Quote:
Originally Posted by j-man
A load that performs well at 100 that has high es/sd numbers will perform poorly as you reach further out.
This is why it is not only important for a load to be accurate at short range, but consistent enough in velocity to be accurate at long range.
|
'Tain't necessarily so.
Years ago, when several of us developed the load for Sierra's 155-gr. Palma bullet in the .308 Win. case, the load that the lab tested and produced the lowest spread in muzzle velocity and peak pressure was the least accurate of a couple dozen loads tested. The one we ended up using had a little less than average numbers for velocity and pressure, but it was the most accurate. Shot well under 4 inches at 600 yards in spite of 3/10ths grain powder charge weight spread.
Lake City Arsenal's M852 match ammo with Sierra 168's had about 42 grains of IMR4895. They used a charge weight that produced best accuracy within pressure and velocity specs. And best accuracy didn't always have the lowest spreads in averages for these two things.