Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > The Basics, Starting Out


Reply

Drag functions and drop charts

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-14-2006, 03:17 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 179
Drag functions and drop charts

Would someone mind expalining the different drag functions to me? Should I be using G1 for a long range chart?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-15-2006, 03:53 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,082
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

Since nobody bothered to answer you, I will take a shot.

G1 is not sexy, but most bullets are listed this way and it makes your calculations look good [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Sierra found that they do work well and while not perfect, for the average person this is probably the preferred model.

edge.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-16-2006, 03:08 PM
Writers Guild
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,459
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

The Drag or G function describes the type of bullet you use. I tried to find the definitions but my link no longer works. Flat base, Boat tail, Secant ogive, VLD are just a few of the broad categories that bullets fall into.

Each one is represented by a G function.

The BC is simply a number which illustrates the value for that G function. Can only be used to compare relative drag between bullets of the same G family.

Example a G5 bullet with 0.700BC will have less drag then a G5 bullet with a 0.500BC.

Without knowing what G function was used to generate the BC, it really is meaningless.

That is why some bullets fly substantially flatter despite having the same BC. The two bullets differ in G function which really defines how that bullet decelerates in flight.

Example a G1 bullet with a BC of 0.500 will not fly anywhere as flat as a G7 bullet with the same BC of 0.500.

The link will bring you to a site which has a ton of info on ballistics. Also, let's you generate drop charts and play with your data.

Unfortunately, there are no rules throughout the bullet industry to standardise the BC values. Some inflate their printed values to make their bullets look good. Others under estimate because the bullet follows a better drag function.

Some like Sierra give their BC's through shooting the bullets. Others just use the number that squirts out from a bullet form program.

Most BTHP match bullets follow a G5 function. Some poly tipped BT match bullets and VLD bullets follow the G7 drag function.

Also, bullets can change their relative G function and BC depending on the distortion incurred while travelling down the bore or at the velocities launched.

Confusing...You bet.

What I do is use a ballistics program to generate a drop chart. Use whatever printed data is given. This will get me close. I then make up a 'true' drop chart based on real world shooting on several days.

Jerry

http://www.eskimo.com/~jbm/calculati...culations.html
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-16-2006, 04:48 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,082
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

With all due respect, G1 was found to be the most consistent function with almost every standard bullet from flat base to Boat Tail. That is why Sierra adopted G1 for their bullets.

Clearly nothing beats shooting bullets from your rifle and in your conditions, but IMO, G1 is what almost every bullet manufacturer uses and unless you have independent data I say stick with G1.

edge.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-16-2006, 04:51 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,082
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

From the Sierra website.


http://www.exteriorballistics.com/eb...ned/4th/44.cfm

2) G 1 is the Most Appropriate Drag Function Choice for Sierra’s Bullets

The tests conducted in 1971 also compared four standard drag functions to determine which of these models was best for Sierra’s boat tail bullets. The four drag functions were published by Winchester-Western:

G 1 - for all bullets except those in the categories below
G 5 - for low base drag bullets (i.e., boat tail bullets)
G 6 - for flat base, sharp pointed, full patch bullets
G L - for hollow point, lead nose bullets

Theory says that if the drag model matches the true bullet drag, the ballistic coefficient will be constant at all velocities. If the drag model does not match the true drag, then we will find different values of ballistic coefficient in measurements at different muzzle velocities.

Several bullets were used in the tests, both flat base and boat tail types. For each bullet type, several test rounds (typically 5 to 10) were fired at each of two muzzle velocities (typically 3000 and 2500 fps). For each test round four ballistic coefficients were determined ( C 1 , C 5 , C 6 , and C L ). This procedure gave two sets of four ballistic coefficient values for each bullet type, one set for the higher muzzle velocity and one for the lower. By comparing the values in the two sets, it was easy to see which of the four C’s changed significantly (outside the measurement error band) and which did not. From theory we expected that the best drag model ( G 1 , G 5 , G 6 , or G L ) for each bullet type to be the one for which the corresponding ballistic coefficient ( C 1 , C 5 , C 6 , or C L ) changed the least amount between the two muzzle velocity levels.

Although we expected G 5 to be best for the boat tail bullets, the tests showed that G 1 was better. This was a surprise. The second surprise was that, while G 1 was best for flat base bullets, C 1 was not constant; it varied significantly with muzzle velocity.

With these observations, G 1 was adopted as the standard drag model for all Sierra bullets. Values of ballistic coefficients in all Sierra Manuals are referenced to the G 1 drag function.

Finding that G 1 was best for boat tail bullets was fortunate, because G 1 has been and continues to be used by all commercial manufacturers of bullets. Consequently, ballistic comparison can be made between bullets made by different manufacturers, as well as between bullets made by a single manufacturer. If different drag models were necessary for different bullets or different bullet styles, comparisons based on ballistic coefficients would not be possible. Another advantage of G 1 is that it is the drag function for the Ingalls Tables, so that ballistic trajectories can be calculated using those tables.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-21-2006, 10:38 AM
Writers Guild
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,459
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

I have little doubt that Sierra uses the G1 function in their BC calcs and that the tests done back then was a fair representation of the bullets manf at that time.

However, times have changed and so have bullet profiles.

We now have bullets of same weight with a huge variety of shapes and lengths. We now have both secant and tangent ogives. Bullets made with a variety of shapes usually lumped as VLD bullets.

We have poly tips, grooved bullets, small HP, wide HP, trimmed HP and on it goes.

So G1 does not represent all bullets manf today. All one needs to do is shoot conventional HP bullets like Sierra Matchking next to HP like the Lapua Scenar or poly tips like the Amax, SST, interbond, ballistic tip/accubond.

Although the BC suggests their ballistics to be similar, drop at distance indicates otherwise.

When I did my own tests a few years ago, I compared Nosler J4 (identical to Sierra MK), Nosler BT and Hornady Amax of equal weight. All launched at the same velocity as it was measured during firing. All had basically the same 100yd zero.

At 700yds, the HP bullets dropped consistently more then the poly tipped bullets. Impact groups/accuracy was similar between bullets. The drop extended as distance increased to 2 to 3MOA more scope elevation needed for the HP bullets at 900yds.

Recent tests with SST and Interbonds show that these can fly even flatter. Bullet lengths have increased for the given weight. This indicates an increase in streamlined shape. However, printed BC is pretty close to the same.

While playing with Amax in a few rifles at distances out to 940yds, the drop charts used would not agree with real world impacts. The real world drops were substantially less.

By playing with the program, nothing worked. Wasn't until I started plugging in different G functions that things started to agree.

So, G1 may work for some bullets very well, they don't work for all bullets today. By the way, the amax was a 162gr 7mm and the data agreed with my shooting when I used a G7 drag function with the printed BC of 0.625.

Now compare that to the G1 value....

Jerry
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-21-2006, 05:46 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,082
Re: Drag functions and drop charts

I agree to disagree [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

IMO, and according to what I have read, the B.C. changes as velocity decays so to assume that a single B.C. works from the muzzle to 1k is wrong.

IMO, a B.C. will get you "on the paper", but most likely you are better served by shooting the bullets over several ranges and making a drop chart. How stable the bullet is as it exits your rifle can have a dramatic effect on drop at long range. Bullet quality at long range may influence POI more than most other factors.

I enjoy the discussion.

edge.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Drag functions and drop charts
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
.223 Bullet drop charts rpainter Long Range Hunting & Shooting 1 03-06-2011 12:46 PM
Drop Charts- Please can you help me ??? robbobsam Long Range Hunting & Shooting 8 08-10-2010 03:46 AM
Arm pouches for drop charts tracker12ga Long Range Hunting & Shooting 2 09-03-2009 07:34 AM
What do your drop charts look like? AJ Peacock Long Range Hunting & Shooting 10 04-18-2009 01:50 AM
Drag Functions blygy Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 1 12-29-2006 08:46 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC