Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > The Basics, Starting Out


Reply

Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-27-2009, 08:05 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West Tennessee
Posts: 52
Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

OK, another newbie question.
I've searched the archive but can't find this topic directly discussed:

What are the advantages of laminate wood vs composite?

I like the ability to sand and reshape the laminate wood to my desired contours.
On the other hand the composite's metal receiver mounting frame seems desireable.
Anybody have experiences with both and a strong opinion one way or the other?
thanks.
my first project rifle continues.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-27-2009, 10:12 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,156
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

I have one of each....

Laminate:
My 308 1k Rifle - The Evolution Continues!

Composite (with integral aluminum bedding block)
My 280 - Updated!

In terms of performance, as long as you seal the laminate stock well and pillar bed it, I find no difference in performance/durability.

The advantage of the laminates is customization. A custom stock builder can pretty much make anything you want. Whereas the composite manufacturers, do not seem to be able to mix and match (customize) as much. For instance, McMillan makes great composite stocks - I really like the A4 forearm and the A3 butt. But they can't make it.
__________________
I'm not gonna shoot here. I'm gonna shoot waaaaaaaay over there!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-27-2009, 10:28 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 324
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

Provided we exclude the injection molded (tupperware) stocks, the synthetic stocks are the most stable - errr in theory.
The modern wooden laminate stocks are vacuum impregnated and pressed together under very high pressure. It terms of stability, in theory they are less stable that synthetic stocks.
Does this theoretical loss in stability amount to a hill of beans? No.
I free float my barrels and pillar bed my wooden stocks. The only one to have changed/moved on me is my Model 700 BDL walnut stock. I moved with humidity changes, so I had to re-float the barrel channel, my laminated stocks have not moved.
Synthetic stocks tend to be cold and clammy in cold weather, in that same weather the wooden laminate stocks have a preception of warmth.
Regarding the injection molded plastic stocks, the forearms are not as strong as the synthetic and laminate stocks.
__________________
Don

Snohomish Co. Washington
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-27-2009, 11:03 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 4,102
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chopaka81 View Post
It terms of stability, in theory they are less stable that synthetic stocks.
What theory is that or is that just a WAG?

Many have argued that they are more forgiving harmonically.

Both are very good IF set up correctly.

BH
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-27-2009, 11:22 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 324
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

Oh I don't know - it is one of those spliting hairs things. Theoretically the thermal coefficients of the synthetic stocks as a result of exposure to to temperature changes and humidity are less. Myself I like the laminate stocks better, your point is valid.
__________________
Don

Snohomish Co. Washington
NRA Life Member
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-02-2010, 10:09 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 104
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

Vibration control is key to consistency. Wood helps dampen vibration better than plastic. Stiffness reduces flex which reduces vibration. Aluminum bedding blocks are stiffer than pillars in wood/frp stocks. The Tube stocks made out of aluminum are stiffer than either hence the supposed accuracy advantage.
Hope that helps
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-02-2010, 10:29 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,107
Re: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite

I own both but prefer the composites. However, many factory composites are too weak to lend themselves to accuracy or improvement. I've got mostly McMillan's with a few HS Precisions and a Sheehan which are all excellent.

If a wood laminate stock is set up properly, sealed adequately against moisture, I can't see how they wouldn't work just as well for long range hunting. But ... that's just my opinion.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Stocks: Laminate wood vs composite
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Laminate wood MBR stocks dj300ack Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 1 03-31-2011 12:26 PM
Accuracy: Wood vs Synthetic vs Laminate iSnipe Long Range Hunting & Shooting 13 10-18-2010 06:57 PM
WTB: ANY old wood or laminate stock Forester Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 1 11-30-2008 11:54 AM
Lightening up a wood laminate stock... jmden General Discussion 4 11-11-2006 03:59 PM
composite stocks col48 Equipment Discussions 14 06-07-2006 03:40 PM

Current Poll
Do you wear hearing protection while hunting?

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC