Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-10-2011, 09:19 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 89
7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

I'm getting low velocities for a given amount of powder (according to load manuals); here are a few loads I've tried.
IMR7828 65g 2884fps, H4831SC 64g 2811FPS, Reloader25 66g 2786FPS, Reloader17 61g 2980fps all using Federal Mag. Match primers.
This is a new rifle I'm breaking in, itís a Defiance Mutant long action with a 27 inch Brux 1:9 twists throated for the Berger 180 grain vld. Case OAL is 3.15" using Berger's 180 grain hybrid vld bullets. I've tried 4 different powders and they are all giving the same results. As I get close to maximum load the velocity is lower than what I would expect but I'm not showing any pressure signs at all. Primers look good and no resistance at all when you lift the bolt and I've verified the chronograph against two others.
I think the long throat is giving me more capacity compared to one that has half the bullet inside the case and it's just going to take more powder to get the same results. One thing that's odd is you would think the slowest powder (RE25) would produce higher velocities than the faster powders in this circumstance.
Has anybody seen this before?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-10-2011, 10:38 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas
Posts: 200
Re: 7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

I have a 7mm WSM built on a long action Stiller with a 25in. Brux. I had to get up to 66gr H4831SC or 67gr H1000 to get speeds in the 2900-3000. You will, of course, need to work up.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-10-2011, 11:17 AM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Patagonia Mountains, Arizona
Posts: 758
Re: 7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lisagrantb View Post
I'm getting low velocities for a given amount of powder (according to load manuals); here are a few loads I've tried.
IMR7828 65g 2884fps, H4831SC 64g 2811FPS, Reloader25 66g 2786FPS, Reloader17 61g 2980fps all using Federal Mag. Match primers.
This is a new rifle I'm breaking in, it’s a Defiance Mutant long action with a 27 inch Brux 1:9 twists throated for the Berger 180 grain vld. Case OAL is 3.15" using Berger's 180 grain hybrid vld bullets. I've tried 4 different powders and they are all giving the same results. As I get close to maximum load the velocity is lower than what I would expect but I'm not showing any pressure signs at all. Primers look good and no resistance at all when you lift the bolt and I've verified the chronograph against two others.
I think the long throat is giving me more capacity compared to one that has half the bullet inside the case and it's just going to take more powder to get the same results. One thing that's odd is you would think the slowest powder (RE25) would produce higher velocities than the faster powders in this circumstance.
Has anybody seen this before?
No, since I don'have a rifle chambered in 7mm WSM. However I do have other rifles which use longer than SAAMI length COAL and I use Quickload regularly to predict their performance. Its usually within 50 fps for 3000 fps cartridges.

Here are Quickload simulatiions assuming a 27 inch barrel with a 180 Berger seated to 3.15" COAL. All other inputs are Quickload defaults.

65 grain IMR 7828 : 2949 fps @ 58271 psi - a reasonable load - I'd use it .
64 grain H4831sc: 2879 fps @ 58329 psi - a reasonable load
66 grain RL 25: 2891 fps @ 54424 psi - 67 grains would be more reasonable. 2929 fps.
61 grain RL 17: 2982 fps @ 69432 - OVER SAAMI MAX PRESSURE

The results you're getting aren't unreasonable. Without being there it's hard to know what might be wrong, if anything. Have you measured the actual case capacity of your fired brass? Quickload assumes 81.1 grains H2O. Quickload also assumes the bullet is seated close to but not on the lands as the default.

Disclaimer: Quicklload is only as good as the info given and assumptions made. Always work up loads carefully and watch for pressure signs.

Last edited by LouBoyd; 10-10-2011 at 11:21 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-10-2011, 12:57 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 89
Re: 7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

Thanks guys, haven't checked case volume but measurements of fired cases look good but I will check and I'm .015" off the lands. I will work up slowly and see what happens. I would be happy with 2950ish with no pressure signs, I don't like to push the envelop, especially with a potential barrel burner like the 7wsm.

One guy sugested I slug the barrel to make sure it's not oversized.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:37 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 89
Re: 7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.

Well I worked my way up from 66 grains to 70 of RL25 and got to 2975FPS and still no signs of pressure at all. The load density for 70 grains of RE25 is about 95%, I think I will play around with this load to see if it will deliver.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 7MM WSM velocity verses powder charge question.
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
300 RUM powder charge LReich Reloading 0 07-15-2009 01:30 PM
Light powder charge for .270 Blacktail Reloading 10 08-16-2007 08:33 PM
Ball verses Extruded powder Cruizin Reloading 6 02-13-2007 07:55 AM
Powder Charge Jim Hundley Reloading 11 07-17-2006 10:11 PM
Vectan powder verses hodgdon varget Gerald89 Reloading 2 03-20-2006 05:11 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC