Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Equipment Discussions


Reply

17 HMR vs 22 mag

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 11-23-2004, 06:37 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ithaca, NY
Posts: 37
Re: 17 HMR vs 22 mag

This is a very interesting thread and it appears a number of people are recommending more or less what I ended up doing: I have a savage 22 mag Stainless Steel fat barrel, a 93, WOW, it's a shooter.... 125 yards and I can stop most anything thin skinned creature... well, anyway, everyone was telling me I have to get a .17

It was like a religion swept the nation... The .17 evangelical born again sermonizers... and I had to listen to many .17 sermons.

So, after much reading and "listening" and investigating I did end up getting something else: a 223.

It has more range, flat shooting, not much bark... or bite... ammo is very cheap...I can get 40 grain up to... geeez... well over 65 grain and that's alot, So for me I was drawn to go to the 223 rather than the .17, and yes I know there are many who would say the .17 can do what the 223 can't and the 22 mag can't.... all I can say is: not much as far as I can see, but I respect you for your discernment and for your preference for a .17 over BOTH a 22 mag and a 223. Amen.
__________________
http://www.icmachines.com
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Are you on Facebook?
Yes - 46.45%
1,093 Vote
No - 19.38%
456 Votes
No, but I may join - 1.74%
41 Votes
No way, are you kidding? - 36.21%
852 Votes
Total Votes: 2,353
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC