  | AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS |
|

09-03-2012, 08:00 AM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 91
|
|
|
AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
Hey guys. I'm wondering what the difference is between the Accuracy International CIP mags and the regular Accuracy International mags? Thanks guys.
|

12-02-2012, 08:54 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 16
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
BTT - I have the same question...
__________________
M1AShooter
|

12-08-2012, 02:53 AM
|
|
Bronze Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 91
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
Deals with length. CP mags you can load to a longer OAL. 3.60" is all your gonna get with stardard mags and that probably won't feed reliably Everytime if loaded that far out in a stardard mag. If your shooting a long action and loading long go with CP mags or do what I did and don't even run AICS. Go with accurate mag 3.774" length mag. But only two manufacturers produce bottom metal for it. Accurate mag has their own which is a little pricey or give Dave Kiff a call out at PT&G, pacific tool and gauge, and let him know what your shooting, how far, and how you intend to load it, long or short. FYI it's a total drop-in too! No in letting required.
|

12-08-2012, 07:55 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 16
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
Thanks for the info! Any issues with the vertical rib interfering with loaded (or loading) rounds? I'm currently researching a 338 EDGE build and that seems to be an issue for that caliber.
__________________
M1AShooter
|

12-08-2012, 07:59 PM
|
|
Silver Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Helena, AR
Posts: 197
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
M1A,
I would be cautious about an edge especially with a 300 Berger loaded to 3.7 or so. I use a Wyatt's extended box and mine are loaded to almost 4.000.
|

12-09-2012, 05:00 PM
|
|
Junior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 16
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
Cautious in what way? Is 3.7" getting too short for the 300gr bullets? I seem to remember 3.785" being somebody's OAL for the EDGE but I can't find that now...
__________________
M1AShooter
|

12-09-2012, 05:14 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dayton, Nevada
Posts: 1,704
|
|
|
Re: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1AShooter
Cautious in what way? Is 3.7" getting too short for the 300gr bullets? I seem to remember 3.785" being somebody's OAL for the EDGE but I can't find that now...
|
That's Carlock's OAL with the SMK. I also used the same OAL with much success.
|
  |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Similar Threads for: AI CIP mags VS. Standard AI MAGS
|
| Thread |
Thread Starter |
Forum |
Replies |
Last Post |
|
Barrel Length -short mags vs long mags
|
njc89 |
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics |
4 |
11-08-2011 10:36 AM |
|
XD 9MM Mags
|
Need Range |
Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. |
0 |
04-19-2010 10:12 PM |
|
FN SPR Mags
|
tactlt |
Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. |
0 |
04-14-2010 10:39 PM |
|
AI Mags
|
Ksmirk |
Gunsmithing |
2 |
10-01-2009 02:05 PM |
|
M14 mags
|
Dowierj |
Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics |
2 |
02-13-2004 04:37 PM |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40 PM.