Then start loading form there. After you shoot your 3 shot groups and find the best group. Try loading some .1 and .2 over and under that load to fine tune.

Are you shooting single feed or Mag length. Most 308 mag will only hold a 2.800 OAL. I would tune a powder charge instead of a seating depth. The 308 and SMK handle a jump just fine.

What powder. Most find 43-45grs of Varget behind a 175 SMK seated at 2.800 to be satisfactory for a 308.

Also check out snipershide.com in the reloading section. They have a great 308 load section.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-09-2009, 09:10 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mountians of SW NC, near Asheville
Posts: 1,596
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

"one will be under a quarter inch and then 4 groups in a row will be close to and inch and a half."

Actually, it isn't "magic" working against you. The close shooting groups are just the laws of chance or, as the math gurus call it, "a statistical anomally." Meaning your "great groups" are likely just the result of chance and is NOT representitive of the grouping qualities of that load.

Toss a handfull of rocks at a wall. Note that somewhere on the wall the you can easily find several impacts quite close together but that means nothing to do with the overall pattern.

Some of your groups will show that same kind of random chance as well. By pure chance, any 3 or 5 rounds may cluster together but the real accuracy is displayed by the widest shots in the total number fired. Thus, larger groups are usually showing what our rifle is doing with that load, not an occasional small group.

This is especially true if we are test firing a sequence of loads for groups. If the charge (or seating) steps are small, large groups are unlikely to suddenly shrink tremendously and then get much larger immediatly after any one test load. Only groups tending to shrink as we approach a good point and then tapering back out as the charge is increases is likely to "prove" anything. I prefer to test 3 shot groups in no more than .3 gr. steps to show the group progression better. Even then, I'm not surprised to later find some small groups aren't repeatable.

I consider the size target I can hit - everytime - is my true accruacy. Averaging serves to smooth out the effects of the wider shots and merge them into a smaller mathmatical composite. IMHO, that's not a really good thing to do, I can't hit anything with math, I have to use my rifle. So, for me, averaging becomes a means of happy-side self delusion.

Last edited by boomtube; 07-09-2009 at 09:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-09-2009, 12:51 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sedalia, MO
Posts: 1,253
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

Gotta agree with Boomtube here. Few shooters really do what the beancounters refer to as statistically significant analysis of their loads. This can involve LOTS of shooting, if you really want to verify something like this. Fortunatley, most of us don't need to. A good load, one that shoots reliably well (but may not be the "true" best load) is perfectly fine. For what it's worth, Lake City Army Ammunition Plant used to require six 14-shot groups @ 200 yards for a certification of a given lot of bullets. This was later modified to ten 10-shot groups @ 300 meters, and this is what is used today. A bit more trouble than most of us want to go through. For my own stuff, I'm willing to take whatever time I need to eliminate those loads which give funky anomolies and deliver whatever level of accuracy I need for that particular application, Beyond that, hey, you can easily shoot out a barrel looking for the ultimate load, without ever having tested all the variables involved. Life's too short. Develop a good load, and run with it!

Kevin
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-09-2009, 01:19 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 19
Re: Anybody have any ideas?

Thanks for all of the help. Im beginning to think i might have just gotten lucky on those few small groups.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Anybody have any ideas?
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
any ideas please screech General Discussion 8 01-10-2011 01:22 AM
Need some ideas for my XP blipelt Specialty Handgun Hunting 26 04-30-2010 08:17 PM
Any ideas buck Coyote Hunting - From 10 Yards to over 1,000 Yards 7 02-09-2009 04:49 PM
What is this? Any ideas? 7mmSendaro General Discussion 5 10-26-2007 08:22 AM
Need Pod Ideas for a Heavy Gun augustinaustin Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 12-28-2002 01:23 PM

Current Poll
Do you plan to buy a new custom rifle in the next 12 months?
YES - Of course - 72.96%
1,651 Vote
NO - wife/girlfriend won't let me. - 27.04%
612 Votes
Total Votes: 2,263
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC