Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

swarovski vs leica

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2008, 09:39 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Base of the Bluemountains aka Gods Country
Posts: 466
swarovski vs leica

How much better is the Swarovski than the leica
? Is it worth the extra money and just for your info the newcon 2000 is junk. Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2008, 10:15 PM
PUBLISHER
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,817
Re: swarovski vs leica

And the Newcon 2500 is junk.
__________________


Long Range Hunting Rifles

Long Range Rifles, LLC - Ready To Ship

Components and assembly by LRH Sponsors
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2008, 10:43 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: bismarck ND
Posts: 406
Re: swarovski vs leica

i have leica geovids and spotting scope, when i bought mine i took them both out and did glassing in low light and bright light. both glass perfpormed equal. IMO they are the 2 best glass in the world. my final decision was becase with the geovids i could look at my target through my binos and if i wanted to know the range i wouldne have to put down binos and pull out range finder and the switch again, you wont be disipointed...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-01-2008, 08:25 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 1,512
Re: swarovski vs leica

I have had a couple of Leica's and did not like their performance. A buddy of mine let me try the swarovski and I got rid of both my Leica's. Their performance was not even close to the swarovki's! The extra money was well worth it for me. I have no trouble ranging past 1000 yards with the swarovski.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-01-2008, 12:11 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 1,219
Re: swarovski vs leica

Just got my Leica 1200 crf and I like it for my inteded use. I can range deer at @700 almost anytime and it will definately range better when the sun isn't shining bright. I ranged tree lines at 1350 befor the sun really peaked over the horizon.

If I would do it over again, I'd really consider spending another 300 for the Swaro. I have never really used one, but from what I have read and heard, the swaro will range much much better than the leica in bright sun! The Nikon is cheaper and also ranges pretty comparably to the leica, but it has very poor low light optic quality compared to the leica or the swaro.
__________________
I used to re-load but now I "hand-load".
-- Well, at least I try --
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-01-2008, 03:24 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alaska
Posts: 3,335
Re: swarovski vs leica Laser RF

There is really no comparison. I've had both. Kept the Swaro and sold the Leica 1200.

The Leica would range out to about 1100 yds.
The Swaro will get out to about 1700 yds more reliably than the Leica gets out to 1100 yds.

Better glass in the Swaro also. I often use my Swaro as a monocular for spotting game when I don't want to pack the extra weight or bulk of binoculars.

By the way, both the Swaro and the Leica 1200 are better than a Bushnell 1500 Arc RF, based on my first hand experience.

Thanks for the tip on the Newcon. Glad I passed and didn't waste time and money on one. I had given them serious consideration at one time, until I looked them over at Shot Show 2007 in Orlando. Like looking through Coke bottle bottoms compared to the Swaro.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2008, 08:36 PM
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: N. Central Indiana
Posts: 550
Re: swarovski vs leica

I made that same decision earlier this year (Leica vs. Swarovski) and went with the Swarovski. 10x40 SLC and the rangefinder. The rangefinder works better than expected, Mid September noon sun @ 8500 feet it would range 1,000 Yds on a small pine tree consistently. Towards dusk on 2 different days I ranged a small pine tree at the end of the basin that I was watching. Both days with the tree in shadows, about 1 hr. before sunset it said 1902 Yds. That's consistency. I couldn't find anything farther away to range - that tree was on the ridge of the basin. That's holding it in my hands. It will range further (any type of light) when on a tripod than when holding it in your hands. My cousin has the 10x40 EL's and I couldn't tell the difference in the optics between the EL's and the SLC's looking thru them side-by-side.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: swarovski vs leica
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Swarovski vs. Leica? Elk Chaser Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 1 09-22-2010 02:42 PM
Swarovski & Leica gr8fuldoug Sponsors Marketplace 2 11-20-2009 02:45 PM
Swarovski,zeiss,&leica for sale!!!! vkbailey Optics For Sale 1 09-02-2009 01:04 AM
Leica -vs- Swarovski wildcat Long Range Scopes and Other Optics 11 02-23-2006 03:52 PM
Leica Swarovski for sale joelbiltz Guns For Sale 1 11-10-2005 12:28 PM

Current Poll
Do You Shoot Rifle Competition?
YES - 33.70%
759 Votes
NO - 66.30%
1,493 Vote
Total Votes: 2,252
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC