Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Reloading

Reloading Techniques For Reloading


Reply

200gr Accubond, Retumbo, and 300 Win Mag

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-24-2010, 05:50 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 112
200gr Accubond, Retumbo, and 300 Win Mag

I didn't find much realworld data for 200gr bullets and Retumbo so I figured this might help someone whose also looking into these components for the 300 Win Mag. I'm not really looking for advice, but just want to share what I found with my rifle. I've posted this at a couple of the forums I frequent.

Note that the Tikka has a decent amount of freebore when loaded to SAAMI COAL.

Tikka T3, 300 Win Mag, 24" barrel
-200gr Accubond
-new Rem cases (plain not nickel)
-CCI LR magnum primers
-3.35" COAL (fits mag)
-0.002" neck tension
-Retumbo
-Chrony Alpha

76gr ---> 2580fps (73gr is Hodgdon starting load)

78gr ---> 2658fps (this is Hodgdon MAX LOAD)

80gr ---> 2800 fps (EXCEEDS Hodgdon MAX LOAD by 2gr)

Note that Hodgdon lists the start load at 73gr (2703 fps) and max load at 78gr (2872 fps). I think they recently revised the velocity figures because I recall the 78gr load giving close to 3000 fps on their website just a week or two ago.

I started at 73gr and worked slowly to 80gr. I didn't include all the data to save time typing. Bolt lift and extraction were easy with all loads.

At 79-80gr, the primers just barely show signs of cratering. Factory 180gr Core-lokts show more cratering than the 80gr load above. No signs of primer flattening.

Recoil is very mild with the above Retumbo loads. Factory Core-lokts seem to have much more recoil, and higher recoil velocity. These Retumbo loads feel more like a 30-06 than a 300 magnumb.

Case necks 'seemed' more smoked with less than 79gr. At 79gr and above, the necks appear cleaner but still have some residue.

Note that above 78gr, the load is highly compressed(crunch). I used a funnel and weighed each charge. I did not use an extended drop tube.

I don't recommend that anyone try these loads without working up slowly. 80gr is a lot of powder at 3.35" COAL, but the rifle has a quite a bit of freebore. Velocity is reasonable, but I have no idea what the pressure is.

Some may wonder if my rifle shoots slow. I have shot the factory 180gr Core-lokts at 2965fps. Remington advertises these at 2960fps so I think this particular rifle is within the normal range. And my chronograph appears to be functioning fine.

Jason

Last edited by 4th_point; 07-24-2010 at 05:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: 200gr Accubond, Retumbo, and 300 Win Mag
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
200gr. Accubond .300 Win Mag Magnum61 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 7 12-10-2012 12:24 PM
300 rum-200gr accubond-retumbo powder williamsc31 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 9 06-23-2011 07:26 AM
200gr. Accubond vs. 200gr. Sierra Game King: 300 Win Mag Magnum61 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 6 01-22-2010 01:10 AM
30 cal 200gr. Accubond ZSteinle Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 12 11-24-2008 03:49 PM
Retumbo with .338 200gr Ballistic Tip kfrye Reloading 2 06-20-2008 10:34 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.12%
62 Votes
NO - 52.33%
101 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.54%
30 Votes
Total Votes: 193
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC