Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Berger Bullets


300WSM compressed loads??

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 04-23-2006, 05:05 PM
Silver Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 150
300WSM compressed loads??

I would like to use 200gr accubonds in my 300wsm at 2900fps but I don't understand what all the hub-bub is about concerning reduced case capacity? I spoke with the Hogdgon tech on the phone concerning some of their powder and what affect compressing the charge has on the powder performance, he said it has no affect on the powder. I was a little supprised when he said it would have no affect, so why not just compress the charge and not worry about case capacity? [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote

Unread 04-23-2006, 06:23 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,483
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??

I'm not a fan of nor a believer in compressed loads.

Whenever one uses compressed powder charges, they run the risk of breaking powder kernels down to smaller pieces. Those smaller pieces will burn faster than normal kernels and change the pressure curve in a dangerous direction. If I was that Hogdgon tech's boss and learned he in fact said what you said he die, I'd have him on the carpet. There is no consistant standard about how much compressing any powder can take. He may have made Hogdgon liable for any dangerous thing happening.

If there's not enough room in a powder charged case to hold the bullet without compressing (crushing?) powder, four solutions are available.

One is to use a drop tube. One about 6 inches long works well and the added force of the powder going into the case faster will more compactly pack the powder inside the case. Drop tubes are available from virtually all reloading tool suppliers.

Another is to put a loading block of charged cases on a table top, cover their mouths with another identical loading block upside down atop them, then tap the side of the loading block several times gently with a light hammer. This settles the powder deeper in the case.

Or just cut the powder charge until the powder comes right to the base of seated bullets or use another powder whose safe charge weight does this.

And finally, if you have to use the charge weight that compresses the powder, have your chamber's leade/freebore increased so you can do it safely by seating the bullet out further.
Reply With Quote
Unread 04-24-2006, 02:05 PM
Gold Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: East TX
Posts: 773
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??

As far as compressed loads go, be very careful for the reasons Bart mentioned, but also take head of my experience this year. On two occasions, one with .270 Win and H1000 and another time with .338 WM with H4350, I had compressed loads that under recoil of a fired round, the compressed powder bulged the primer out of the pocket a couple thousandths. The primer is now exposed on the sides, and the rounds will not chamber. This could have been, no it WAS a very dangerous situation. I got lucky, but you may not. Just try a slightly faster burning powder until you get 95-100 percent case capacity. Safer and you will be using less powder, i.e. more bang for your buck - literally! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-18-2007, 10:28 AM
Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mouth of Hobble Crk Canyon, Utah
Posts: 630
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??

This morning I was "searching" the word "compressed" and came across this post. Thus my reason for ressurcting a year old post.

The following is a set of reloading options and techniques which, take it or leave it, is outside the normal thinking when it comes to reloading. I was turned onto this idea by “Ackley Improved User”, over on accuratereloading.com. As first, like many, I was skeptical and unbelieving. With an open mind, questions to the right people, research and actual testing, it worked for me. Your mileage may vary. (YMMV)

After more than 30 years of shooting the 30-06 in 22” barrels, I wanted more velocity but without too much hassle or changing calibers. The 30-06 Ackley Improved seems the ticket….for me! Since I was going to start with a new barrel (my Rem 700’s was shot out) and it is impossible to add barrel length, I started with a 26” stainless steel barrel by Dan Lilja of Plains, MT. It has a 1:11 twist, which Dan assures me, will handle up to 200 grain bullets and has 3-grooves instead of the more traditional 5 or 6 grooves. I had Ian Jensen of American Fork, Utah, chamber, thread, crown and install my barrel into my 1982 Rem 700 long action, which had had a 22” 30-06 Mag-na-ported barrel. By the way, Ian is the gunsmith for Barnes Bullets! With that old 22” barrel, the fastest 180 grain load I ever put together was 2750 fps. It had worked for years on numerous elk, deer and antelope, but I wanted MORE!

The concept is to use more powder in the case. Gee, what’s so new about that? But, there is a “’nuff room” issue; as in their isn’t enough of it. Well, the Ackley improvement adds a bit. My 30-06 Winchester cases add 4 grains of water after they had been fire formed to the Ackley. So, theirs a bit more powder! But then, many people have done the 30-06 Ackley improvement and not hit 3100 fps with 180 grain bullets in 26” barrels; have they?

The trick is slow powder, or should I say a powder which is slower than those traditionally used powders. Traditional powders like H414, W760 and WXR, the N*50/*60 series, the 4350’s, Reloader 19 and 22, Ramshot Hunter, AA 3100, Norma MRP and the 4831 series. Don’t get me wrong, some of these powders are very good. Nosler notes how in the standard 30-06, 61 grains of Reloader 22 pushes a 180 grain bullet to 2872 fps and 62 grains of Reloader 22 pushes the same 180 grain bullet to 2985 fps in the Ackley Improved version; both in a 24” Lilja barrel with 1:10 twist. Makes me wonder if Lilja barrels are fast.

