[ QUOTE ]
my tests are not scientific
[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. Excellent report. You have met the basic requirements for a valid test using the scientific method. You have an experiment design with objective measurements, published your data (which hopefully is repeatable)
I also do temperature experiments/measurements. Right now my favorite tool to measure temp is a Fluke FoodPro IR thermo.
[ QUOTE ]
dunked the lug in until the water was again at 185.
[/ QUOTE ]
The problem with using water to achieve thermal equilibrium - evaporation has a significant impact on temp (drop). A far better approach is to bake the object in the oven.
[ QUOTE ]
180 degrees …. lug grew .0008 … 150 degrees for some comparison and found the lug grew .0003.
[/ QUOTE ]
What's missing now is the length of the lug . The coefficient of linear expansion is well know. With the length of the lug we can see how well your measurements fit with established theory.
[ QUOTE ]
I took a Remington 30-06 barrel and action out of the stock and measured the lug at 70F. I then heated up the barrel to approximately 180 degrees with a propane torch. I moved the torch around until I got the action about as warm as it is when I am shooting (130-140F) and measured the lug. I was hard pressed to find any measurable growth.
[/ QUOTE ]
This is the best info and a great test. You (or me or someone else) should now repeat this, but in lieu of a propane torch, torch off a few rounds (you don't even need to be shooting pd's [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] ) What's also missing is the temp of the lug after heating the pipe/action - and how you measured temp.
I think the best way to measure barrel temp is with
Thermocouples and an A/D converter.
A+ work! Good report.