Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics

Rifles, Bullets, Barrels & Ballistics Applied Ballistics


Reply

Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #8  
Old 12-17-2013, 08:55 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: SW Alaska
Posts: 173
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

I too am a big ultra mag fan. My 300 shoots bug holes and does very well at 1000 yards and more with the 240 SMK's. I like the RUM line so much that I am in the process of building a .416-.375 RUM for my guiding companion. Although I believe that the minimum length of barrel used for the 7, 300, and 338 should be 28" or more to see what the cartridge is truly capable of.

Reuben
__________________
Confucius say, "He who go to bed with itchy butt, wake up to smelly finga."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-17-2013, 09:28 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Alabama
Posts: 6,296
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

Quote:
Originally Posted by MontanaRifleman View Post
Now we all know you like your STW but barrel life is not going to be all that much better than the RUM, all else being equal such as pressure/heat and rate of fire.

When it comes to efficiency, anytime you climb the case volume ladder in the same cal, you're gonna loose efficiency. A 7-08 is going to be more efficient than a 284 Win which is going to be more efficient than a 7 RM which is going to be more efficient than the STW which is going to be more efficient than the RUM. With the 7 RUM, you do have a very overbore case which restricts the number of good powders that will work well in it but RL33 and RL50 should do very well.

Same goes with the 30 cals. I would agree that the 300 RUM is a little more efficient than the 7 RUM because it is not as overbore, but IMO the 7 RUM is a great cartridge to push the 180 and 195 size bullets. It takes more powder but that's the price you pay.
Yep, those who have never owned or shot an STW will never truly understand its greatness. It truly is King Author's Excaliber with the 168+ bullets. Mine shines thumping the 180's downrange.

Based on barrel life of several others on here, it appears you could get significantly better if you take extreme care of the bore and throat.
__________________
"I'm just a peckerwood who lives in the hills with too many guns..." - Bob Lee Swagger

"Give me a minute...I'm good. Give me an hour...I'm great. Give me 6 months...And I'm unbeatable." - Col. Hannibal Smith

Ignore everything I say, because I have a reading comprehension and memory problem...

Quote:
Originally Posted by WildRose View Post
The 284 is to the STW what a tricycle is to a Ninja.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-17-2013, 09:39 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 127
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deerhntr71 View Post
Are the 7mm Rum and 300 Rum worth the extra cost and recoil, or are the 7mm Rem and the 300 Win just as good if not better choices? Is the 7mm Rum dying off and a round to stay away from? If a person goes with a Rum, is the 300 Rum the better choice?
As others have asked, what do you need/want it for? The mission drives the equipment!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-17-2013, 09:48 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: N.D.
Posts: 3,141
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

Quote:
Originally Posted by MudRunner2005 View Post
Yep, those who have never owned or shot an STW will never truly understand its greatness. It truly is King Author's Excaliber with the 168+ bullets. Mine shines thumping the 180's downrange.

Based on barrel life of several others on here, it appears you could get significantly better if you take extreme care of the bore and throat.
I've got 500 or more shots on my current 7stw with zero visible throat wear. 400 of those shots are documented on targets in my shop. My rifle was bought used a year and a half ago. My 7rum was tired to the point accuracy was falling off in just over two years and 600 shots.
It's all how you flog these beasts; I had a bit to much bench time on the 7rum for the caliber it is. As a comparison, I'd hazard a low guess of 1400+ rounds (likely more) on my former stw and the last group fired with her was .4" at 100 yards. The rifling origin was shallow but she still shot well. Both my current stw and my old 7rum wore blued barrels, and the old stw was a sendero sf.

Your use dictates what you'll need. If you aren't needing the extra power, go with the 300win, etc.. If you need to step up, the 300rum is a heck of a cal..

I just picked up a lh stainless 7rum with unknown round count. I can still see the milling marks in the origin, which tells me it's under 100 rounds or so. I'll be sure to say when I fry this pipe out as I'll be looking at a replacement barrel. I'm guessing I'll get 500-800 rounds from her depending on the thrashing I give it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-17-2013, 10:31 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 1,349
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

For me it's a belted vs non-belted.

I have one belted and don't want any more.

Barrel burners, yup, all of them. Some more than others. Nature of the beast.

The belted mags are old technology.

Just kidding...
__________________
Fred Seaman
“Ask, Listen, Learn, Grow”
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-18-2013, 01:23 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The rifle range, or archery range or behind the computer in Alaska
Posts: 3,586
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

It never ceases to amaze me the amount of shooters that say how many rounds they have down their 300 and 7mm rums and are still shooting lights out. I must have the worst luck with barrel longevity. After two 300 rum barrels, you couldn't pay me to own another rum other than the 338 rum.

After my experiences with rum based calibers, I'm more than happy with the 300 win mag. If you run 208-230 grain pills inside of 1300 yards there is no real benefit to the rum. Sure it will hit harder and drift less but not enough to make it worth torched barrels. Hell by the time you work up loads and get to know its quirks it's time for a new one. If that floats your boat go for it.

Paper ballistics are always exciting. Heck running 140 VLDs at 4000 feet per second on the calculator is a lot of fun but replacing barrels every 100 rounds to meet the excitement in real life puts a sour taste in my mouth. Kind of like cotton candy. It tastes so good but it disappears in record time and all you're left with is rotten teeth and a stomach ache.
__________________
__________________
Long range shooting is a process that ends with a result. Once you start to focus on the result (how bad your last shot was, how big the group is going to be, what your buck will score, what your match score is, what place you are in...) then you loose the capacity to focus on the process.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-18-2013, 03:06 AM
ivo ivo is offline
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Alberta
Posts: 70
Re: Ultra Mags vs Rem Mag and Win Mag

This tread is exactly what I've been looking for. I am planning another build, this time for a "one gun long range hunter". I already have a 6 SLR, 260AI and 7WSM so I figure a .30 cal is the next logical choice. I was leaning toward the 300 RUM anyway, this thread just confirmed it.

Thanks for the info and opinions fellas!
__________________
Life is short... Lets go kill something
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC