Long Range Hunting Online Magazine

Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Chatting and General Stuff > General Discussion

General Discussion Must wear red or OD green socks to participate. I can't see your socks, please be honest.


Army To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of The M855 Ammo

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-29-2008, 06:33 PM
Platinum Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,598
Army To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of The M855 Ammo

By JAY REEVES, Associated Press Writer

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. - The military is reviewing soldiers' complaints that their standard ammunition isn't powerful enough for the type of fighting required in Iraq and Afghanistan, the Army's highest-ranking officer said Thursday. But Gen. George W. Casey Jr., the Army chief of staff, said it was too soon to say whether the Pentagon will switch.

Current and former soldiers interviewed by The Associated Press said the military's M855 rifle rounds are not powerful enough for close-in fighting in cities and towns in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Speaking with reporters at a conference in Huntsville, Casey said leaders are constantly soliciting feedback from soldiers in the field and were aware of complaints about the M855 ammunition.

"To effectively prepare them we have to adapt as the enemy adapts, and that is some of the feedback we have gotten," Casey said. "We'll evaluate it quickly and then we'll decide how we want to proceed."

But Casey said it would be premature to say if the Pentagon will consider a different type of ammunition.

"I can't tell you exactly what we're going to do," he said.

The M855 rounds were designed decades ago to puncture the steel helmets of Soviet soldiers from hundreds of yards away. Some soldiers said that they are not large enough to stop an enemy immediately in close quarters.

Casey said the military has been evaluating its equipment and practices since the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

"Technology is pulling us, and what we're learning on the ground in Iraq and Afghanistan is pushing us," he said.

Chief of staff: Army reviewing complaints over bullets - Yahoo! News
range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
Reply With Quote
  •   #2  
    Unread 05-30-2008, 08:46 AM
    Silver Member
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Posts: 266
    I have seen enough video of our guy's using AK's in firefights to agree, it's time for something with a lot more thump.

    Teddy Rosevelt proved long ago the worth of, and need for larger caliber or at least heavier bullets for the type of fighting our guy's are doing now.

    Just my .0002
    Reply With Quote

    Unread 05-30-2008, 11:46 AM
    Platinum Member
    Join Date: Jul 2002
    Posts: 2,855
    Its not the the bullets weight or diameter thats the problem its the bullets desgine , like it was said these were desgined for old school open area battle fields , todays battel field is urban towns where long range maybe 50 yds and these little armor piercing rounds just poke tiny little holes in people at that range , if you could convience the bad guy to where level III bullet proof vest they would work alot better.
    i have't heard to many complaints about the 77gr OTM rounds that the SF guys get to use cause they expand alot better , but the down side it they don't punch through armor if thats needed.

    I have seen some footage of both men and enraged dogs shot with 55gr and 75gr TAP rounds from Hornady in every case it was instant stop with death very shortly after and in a couple case that was from a 10.5" barreld AR at more than 20yds.
    Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
    Molon Labe
    Reply With Quote
    Unread 05-30-2008, 03:08 PM
    Silver Member
    Join Date: May 2007
    Location: California
    Posts: 458
    Where's the 6.8mm Rem SPC? The Army has had that caliber available for over a year. Why don't they get the 6.8mm ARs in the field? Why are they still arguing about it?

    Maybe they should re-issue the M14 tanker rifles if they haven't sold 'em all to the Saudis or someone.:(
    Reply With Quote
    Unread 05-30-2008, 03:26 PM
    Platinum Member
    Join Date: Feb 2005
    Location: USA
    Posts: 2,598
    The Army has re-issued many M-14s as a matter of fact. It was the Special Forces Comunity that approache Rem to design a more effective round that would fit in the M-16 platform. The Army Brass seems unwilling to admit that a larger Diameter projectile will leave a larger wound thus making it more effective over a wider range of circumstances.
    range it,check the wind, dial in correction, aim and only one shot
    Reply With Quote
    Unread 05-30-2008, 03:55 PM
    Bronze Member
    Join Date: Jan 2008
    Location: half way between Buffalo,NY and Rochester,NY
    Posts: 60
    They need to use the green bullets that they use for training, I think it is a power instead of lead.
    Reply With Quote
    Unread 05-31-2008, 07:52 AM
    Platinum Member
    Join Date: Jul 2004
    Location: Texas
    Posts: 7,001
    This is what they need for urban warfare.

    AA-12: world's deadliest shotgun - Snotr

    Its called the aa12

    "PRESS ON"
    Reply With Quote


    Thread Tools
    Display Modes

    Similar Threads for: Army To Evaluate The Effectiveness Of The M855 Ammo
    Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
    M855A1 New Kit up for Army Ammo 436 Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 3 05-22-2011 10:36 PM
    Ballistic software and effectiveness 7mmstwuser Long Range Hunting & Shooting 10 01-14-2009 03:41 PM
    Terminal effectiveness Gary Morgan Varmint Hunting 16 11-23-2007 09:32 AM
    Leica 1200 effectiveness winmagman Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 8 12-06-2004 04:49 PM
    OK Evaluate these..Be honest good or bad.. *WyoWhisper* Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics 21 02-29-2004 09:53 PM

    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 PM.

    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC