Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Hunting > The Basics, Starting Out


Reply

.243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-17-2011, 11:10 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 25
.243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

So I want to get my hands dirty with shooting and reloading. I would like to start off with a low recoiling caliber and then move up to the big boy calibers as I get more experienced.

Which caliber would you believe to have more room for showing a newcomer the discipline of shooting long range? I know .224 and .243 won't be good at 800 yards, but they can at least teach me the basics [reloading, ballistics, shooting skills, shooting position, shooting everything] before I get to the real long range.

Which of the two calibers would offer wider range of load capabilities? Which of the calibers can shoot further out and still be stable?

If you believe there's a better option out there feel free to let me know..... how bad is the recoil on 6BR Norma ??

THANK YOU

Last edited by ajacinto; 08-17-2011 at 11:30 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-18-2011, 10:20 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North of Eden-South of Heaven, Wy.
Posts: 1,108
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

My vote would be for the 243 to start with.
__________________
Every man needs a good woman, good dog, good horse and a good gun.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-19-2011, 09:11 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,608
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

6br norma is an excellent target/varmint cartridge
it has less recoil than 243
it is easy to load for
with a 1:8 twist barrel, you can shoot 105-107gr bullets accurately to 1000yds
the barrel will last for thousands of rounds

the main drawback is that you won't find ammo at walmart or cabelas
you can order excellent Lapua ammo online
since you intend to handload, factory ammo availability shouldn't be an issue

you don't have too many factory rifle choices in 6br norma
however, savage chambers a couple of affordable/accurate rifles in 6br norma

22-250 and 243 are good cartridges with their own pros and cons
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-19-2011, 09:49 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,903
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

Quote:
Originally Posted by ajacinto View Post
So I want to get my hands dirty with shooting and reloading. I would like to start off with a low recoiling caliber and then move up to the big boy calibers as I get more experienced.

Which caliber would you believe to have more room for showing a newcomer the discipline of shooting long range? I know .224 and .243 won't be good at 800 yards, but they can at least teach me the basics [reloading, ballistics, shooting skills, shooting position, shooting everything] before I get to the real long range.

Which of the two calibers would offer wider range of load capabilities? Which of the calibers can shoot further out and still be stable?

If you believe there's a better option out there feel free to let me know..... how bad is the recoil on 6BR Norma ??

THANK YOU

I have both. And I use the 22-250 more because of where I am. If I lived in the western...more open states....I might lean toward the 243. Other than flat out EXPLODE prairie dogs and make a LOT of noise, there basically is no recoil from it. .243 has a tiny bit of muzzle jump and almost the same amount of noise. Lots depends on what your end goal is. If you want to hunt antelope; Yotes; badgers...etc...Id go with the 243. If its PD's and Yotes...Id lean toward the 22-250.

You can lean well with either.

BTW: With the right components the 243 cartridge ( basically a 6MM) can fly a LONG distance. My 243 heavy barrel gun isnt being setup for short ranges at all...

Last edited by Sully2; 08-19-2011 at 09:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-19-2011, 02:37 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: az
Posts: 2,282
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

the gun is more important than the caliber. an 8 twist , 6mmbr savage lrpv or f class will shoot real good very far. an lrpv 22-250 9 twist the same.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2011, 08:30 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 25
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

THANK YOU! very much for the input gentlemen!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2011, 08:43 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Falls Church, VA
Posts: 3,263
Re: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington

Given the choice between 243 and 22-250...definitely 243. Get a rifle with sufficient twist to shoot the heavier bullets (105+ grains) and you will have a rig that can shoot targets and varmints as far as you can see. It will also kill deer at considerable distance.
__________________
I'm not gonna shoot here. I'm gonna shoot waaaaaaaay over there!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: .243 Winchester vs .22-250 Remington
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Winchester 270 vs Remington 7mm-08 400bull Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 9 06-07-2011 11:43 PM
Remington 5R milspec in .308 winchester pondskipper Guns For Sale 5 09-20-2010 04:46 PM
FS-winchester, Remington, Savage CamW Guns For Sale 1 04-09-2010 12:42 AM
Remington 700 300 Winchester Mag George LS Guns For Sale 0 02-10-2008 08:47 AM
Remington 700 Action (270 Winchester)? samson Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 5 12-08-2006 06:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC