Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-05-2005, 12:24 AM
dsw dsw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5
Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)

Guys,

I have a 1992 Weatherby Fibermark in a 300 Wby Mag. I began wondering what torque value this stock should be set at when I later purchased an Weatherby Accumark and the enclosed domcumentation's recommended value was 65 in/lbs.

I called Weatherby customer support as well as sending an email to McMillan. No response from McMillan after 2 weeks, but I did get through to a Weatherby rep. He said it shouldn't be nowhere near 65 in/lbs., but couldn't give me a torques value. (What feels snug.) That answer sucked, but I knew there was no use continuing the conversation.

Has anyone experimented with the torque value on one of the early fiberglass stocks? The Fibermark has a #2 contour and I start with MOA, but begins stringing after the first 3 shots heat the barrel up. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I do have a Seekonk variable torque wrench. Any suggestions would be much appreciated!

DSW
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-05-2005, 10:21 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Sask. Canada
Posts: 2,410
Re: Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)

I suggest starting at 45 in/pounds. I was tightening a McMillan stocked Rem. 700 to 65 and was not happy with the accuracy even tho the stock was bedded. Went to 45 and the rifle shoots great. I expect that 65 is the optimum for the big tactical stocks with pillars, plus it happens to be the same torque value suggested for the side nuts on Badgers and MK4 rings. Might be why 65 is suggested so commonly.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-05-2005, 12:01 PM
dsw dsw is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5
Re: Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)

Thanks Ian! I'll start with 45 in/lbs. as you suggest. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

DSW
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-19-2012, 05:02 PM
Official Sponsor of LRH
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 105
Re: Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)

I am sorry you didn't get a response form McMillan. That is not normally how we work. As was suggested you would be well served to start at 45 in lbs, with no need to exceed 55. The material in stock is strong enough that you don't need to worry about crushing the receiver area.
__________________
Kelly D. McMillan
http://www.mcmillanusa.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Torque Value on a 1992 McMillan Fiberglass Stock, (No pillars)
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I bed a Mcmillan fiberglass stock? elmerdeer Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 10 07-27-2012 11:02 PM
McMillan Rifle Stocks at the LRH Store bookworm Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 9 01-19-2012 07:08 PM
WTB: Shehane Tracker McMillan Fiberglass stock or similar - BAT VR Wolfdawg Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 0 08-02-2011 09:48 AM
aluminum pillars on laminate stock???? cookjp Long Range Hunting & Shooting 6 07-16-2009 09:13 AM
MCMILLAN FIBERGLASS STOCK Rem 700 LA BDL continentaldrifter Gun Parts - Stocks, Barrels, Actions, etc. 2 01-27-2009 01:17 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 32.42%
83 Votes
NO - 50.00%
128 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 17.58%
45 Votes
Total Votes: 256
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC