  | Which Muzzleloader is best for the money?? |
|

01-09-2006, 05:18 PM
|
|
SPONSOR
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,135
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
Guys, I just read an article about a new front loader built on a Howa action. I don't remember which rag it was in but it handles 5- 50 grain pellets and has some awsome balistics. It's ignited by a 45 long colt case (I think) with a mag rifle primer in it.
|

01-09-2006, 06:22 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,069
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
Coyboy,
I think that you are describing the BP Express.
http://www.ultimatefirearms.com/index.htm
You can not use smokeless with this rifle! Seems strange with their strength claims!
edge.
|

01-09-2006, 07:19 PM
|
|
Silver Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: El Reno,Ok.
Posts: 210
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
Edge - Right now I'm shooting 58gr of Hodgon Lil'gun, 250gr sst, ballistic bridge, and harvester sabot. I've got some decent groups with just the harvester sabot, but I just about cut the groups in half with the use of a ballistic bridge.
|

01-09-2006, 07:31 PM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,069
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
distantfoe,
Ah, Lil'Gun, one of my old favorites! I have shot at least 12 pounds in my Savage.
I have used sub bases for the last 4 years, but found that 1 out of ten shots would be a flier, which I attribute to the sub base. I moved to slower powders and no longer need the sub base. Just food for thought.
edge.
|

01-09-2006, 07:53 PM
|
|
Silver Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: El Reno,Ok.
Posts: 210
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
edge - that's interesting, I thought I was experiencing an occasional flier when the clean barrel had <10 rounds through it. I am considering other slower powders, Lil'gun seems little touchy. It can be hard to every speck of powder out of those vials and when the gun won't shoot with 57.5 or 58.5 but exactly 58gr, it makes me want to explore the powders that use upwards of 80gr. I did get some good groups with 80+ of H4198, which initially I was worried it would be hard to ignite in colder weather. At any rate, this would give me a chance to play with loads that don't use the sub base. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|

01-09-2006, 09:32 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
I'm building mine on a pardner 12ga shotgun. There shouldn't be any problems. They can also be built on a ruger #1, but I thought that was overkill.
I've never heard anything about the swinglock. That great that another Smokeless is performing well. I heard the NULA's a awesome as well.
Shooting from are clean bore is a problem with ML's. The first shot is off. But like you said, is you leave it fouled you rust the barrel.
|

01-10-2006, 06:59 AM
|
|
Platinum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,069
|
|
|
Re: Which Muzzleloader is best for the money??
[ QUOTE ]
SNIP
Shooting from are clean bore is a problem with ML's. The first shot is off. But like you said, is you leave it fouled you rust the barrel.
[/ QUOTE ]
This brings up some different opinions on technique!
Since this is Longrangehunting.com, IMO, EVERY shot will be from a clean barrel.
Unlike our centerfire friends, if you take a spotting shot you will need to stand to reload. Once you lose the position I see no reason not to swab the bore before reloading. I think that for absolute consistency this is critical.
I am not talking about close-in hunting accuracy to 200 or 250 yards, but at longer ranges perhaps starting at 300.
edge.
|
  |
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
|
|