The powders I’m talking about are Reloader 25, Magnum, IMR 7828/ssc, H1000, N165, N170. Tradionally, these are magnum powders. Hey, if we’re talking about pushing a 180 bullet at 3000-3100 fps, we are talking magnum territory; albeit, the lower end of magnum territory.

I’m going to talk about Reloader 25 as this is “the” powder for my ’06 Ackley. There is no loading data available for the 30-06 Ackley with Reloader 25, at least none that I know of. AIU gave me a bunch of his data. I believe he derived it from Quick Load, and then tested it himself. From there, I tested some!

If you look in most reloading manuals, the traditionally slow powders are usually compressed loads. There are differing opinions on whether or not compression is good or bad. I’m not going into that here. The reloading manuals compress “a little” compared to what I’m going to talk about.

I’m talking about putting up to 70-71 grains of Reloader 25 into a 30-06 Ackley case; right up to the top of the neck. Again, I really balked at this in the beginning. I’d read an article by Rick Jamison in an early 2005 issue of Shooting Times. In it he brings to light, the then new, IMR 7828ssc. He says that if one wants to increase velocity, one needs to increase the powder charge weight. To do that the neat new thing about the super short cut version of IMR 7828 is that you get more into a case. He was able to get about 4 more grains of it into a 22-250 case. When used with heavy bullets the velocities can climb.
“Ok” thought I! More powder gets more speed but what about all that compression and will it hurt something?

I called Hodgdon and talked to a tech, probably the same tech. Without mentioning any cartridge specifics I asked some questions. I did this because I didn’t want any standard answers coming my way without him actually thinking about the question. I asked about the best way to increase velocity. “Increase the powder charge” was his response. I asked if the new shorter cut propellants allowed this. “Yes” he said. I then went on to ask about compressing powders and any inherent problems associated with it. He said the only problems he could think of, besides the naturally increased pressure issue surrounding powders which are quicker burning combined with the inherent danger of putting to much quick burning powder into a case, was the damage induced to the powder grain due to drastic compression. I asked what he meant by drastic compression. He said that when a person takes something akin to a wooden dowel and begins to bang and crush the powder to get it to compress, they can damage some grains, which can subsequently change the burn dynamics and alter the interior ballistics. I gave an example where I would slowly fill a case ˝ way up the neck or all the way to the top of the neck, via slowly trickling through a long drop tube and use “normal” bullet seating, would that “damage” the grain structure. He thought for a moment and said “no, it should be fine”.

The one problem I have encountered thus far while compressing the powder is accurate bullet seating to a specified OAL difficult. Added/decreased pressure from the seating stem/cup is needed and varies as powder is increased or decreased.

I have run 300 yd groups running in the 1”-5” range and sub MOA groups at 100 yds.

Just yesterday, I was running a seating depth test with 68.6 gr of Reloader 25, Nosler 180 BT, Winchester cases and Fed 210M primers. The powder, with my best technique of slowly dribbling in the powder via an 8" Forster funnel/drop tube came about 3/4's the way up the case neck.
I settled on the last one.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-18-2007, 11:48 AM
Silver Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 301
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??

I was wondering why on Hodgdons newest website they really backed down the loads on Retumbo and the 300 win mag. Maybe you guys answered the question. They had showed in previous publications that 84 grains of REtumbo under a 200 grain was a max load. Their latest data says that 84.0 is max under a partition but only 78 is max under an accubond.
I've loaded up to 83.0 under an accubond before seeing this info without a problem. With that much compression you really get more of a "squeaking sound" rather than crunching. Possibly the shorter kernals don't break so easy. Anyhow I find the differences between charges kind of interesting. I know the AB is longer but....e-gads....that partition has still got to be compressing the heck out of things.
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2007, 03:03 PM
Bronze Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 70
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??

I have the same set up as you. I have a 30-06AI w/ a 26" 1-10 twist barrel. I have run several combinations through mine and I can't seem to find the right load. I've settled on 62.0grs. of RL-22 for an average velocity of 2914 fps. for a 190gr. SMK. I am very interested in any information you might offer and look forward to anymore tests you might experience. I don't want to give up on my ol' 06', it's the first "custom" of my battery and kinda my baby. I'm only south of you so let me know. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
"And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that priciple of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to ALL mankind..." -D&C 98:5-
Reply With Quote
Unread 02-19-2007, 04:46 PM
Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Mouth of Hobble Crk Canyon, Utah
Posts: 630
Re: 300WSM compressed loads??


Check out this link
and this one too

Send me a PM and we can hook up.
Reply With Quote


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads for: 300WSM compressed loads??
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Compressed Loads MSLRHunter Reloading 6 03-28-2010 06:46 AM
300WSM loads tx hunter Reloading 2 10-10-2009 05:53 PM
Vibrating cases for compressed loads tlk Reloading 5 09-07-2009 08:41 AM
shooting compressed loads ? locotrician Reloading 2 02-28-2009 09:41 PM
Compressed loads & OAL winmagman Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 3 09-05-2003 04:55 PM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:33 AM.

All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC