Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Equipment Discussions


Reply

Sierra's 7 RUM load suggestions

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-21-2003, 08:12 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Eastern US
Posts: 61
Sierra\'s 7 RUM load suggestions

Hello LR brethren,

Just thought I'd pass on some info that may be of interest to the LR shooters using the 7mm Remington Ultra Mag.

E-mailed Sierra's Rich Machholz and asked for load suggestions with the 168 Match King.

He suggested the following for the 168 MK.

Hodgdons 1000 up to 88.0 grains
Hodgdons 50 BMG up to 98.0 grains
Reloader 22 up to 80.0 grains
Reloader 25 up to 82.0 grains

He suggested starting them 3 grains short and work your way up.

He also suggested 175 SBT's because of their "higher" ballistic coefficient which I couldn't find data on instead of the MK.

I'm sticking with the MK because I already have them and have had good initial accuracy with them.

Just wanted to pass this along.

Good shooting!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-21-2003, 08:53 AM
dwm dwm is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 616
Re: Sierra\'s 7 RUM load suggestions

So if all of these powders will work, isn't the best choice the slowest burning one?

1. Much lower pressures from slower burning powder, easier on all components
2. Longer barrel life because it doesn't get as hot all in one place.
3. Small errors in charge weight are less significant to the overal charge weight
4. Slower burning powder is better for heavy for the caliber bullets
5. Slower burning powder makes better use of the really long barrels

I do have a question though, is powder temperature stability related to charge weight?

Or

Is a large charge weight more or less sensitive to variations in temperature?

Doug

All this doesn't really matter if it won't consistently produce tiny little groups though, huh?
__________________
doug
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-21-2003, 04:42 PM
dwm dwm is offline
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 616
Re: Sierra\'s 7 RUM load suggestions

I guess my last question was more about temperature sensitivity being chemically based as opposed to based on mass like metal.

If it is a chemical reaction that changes with rizing amounts of powder, then more powder could indeed make it worse.

Just a thought,

Doug
__________________
doug
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-21-2003, 11:29 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Eastern US
Posts: 61
Re: Sierra\'s 7 RUM load suggestions

Doug,

Don't wanna get too technical here because I don't think it is overly useful out in the field. But, large masses are less affected by changes in temperature than smaller masses. In other words, it is possible that a heavy (high mass) load could be less affected by temperature than another. I think it was Nosler that recommended that the best groups typically occur somewhere around 80% case capacity. That volume is what probably affects burn rate more than the mass(weight) of the load.

Bottom line, as you pointed out, what difference does it make when you find a load that shoots itty bitty holes in the paper. Other things come into play like air-powder volume ratio, primer type, etc. etc. but I try to focus on the steak instead of the peas!

By practicing a lot (different days, different temperatures, different ranges, elevations, positions, ad finitum) I usually iron out any concerns.

Good luck!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Sierra's 7 RUM load suggestions
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
264 Win Mag load suggestions gearfoot Reloading 13 09-13-2014 01:30 PM
Load suggestions for 300. WSM matt_3479 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 2 05-03-2010 12:12 PM
Load suggestions for 300 WSM Rickyrebar Reloading 9 04-18-2010 12:53 PM
load suggestions for 30-378 ru1234 Reloading 4 11-30-2006 01:55 PM
Load suggestions spiritwolf68 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 03-29-2004 06:14 PM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.41%
60 Votes
NO - 52.88%
101 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 15.71%
30 Votes
Total Votes: 191
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC