Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2003, 10:20 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 4,109
Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

First off no flames here, just honest request for info from anyone that has tested. Always willing to try something new that is better way of doing business.

I have seen/heard of two ways of measuring/sorting bullets.

1. Base to ogive
2. Length of bearing surface. Ogive to back of bearing surface.

My personal experience is that length of bearing surface has shown to be key factor in sorting boattail bullets.

I have seen two methods used for determining length of bearing surface.

1. Two stoney point comparators ($40)attached to dial caliper blade with ogive inserts put in them. The base comparator comes up to the back of the bearing surface and the front measures at the ogive. This gives you a standard measurement to use as "length of bearing surface".

2. Bill Shehane sells a tool ($275)that is built off a J & P Granite checker device, extra calibers are $75. His tool uses the granite checker, dial indicator with a caliber nose piece attached and a milled out base that the bullet sits in. Same thing gives you a length of bearing surface reading. Many LR and BR shooters swear this is a valid method and their testing supports that. I just bought the J & P tool ($50) and having gunsmith make the base and nose pieces for my calibers.

Not sure why you would measure length of a boatail that does not contact a case neck or barrel as the base to ogive method uses. Now if it is a flat base bullet, then by all means measure that.

What is purpose of measuring length of a boattail that touches nothing? Bullet seats off the ogive so seating depth will not be effected.

What does this method show you that is more accurate than length of bearing surface?

BH
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2003, 11:16 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Re: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

Bounty,

I just had a conversation at the club about this very subject and between my own findings and the findings of the person I talked with, I'd say, weigh the bullets and make sure they are somewhere close to what they should be and shoot em.
__________________
If you have something that you disassemble and reassemble enough times, sooner or later, you'll have two!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-17-2003, 01:04 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Fredericksburg VA
Posts: 4,109
Re: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

Used to believe that myself, but I have proven that after weighing into lots if you sort by length of bearing surface, groups will smaller. Not so much large difference with custom bullets like JLK and Berger, but a marked reduction in groups with Sierras. In fact, I have found the the sorting by length of bearing surface is more important than sorting by weight. Tried it both ways. Someone else may test and find different.

Just heard other guys saying, sort by base to ogive. that makes no sense to me and just wondering what difference measuring something that touches nothing(case neck or barrel lands) has based on their testing.

BH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-17-2003, 07:43 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 374
Re: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

I'd bet they mean boattail to ogive like what you're thinking. The base to ogive is meaningless. To "Accurately" measure them would be pretty difficult.

I sorted and found 15 berger bullets for my last match to .000025" (25 millionths). They shot all over hell so I guess I have bigger issues than bullet size!
__________________
If you have something that you disassemble and reassemble enough times, sooner or later, you'll have two!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2003, 02:17 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 17
Re: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

Greg Siegmund, maker of the Clinch River bullets that are catching fire with the long range crowd is a big proponent of sorting by "wheel base" as he calls the bearing surface. Says it makes a measurable difference on the target.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-06-2003, 10:55 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: McNeal, AZ
Posts: 368
Re: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.

Is it worth the time to sort by both weight and bearing surface? Or would I be better off just sorting by length of the bearing surface, and not worry if there is a couple of tenths difference in weight?
__________________
If I can kill that coyote from here, Will you walk out to get him?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Sorting bullets: Base to ogive vs length of bearing surface.
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bullet Bearing Surface Length Question(s) royinidaho Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 18 07-07-2013 08:07 AM
**SPF** FS - Hand Swaged 6mm Benchrest bullets, 7 ogive flat-base laver Reloading Equipment and Components 1 08-29-2011 05:16 PM
Bearing surface length? txsendero Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 3 12-23-2009 06:58 PM
Bearing Surface Length Measurement Question royinidaho Reloading 14 12-16-2006 03:09 PM
Bearing Surface Length Consistency and How anal to get? royinidaho Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics 1 10-16-2005 01:15 PM

Current Poll
Do You Shoot Rifle Competition?
YES - 33.67%
764 Votes
NO - 66.33%
1,505 Vote
Total Votes: 2,269
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC