Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Swift Scirocco VS Nosler Accubond & Elk

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2008, 03:37 PM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Rock Hill, SC
Posts: 30
Swift Scirocco VS Nosler Accubond & Elk

Son in law is getting ready for a NM Elk hunt the end of Oct. He has been reolading a number of 180 grain 300 WM bullets and testing them. Several have commented that the performance of the Accubond has not been consistent .... that they come apart too easily in the large animals. Neither he nor I have large animal field experience with any of them yet. He would love to have input and comments as well as experiences of board members who have used some of the 300 WM bullets on large animals. How does the Scirocco and Accubond perform. Which would you perfer and why? Any other comments on the subject? Thanks for any and all input
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2008, 03:50 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Helena, AR
Posts: 271
The only experience that I have is with the scirocco. I shot a 250# whitetail last year a 75 yards with the 180 gr out the a 30-378. The bullet seemed to perform well, breaking both shoulders and exiting the body. I assume that the bullet held together because I did not any extra exit holes or other evidence of a failure.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2008, 04:22 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,454
Quote:
Originally Posted by 270fan View Post
Son in law is getting ready for a NM Elk hunt the end of Oct. He has been reolading a number of 180 grain 300 WM bullets and testing them. Several have commented that the performance of the Accubond has not been consistent .... that they come apart too easily in the large animals. Neither he nor I have large animal field experience with any of them yet. He would love to have input and comments as well as experiences of board members who have used some of the 300 WM bullets on large animals. How does the Scirocco and Accubond perform. Which would you perfer and why? Any other comments on the subject? Thanks for any and all input

Several years ago I talked to Bill Hober (president of Swift) and asked about using the Scirocco on elk. As I recall, his response was that an elk was the largest animal it should be used on and the feeling was that it really wasn't built for elk, but smaller critters. At longer ranges where it's slowed down a bit, it might be a better choice. I haven't shot the Scirocco, but my general understanding is that the Accubond will tend to hold together better. There is now the Scirocco II, I believe, and this redesigned bullet sounds like it may perform better on larger game than it's predecessor. Call Bill and ask him. Probably the better choice out of a factory 300 WM would be the 200 Accubond (AB) for elk. That should hold together better and hit with more authority if the powder is well matched to the bullet and rifle than either of the 180's mentioned. Good luck!
__________________
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Genesis 1:1

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God?" Thomas Jefferson - Notes on the State of Virginia

www.wildsidesystems.com - Shelter for Your WildSide - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tYwgo...&feature=g-upl
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2008, 06:51 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Southern Wisconsin
Posts: 1,305
270fan,

I have not shot the Scirocco in the WM, but have and still do use the 200 gr AB. Of the half dozen or so I've recovered they all performed as advertised, 60%-70% weight retention, perfect little mushrooms. I have not been fortunate enough to run any through an elk, but have put them through both front shoulders of some good sized whitetails (175lbs-225lbs) always get good results.

The Scirocco experience I do have is with the 6.5mm 130 gr Scirocco II, not the original. I've used it and the 130 gr AB out of a 6.5 wssm (.260ish velocities). I found the Scirocco II a little harder to get to shoot accurately but it seems to be a tougher bullet construction wise. I've only recovered 2 Sciroccos, but both retained over 85% of their original weight, both were spine shots. The one 130 gr AB I've recovered performed just like its big brother in the WM 60-70% weight retention.

I know its not exactly what you asked for, but hopefully its a little more food for thought.

Chris
__________________
Ignorance can be treated with education, sadly there is no cure for stupidity.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2008, 09:28 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hermiston, Oregon
Posts: 2,005
I 2nd the 200g AB. Will offer you a lot more then the 180g like more penetration and a bigger hole, with added knockdown power! I killed a few spike elk and cows with them out of my 300 RUM and all exited and performed flawlessly from 75-525 yards. Weight retention in wet newspaper was usually 65%. Sorry, I never did find a bullet in an animal, I figure there still flying around somewhere.

Every report I've seen and read says the scirocco will hold up better then the AB. I have no experience with the scirocco as they are way to expensive for me for as much shooting as I like to do. I like to practice with the bullet I use to hunt to better familiarize myself with the rifle/load. It always cracks me up when people say to practice with a cheaper bullet then when you go hunting, use the more expensive one. Well did you practice with those expensive ones all year long and know what there going to do at certain range and winds?? If you did great, if not I dont advise it.

I would pick the bullet that shoots best out of his rifle and be totally happy. I guarantee both 180g bullets will slam any elk that walks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2008, 12:27 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,377
I have undying faith in Accubonds. They flat do what they say they will. My hunting partner shoots Scirrocos in is 300 ultramag. They seem good bullets. They DO come apart at close range at ultramag velocities. They still penetrate and the animal still falls over. I think you'll have to look long and hard to find the difference in terminal perfomance between
these two. Which is easier to get, cheaper, and most importantly the most accurate? That's how I'd pick.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-28-2008, 12:49 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 222
Whichever shoots the best is the best one to use. You're using a 300 Winchester with 180s so you're going fast but not super fast and either of these bullets will smash through an elk like a freight train. We've been killing elk and deer and caribou with Sciroccos and Scirocco IIs for years and haven't seen one come apart yet (~20 to 30 critters) although many times they pass through. I've no doubt that the Accubonds will perform exactly the same way. I've had Sciroccos mushroom nicely and penetrate through an elk at 750 yds out of a 7WSM and my buddy smashed through both front shoulders of a big bull at 40 yards with a 300 WM.

As for Sciroccos being expensive, they cost about $0.05 per bullet more than Accubonds. A box is much more expensive but Sciroccos are packaged in boxes of 100. So when you see a box costs $52, that's $0.52 per bullet compared to Accubonds costing $23 per box, that's only for 50 so they're $0.46 per bullet.

Anyway, you've chosen 2 of the best. You can't go wrong with either of them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Swift Scirocco VS Nosler Accubond & Elk
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
6.5 Swift Scirocco? ovastafford Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 6 08-31-2012 02:42 AM
.30 Cal Swift Scirocco 180 Gr Cordell Reloading Equipment and Components 0 11-22-2009 02:19 PM
Nosler Accubond vs. Swift Scirocco: Which Would You Choose? DougD Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 11 10-20-2006 09:20 PM
Accubond or Swift Scirocco? william101 Reloading 32 10-02-2005 03:58 AM
Swift Scirocco Brown Dog Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 01-18-2004 04:10 PM

Current Poll
How Many Different Cartridges Do You Reload For?
ZERO, all factory ammo - 8.01%
351 Votes
1 - 2.78%
122 Votes
2 or 3 - 14.53%
637 Votes
4 or 5 - 20.35%
892 Votes
6 or 7 - 14.85%
651 Votes
8 or 9 - 8.67%
380 Votes
10 or more - 30.82%
1,351 Vote
Total Votes: 4,384
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC