LongRangeHunting.com


Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Chatting and General Stuff > General Discussion
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Shop Cabelas Member Map Register Mark Forums Read
General Discussion Must wear red or OD green socks to participate. I can't see your socks, please be honest.


Click to register now Click to register now Click to register now

Reply

They shot him in the ass to "break him down"

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #15  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:06 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pennsyltucky
Posts: 1,709
i agree with jwp. i have no problems taking a shot at the south end heading north. very leathal. not saying it's a shot i take in a long range situation.
Reply With Quote

  #16  
Old 05-15-2008, 09:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 568
jwp475,

I really had not considered your scenario, but it does have merit.

I would tend to avoid the rump due to meat loss, but two years ago I shot a buck quartering to me, and the bullet entered his chest, slightly off center, the bullet exited the opposite ham ( destroying a lot of meat ).

I try for the heart, but this deer caught me by surprise and I shot offhand.
This bullet was a 30 cal. 150 grain SST. If I had had a stouter bullet, I guess that the reverse shot would not have been out of line.

edge.

as an afterthought, I don't think that I would take this shot JUST to slow down an uninjured animal, but if I was confident that I could hit the heart, then I have no problem with it.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-16-2008, 03:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,664
If any of you ever get to Anchorage Alaska, go by the local gun shops and ask for the video "No Land For The Timid" there is a scene shooting a Polar Bear with a 375 H&H and they shot this bear 11 times if I remember correctly with all shots in the shoulder or rib cage just behind the shoulder and this bear would not go down and stay.
A stoutly constructed bullet that is capable of extreme penetration (and if one does not miss judge the angle) is an extremely deadly shot. A bullet that travels the length of the body is very deadly very quickly..

I agree with Dave Wilson this is not a preferred shot at long range..
__________________
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-18-2008, 12:37 AM
SPONSOR
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 544
A few years back I had a nice buck scouted. Opening morning the deer stood up 100 yards out facing dead away. He slowly fed straight away from me for another hundred yards before disapearing into the brush. Funny thing is, it never occured to me to run one through from the tailpipe. Dunno if I'd take the shot if I had it to do over. Messy...

I did put an arrow through a skunk that showed me his rear target dot. Shut him off like you'd flicked a switch.

I've seen two deer shot in the base of the neck from the same angle. Nice, clean, and instant.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-18-2008, 04:08 AM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 385
It's pretty rare that anyone would have to shoot a game animal in the butt. At long ranges I can't think of any reason for taking such a shot unless the animal is wounded and moving away. At closer ranges, I can't see messing up the guts even if it is a killing shot. If the animal isn't going to be eaten then I guess a humanely dead animal is a dead animal.

I've taken the butt shot twice that I recall in 36 years of hunting, both times on moose. On the one, the bull had been shot broadside through the lungs at 615 yds and then turned and headed away from me. Next shot through the hip / ball joint broke him down, with very little meat damage I might add. I was using a .338 215 gr Barnes X boattail bullet, back in 1994 before the Triple Shocks came out. Found the bullet laying against the stomach - luckily it didn't penetrate the stomach pouch. Only penetrated about 18-20 inches which surprised me. First shot was a killer but I couldn't know for sure at the time I fired my second shot.

Second moose was about 420 yards away and had been spooked by another bull and just kept moving away from me. I couldn't get him to turn, as he was already headed out and away at a quick pace. Rather than face the winter without moose meat I fired. Incurred some meat loss on the left ham. First shot wasn't a killer. The moose then turned broadside and I was able to hit him more properly. If you lose 10 pounds of meat on a moose with a shot to the ham, you still end up with 350 lbs of good meat, on an adult bull. Less on a 1 1/2 year old. More on a monster old bull.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-30-2008, 11:37 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: western oregon
Posts: 29
specialized equipment required

Large bears might become cranky and maybe even a little naughty if shot in the backside with the wrong caliber/wrong bullet.It,s a long way to the boiler room from that angle.Large caliber and heavy bullets will do the job,.375,.416 and .458s.Doing this for any other reason than stopping a wounded animal is unethical and foolish,and more foolish than that would be taping it for all the non-hunting world to see.They should have more respect for the game they(hunt)!GRPB
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 05-30-2008, 11:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,664
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by phorwath View Post
If you lose 10 pounds of meat on a moose with a shot to the ham, you still end up with 350 lbs of good meat, on an adult bull. Less on a 1 1/2 year old. More on a monster old bull.


I brought home nearly 600 pounds of boned out meat from this baby


__________________
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot

Last edited by jwp475; 05-30-2008 at 11:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First "shot" at Long-Range-Hunting! jb1000br Long Range Hunting & Shooting 24 12-28-2004 07:08 PM
30" vs. 28" vs. 26" barrells on 30 cal. Wby's mfc1245 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 12 07-22-2004 09:01 AM
22" vs. 24" vs. 27" barrel; velocity differnce on a .260? scottl0000@hotmail.com Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 07-20-2004 01:50 PM
Personal best "piss shot" this weekend.. Jake in NC Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 0 03-06-2004 08:23 PM
Post For D.C....The "LONG" and the "SHORT" Boyd Heaton Long Range Hunting & Shooting 5 04-26-2003 07:42 PM

outside-hub1


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2007 LenBackus.net, LLC
Ad Management by RedTyger