MILDOT? MLR? OR EMLR

col48 · #8 08-06-2006, 03:03 AM

hi Eaglet
i will send the man that made it(i think he made it)a email,and he can tell you all about it.
thanks
colin

Ballistic64 · #9 08-06-2006, 02:27 PM

Nightforce is coming out with a new NPR1 that may interest a lot of people.Graduated in 1 MOA instead of 2 like the NPR2.There was a post on another forum about it.

http://www.benchrest.com/forums/show...ght=nightforce

älg · #10 08-07-2006, 02:49 AM

Eaglet, I would go with an homogeneous system, meaning moa adjustments-moa retiocle, or mil adjustments-mil reticle. Why mix them??

That said, I am waiting for a scope with the P4 reticle; it is basically a mil reticle, but with plenty of holdover possibilities, apart from other measures you may be able to use if you have a lot of time to take a shot [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

Reticle is offered by Schmidt Bender.Talk to Pete Lincoln if you are interested.

älg · #11 08-07-2006, 02:50 AM

forgot to mention it´s the P4 fine. thinner than std P4.

Eaglet · #12 08-07-2006, 12:18 PM

[ QUOTE ]
I would go with an homogeneous system

[/ QUOTE ]
I completely agree! I guess the reason I made reference Each tic mark would be about 0.86 MOA was just to show that it would be more accurate for ranging and using the tics to shoot off of, but of course what I'm calling EMLR is homogeneous, it's all mildots.