Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Chatting and General Stuff > General Discussion

General Discussion Must wear red or OD green socks to participate. I can't see your socks, please be honest.


Reply

Bubble level for rifle

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #78  
Old 03-08-2004, 02:12 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,369
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Brent

I believe I have an answer to how a cant error can be zero as seen in RSI.

If the program/shooter uses the "near" zero the error can be zero. This is where the projectile crosses the line-of-sight the first time. The "near" zero is most often though of as something much less than 100 yards, typically by hunters and their rifles/sights it's in the 20 to 30 yard range. (There are methods to move this "near" zero to 100 yards but it requires mounting the scope/sights very high on the rifle. Perhaps this is the possible error I saw in RSI when I changed the sight height to 2.6 on on example.)

reference article:
http://home.worldonline.nl/~jhogema/...1/kantel1e.htm


Notice in section 2.1 of the referenced web article the figure B representation. This can be thought of as a "near" zero representation if you discount the projectile path, examine only the Line-Of-Sight line. Cant the rifle 90 degrees to the side and the deflection goes to zero -0-. The "drop" still exists and the round will strike below the POA, BUT it will be DIRECTLY BELOW the POA.

I believe the more correct approach would be better represented by figure C in section 2.1 of the referenced web page. We seldom use the "near" zero (first LOS crossing) in hunting.

Edited for format

[ 03-08-2004: Message edited by: Dave King ]
Reply With Quote
  #79  
Old 03-08-2004, 06:18 AM
*WyoWhisper*
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Although all this physics math is quite confusing for a guy like me I believe thisis an important issue when LRH.

I feel that if Dave and Phil can put heads together they can have this figured out to everyones satisfaction.

Now if only I had the amount of working brain cells they do I could understand some of it [img]images/icons/rolleyes.gif[/img]

My question at this point is this.. ( lets see if I can explain what I am thinking)

in essence your LOS ( through scope )is pointing down in relation to the barrels LOS or your barrels LOS is pointing on an upward angle in relation to your LOS ( though scope ) assuming it is level.

now as you cant the scope to what you may perceive as level ( lets say to the left ) You're still centered on the POA, the dot on the target, but because your barrel is pointing at an upward angle your bullet trajectory is going to be to the left of you POA.... and as distance becomes greater the left POImpact becomes greater...

Does this make sense or am I making an ass of myself

[ 03-08-2004: Message edited by: *WyoWhisper* ]
Reply With Quote
  #80  
Old 03-08-2004, 07:18 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 2,539
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Phil,
I'm going to take my compass and draw the first circle around my POA (bull) that's radius is 1 unit. This is the the bore distance from the scope height like you said above.

As we cant, we rotate around the LOS always being fixed on the bull, and the bore is ALWAYS maintains this distance from the scope, 1 unit away in any cant position.

Likewise, the bore line (BL) always intersects the target 2 units away from our LOS, on the opposite side the bore is offset to. (normal fire - bore offset 1 unit away at 6 o'clock, BL intersects target 2 units away at 12 o'clock, cant the rifle 180 degrees and it reverses)

That said, we draw another circle with our compass, this time 2 units away from our LOS to represent the BL intersection point on our target at any given cant angle.

We KNOW, that the bullet WILL leave the bore and travel the BL angle, no matter what the cant angle. The only thing that causes it to deviate is ONE thing: GRAVITY (wind is discounted here). Picture this shooting downhill 90 deg if that helps.

Now, we look at our target and see the BL circle 2 units away from our LOS.

We absolutely KNOW the bullets POI WILL BE dirrectly below the point where the BL intersects the target with ANY given cant angle. i.e. directly below that point on the circle 2 units away (3 units total in your previous example I believe).

Here's where we run into discrepancies, I think.

There is NOT 3 units of drop from the BL, there is 2 units of drop, and 1 unit of scope height though, but not DROP.

Dave's circle around the LOS accounted for both, sight height and BL drop.

Sight height is 1 unit, in our example, so in the 90 degree canted position, if this 1 unit was all that was dialed into the scope, the bullet would fall directly below our LOS, as the BL and LOS coinside perfectly.

Also, if nothing was dialed in at all, the bullet's POI would be 1 unit "away" from our LOS for a 90 degree canted position, and drop would be "2" units below "that".

Now, we KNOW that we have 2 more MOA dialed into the scope, not just the 1 MOA for scope height compensation (yeah, I'm calling it MOA here, I'm tired of units and my brain thinks in MOA damnit [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img] [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]) So, we now have, as a result of this additional 2 MOA, 2 MOA worth of deflection from cant at a 90 degree angle, also with the 2 MOA drop that gravity dictates. (there's that nicely formed 2 MOA box you taught me about at 90 degrees to verify your zero point, remember Dave [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]) Drop is equal to horizontal deflection at 100 yards when fired at 90 degrees, forming a group at a low corner of an imaginary box diaganal of your POA.

That all said....... The circle 2 MOA around your LOS, which represents your BL in a given canted position, drop is ALWAYS 2 MOA PLUMB below that point in which the BL is intersecting the target (in our example at 100 yards).

Therefore, centering our compass at the point 2 MOA PLUMB below our LOS, we set our compass at 2 MOA, which should reach the LOS (bull) at the high point and draw a circle around this point. Refer to Dave's lower circle in his picture, that's it there, your POI at any given cant angle.


POP QUIZ. [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]

What happens to POI when we add more MOA to the vertical turret? I figure the BL "circle" is larger, so the amount of deflection MOA is increased also, and multiplied by the range it is set to rezero at?

Now, what's the formula to figure the deflection MOA per degree due to cant angle for a given range?

I'm talking to Jim right now about the odd numbers in RSI SL. Zero MOA deflection at 100 yards is not correct, and the first one with the very high deflection numbers is not either.

That's an informative Link, Dave.

One thing:

Notice in section 2.1 of the referenced web article the figure B representation. This can be thought of as a "near" zero representation if you discount the projectile path, examine only the Line-Of-Sight line. Cant the rifle 90 degrees to the side and the deflection goes to zero -0-. The "drop" still exists and the round will strike below the POA, "BUT it will be DIRECTLY BELOW the POA".

They don't consider you have 2 MOA dialed into the scope to compensate for that drop though, and "that's" where the deflection from cant comes from, they cannot discount it, unless the 2 MOA is taken "off" the turret, it exists and must be accounted for in deflection. Make sense?

Ric, You are RIGHT. [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img] The bore line pointing left or right of LOS is the key here. The more you dial, and the farther we shoot, the worse it all gets.
__________________
Brent Moffitt
Reply With Quote
  #81  
Old 03-08-2004, 11:42 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,369
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Brent & All

I'm going to bow out of this thread at this point as it's gone far beyond the initial intent.

Those bubble levels can really create a problem and should come with a warning!! [img]images/icons/wink.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #82  
Old 03-09-2004, 04:18 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Finland
Posts: 179
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Reply With Quote
  #83  
Old 03-09-2004, 05:20 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 2,369
Re: Bubble level for rifle

ROTFLMAO... You just had to do that didn't you. Made me break my word.

Still LOL [img]images/icons/smile.gif[/img]

I'm done and can't be lured back to this thread no matter the chuckle factor presented.
Reply With Quote
  #84  
Old 03-10-2004, 05:54 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Palmer, Alaska
Posts: 2,539
Re: Bubble level for rifle

Now that's flashy! [img]images/icons/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
Brent Moffitt
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Bubble level for rifle
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
gun, scope, bubble level .. dont look level?? bigsal5353 Long Range Hunting & Shooting 7 11-08-2012 08:58 PM
Replace Your Bubble Level With An Electronic One !!!! Les1580 PSE TAC 15/15i Crossbow Hunting Forum 0 06-23-2011 10:59 PM
Bubble level?? ergceo Long Range Hunting & Shooting 21 02-28-2010 08:51 AM
Frugal bubble level.. Jake in NC The Basics, Starting Out 0 04-14-2004 07:31 AM
Pictures of bubble level ... dwm Equipment Discussions 13 03-21-2004 04:59 PM

Current Poll
I currently have hunting preference points in the following states

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC