Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

243

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 05-03-2008, 07:18 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 421
4831SC and H4350 worked best in my rifle.
__________________
Lucas

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2008, 08:39 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boise
Posts: 466
Well i will give them a shot.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2008, 08:48 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North Idaho
Posts: 12
I too am trying to get a good longrange 243 load. The rifle is a Rem. VLS with a PSS stock, and probably very similar to yours. As for the 105 gr A-MAX, I have found that 31 gr. Varget worked OK. It was on the lower end of the velocity though. 36.7 gr IMR 4350 was a very decent load. I tested some H4350 and found that 36 gr shot quite well also. I like the H4350 for the fact that it meters far better than the IMR, through your powder measure. I recently bought some 95 gr Berger VLD's and some 95 gr Sierra MatchKings. They look like awesome bullets. I wanted to try the 95 gr. because I have a sneeking suspicion that the 105 is too heavy for our factory barrels. Both bullets have good BC, with the berger coming in at a whopping .514. Sierra is down in the .480 range. The bullets are hard to find in the local sports shop, but midway sells them. I talked to both companys about loads, and each were very helpful. The Sierra with H4350 starts at 35 gr and maxxes out at 41.7 gr. The Berger starts at 36.5 gr and ends at 42.4 gr. Those are some wide ranges, but I loaded some up last night and am going out to try them today. I'll keep you posted as to how they perform.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-03-2008, 08:56 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Central Missouri
Posts: 291
my 243 likes the 107 smk over the load data for imr4064. It shoots a five shot group into the .2s. I have not messed with the 105 amax's enough yet to find a good load for it. Lapua brass was used and you can really tell the difference. Oldfamily.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:38 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 58
H1000

Below is data compiled over 10 years with the 243 and H1000 powder & Federal GM 210 primers, brass was Win. and Lapua. I don't see where H1000 powder is too slow, and will extend barrel life to over 4000 rnds. with the correct cleaning regime, all bullets are naked.

107 Sierra

Short Range: 46.5 H1000, 2875 to 2900 fps, depending on the barrel. Less than 1/2 MOA accuracy.

Long Range: 48.0 H1000, 3000 fps +/-, depending on the barrel. Less than 1/2 MOA accuracy

115 DTAC (Last 2 years)All loads are 1/2 MOA accuracy or better.

47.0 H1000 2935 fps
47.5 H1000 2975 fps
47.5 N170 2960 fps
44.5 N165 2960 fps (most accurate)

Jim Berry
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-03-2008, 09:41 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boise
Posts: 466
Good so H1000 does work.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-05-2008, 09:43 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Boise
Posts: 466
Which Primers

So which primers should I give a try. I saw the 210M, what about like BR4?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 29.52%
49 Votes
NO - 55.42%
92 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.06%
25 Votes
Total Votes: 166
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC