|
Re: Finally!! The 260 Rem and the 140 SMK...
I was just curious for my own personal enjoyment. I don't have a 6.5 yet and most comments applaud the 142 and not the 140smk. I know a little of good thing can go a long way and a little too much the wrong way.
I'll go ahead and open a can of worms by saying I am playing with a ballistics calc, published bc (with a grain of salt), and different rounds folks on here and elsewhere are shooting to evaluate their results in comparison to my goals. I am looking to see what lies on my horizon as far the next caliber/cartridge I will dream about owning until I do.
__________________
Stephen
|