close
Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics

Reply

Why no 270-08 ?

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #22  
Unread 08-06-2013, 11:49 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ND
Posts: 2,801
Re: Why no 270-08 ?

Now the only person needed to round out this 270 shooters club is Mr royinidaho himself.
__________________

I'm 18
"Firearms are second only to the Constitution in importance; they are the peoples' liberty's teeth."
~George Washington

"The only advantage a light rifle has is weight, all other advantages go to the heavy rifle."
~ JE Custom

Biggest fail of 2014 so far... http://www.longrangehunting.com/foru...ea-ftf-128972/

My guess on W3P .308 230 Grain Bullet: G1 .740-.755
Reply With Quote
  •   #23  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 12:02 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2009
    Location: LaPine Or.
    Posts: 2,536
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by barnesuser28 View Post
    Now the only person needed to round out this 270 shooters club is Mr royinidaho himself.
    Amen!
    He's the closest thing we've got to Jack O'Conner himself, & alot funnier
    Roy Rocks!

    PS
    Riley, I like the heck out of you, & you are always helpfull, & are an incredibly knowledgeable gun guy, but judging by the YouTube thingy's in your "signature" you have Terrible taste in music hahahaha. Just sayin' :-)
    __________________
    "Its not Rocket Surgery.....'
    GOD,GUNS,&GUTTS MADE AMERICA, LETS KEEP ALL 3!winmag

    "I have No idea why that cop made me ride in the back seat, when I Clearly called Shotgun!"
    Reply With Quote

      #24  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 05:47 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2005
    Location: Tucson Az
    Posts: 1,983
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    The 270-308 actually has a slightly improved version. It is called the 270 Redding. From what I have read Richard Beebe, president of Redding Reloading back in the 50s was one of the proponents of this wildcat and may have named it. It was first made when the 308 came out. It has a 30 degree shoulder and the article below states it duplicates the 270 win in performance.

    The July-Aug 1990 handload magazine has an article on the 270 Redding.

    Butch Jenson son of Bob Jensen (Jensen's Custom Ammo in Tucson) had one back in the 70s, might still have it. I remember Butch raving about its virtues in a lightweight SA rifle for coues wt hunting.

    Here is a link with some load data at bottom:

    Adventures With The .270 Redding. - Free Online Library

    Author's name is not shown. He used a 22 inch barrel and got 3025 fps with a 130 Speer grand slam and 46 gr of Varget.


    If I were making this wildcat I'd consider the 270 Redding over the 7mm-08. There are dies available as well as reamers.
    Reply With Quote
      #25  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 07:25 AM
    Platinum Member
     
    Join Date: May 2012
    Posts: 4,108
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    the author is Charles E. Petty

    Adventures With The .270 Redding. - Free Online Library
    Reply With Quote
      #26  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 08:20 AM
    Silver Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2007
    Location: SW Wisconsin
    Posts: 225
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    If you're truly looking for light recoil for smaller/younger shooters with performance good enough for elk (better than 243) then it's right at 6.5mm. 6.5X47 Lapua, 6.5 Creed, 260 Rem. Couldn't get a better round for a young shooter. Can you tell I'm jaded on the .270??? Can't stand it and never could. Only rifle I ever built I couldn't get to shoot...to be honest it was completely the barrel, but it just left a sour taste. Never built another one and stored all my 270 bullets. Anyone interested I have a box somewhere with dies, brass and bullets (lots of bullets) that I can guarentee I will never use.
    Reply With Quote
      #27  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 08:37 AM
    Bronze Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Posts: 80
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    I shoot a 270-08AI, it is hands down my favorite mid range cartridge.
    In my opinion it's the best thing you can do with an 08 case.
    Reply With Quote
      #28  
    Unread 08-07-2013, 08:44 AM
    Gold Member
     
    Join Date: Dec 2010
    Location: SD
    Posts: 546
    Re: Why no 270-08 ?

    I think the 270-08 would be a great cartridge.

    A nice little Model 7 or M70 with a skinny little barrel would be a great antelope and deer carry rifle and would have plenty of power for shooting as far as you would want to with a little light rifle.

    The bullet selection has some stellar performers including the 130CH Berger, 140HPBT Sierra, 150NPT, and 165 Matrix and they can be currently found on the shelves. Something that is an advantage these days.

    Brass is plentiful and it takes some powder that is readily available also these days. 4007sc, 2000mr, etc can be found on the shelves.

    As stated the 7-08, 260, and 6.5x284 have it surrounded pretty well but what the heck, if you want one build it!
    Reply With Quote
    Reply

    Bookmarks

    Thread Tools
    Display Modes



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:15 PM.


    Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
    Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
    All content ©2010-2015 Long Range Hunting, LLC