Why do you choose the tikka over the remington? And how did you know that I was also considering the t3? I really liked the 700 but from the articles I've read at this site remington is loosing there reputation for quality guns. The tikka doesn't offer much for customizing down the road and that is one turn off. But from what I'm reading, it doesn't need much customizing. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
You could just get a Sako, and have the best "out of the box" hunting rifle,(in it's class) in the world. [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img] FWIW..sakofan....
__________________
It's only rock and roll....But I like it!
Targetbuster ,
I've had Sako and Remington .
If you want a rifle that might shoot well out of the box and will shoot well once you blueprint and rebarrel go Remington . Why bother buying new though ? Would be better to pick up a good action and start from scratch .
If you want a rifle that had the quality control done at the factory then go with the Tikka . [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
I think I've made up my mind between the two. I'm about 95% sure about the Tikka T3 Varmint Stainless. Instead of 308 I'm going to try to find one in 7mm-08. If I can't get one ordered in that caliber then I will go back with the 308. One question about the Tikka though, is the action beded into the stock? I can't find anywhere stating that it is. Information would be greatly appreciated. If it is then I will be sold on the tikka. I've never owned a sako made gun but I have shot a few. I think I will give one a try.
Sakofan ,
Sorry if I was being a bit cryptic .
What I was hinting at was that I've had a bad experience with a Remington VSSF and that I wasn't impressed with having to do Remington's quality control for them eg. rebarrel , blueprint action and repair the (as issued) hairline cracks in the HS stock . I bought the rifle with 60 shots through it so couldn't claim warranty .
At the end of the day I doubt that Remington would have considered it's 1.25 MOA accuracy as being bad enough to justify a rebarrel under warranty anyway .
My experience with Sakos is that they do their quality control checks before the rifle leaves the factory rather than relying on their customers to do it .
Some of the sad Q.C. stories you read on the net from Winchester and Remington owners leave me cold (and I've got one of each). [img]images/icons/frown.gif[/img]
I'm new here and will probably be chastized for posting this but do you really consider the 308 as a varmit cartridge?
I have used everything from .17 cal [not rimfire] thru .375 on varmits.They will all kill but once you start using large caliber light weight bullets the velocity goes away pretty quick as does the effective range.
I'm one of those old guys with old technology but the old gun [25+years] will do anything that what is availiable today will do.Weighs 11 1/2 pounds but I can still carry it.
It started life as a custom 243 Win built on a 1909 Argentine 98 Mauser action,Canjar set trigger,28" Hart 1 1/8" stainles barrel and 12 Leupold with 1/8 min dot.20 yrs ago it was rebored and rechambered to 257 Wby.It will shoot "any" 25 cal bullet from 87gr Hornady spire point thru 120gr Nosler solid base boat tail 1/2 MOA or better.This rifle and my Ruger 77V in 220 Swift,and Sako L46 in 17/222 are my defination of a varmit rifle.Maybe not yours.To each his own.
Linear Mode
