Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

4831SC in my 270 win???

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2011, 05:03 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 61
4831SC in my 270 win???

I have 130gr BST's for my Ruger M77 270 WIN and i have loaded them over 59gr's of 4831SC. This gun has been very accurate with anything I have loaded in it before but this is the first time I have used either this bullet or this powder. I am getting very erratic grouping. Do you think it is over loaded? Do I need to reduce the loading because of the short cut powder? Hodgdon says that 60 is max with regular 4831 but I was curios if the short cut packs better for a denser charge? 59gr should be 59gr right?? Any help would be great I have heard great things about this combo and would love to make it work for me.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2011, 07:33 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thunder Basin, WY
Posts: 1,788
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

In my experience, rifles are more picky about the bullet used than the powder used, generally speaking of course.

If you really want to use this bullet, you could try a couple different charge weights with said powder and bullet, and maybe even a couple diffferent seating depths with same, but if that doesn't show any promise.....perhaps the gun just doesn't like that particular bullet.? Especially if it's a known accurate rifle that's proven itself before with other bullets.

4831SC should be a fine powder to use in 270, it always done me well in 25-06 with heavy bullets and 6mm rem. and 243AI too for that matter. Alot of folks say it's good in 300 WSM as well, I don't know of any reason why it wouldn't work well in a 270.

Good Luck,
__________________
Aim small = Miss small
SBruce

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2011, 07:38 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 61
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

i was thinking about seating depths. I have it loaded out to max for magazine loading. I have, though, with others loaded closer to the lands and shot singly for varmints or bench/target shooting. that maybe it. i will try loading them out a little and shooting them on the bench. doesn't help making it into a hunting load though. guess I will have to go back to speers.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-06-2011, 07:47 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Thunder Basin, WY
Posts: 1,788
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

How far off the lands is your maximum "mag tolerable length"?? If it's only .015 or .030 off the lands, then it may not hurt to try seating in deaper at .070 to .100 off the lands. Contrary to popular belief, some bullets simply don't like to be up close and personal with the rifleling, some do. Only way to tell for sure is try it.?
__________________
Aim small = Miss small
SBruce

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-06-2011, 08:06 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,254
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

Quote:
Originally Posted by greggohrc View Post
I have 130gr BST's for my Ruger M77 270 WIN and i have loaded them over 59gr's of 4831SC. This gun has been very accurate with anything I have loaded in it before but this is the first time I have used either this bullet or this powder. I am getting very erratic grouping. Do you think it is over loaded? Do I need to reduce the loading because of the short cut powder? Hodgdon says that 60 is max with regular 4831 but I was curios if the short cut packs better for a denser charge? 59gr should be 59gr right?? Any help would be great I have heard great things about this combo and would love to make it work for me.
If this is the only load you have tried, you clearly need to experiment. Be sure that whatever you do, you only change one thing at a time. This allows you the measure the effect of the change.

Is your current load overloaded? are you seeing any pressure signs? e.g. ejector marks on the case head, flattened primer, heavy bolt lift.

H4831SC is a good powder for the 270. A buddy of mine with a 270 had read that RL22 was the go-to powder for the 270. After much failed testing with RL22, he tried H4831SC and it was almost magic.
__________________
I'm not gonna shoot here. I'm gonna shoot waaaaaaaay over there!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-06-2011, 09:19 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,090
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

My own personal experience on two different barrels on the same action is:
  1. 4831 is 4831 whether its ssc or not.
  2. 4831 is too slow for a 130 class bullet.
  3. 4831 is not the optimum powder that it was when there were not other choices
  4. Non magnum primers will produce better accuracy than mag primers.
  5. For a test case load up some Hornady 140 SPBTs with the rear of the crimping groove exactly at the case mouth. Bet it works.
  6. RL-22 with non mag primers (cci-200 for example) with 140 NABs should do very well. If not dink with seating depth.
  7. 4350 is a better choice for 130 class bullets than is 4831, for velocity production.
__________________
I may be the slowest guy on the mountain . . . . but . . . . I'm on the mountain!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2011, 01:35 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,608
Re: 4831SC in my 270 win???

It may not be optimal, but I worked up a quick sub-moa load in my 270 win a while back using 130gr Bergers and h4831sc because that's what I had on hand.

I get about 3,000 fps with 130gr Bergers, 59.8gr H4831sc, Fed 210M's, and Nosler brass out of an FN Mauser 98 action with a 25" Shilen barrel. That's near max in my rifle in 100 degree weather. Be sure to start low and work up.

I never bothered to tinker further because I'm waiting on the 165 Matrix's to arrive any day now.

-- richard
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 4831SC in my 270 win???
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6mm 105 Amax 4831sc 243 load Sharpshooter243 Reloading 5 08-04-2010 01:45 PM
Hodgdon 4831 and 4831sc?? Tikkamike Reloading 7 04-20-2010 07:54 PM
300rum / h 4831sc ?? JEREMY logan Reloading 4 05-08-2009 06:26 PM
Hodgdon: 4831 vs. 4831SC highcotton Reloading 2 01-06-2009 07:23 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.06%
67 Votes
NO - 51.20%
107 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.75%
35 Votes
Total Votes: 209
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC