Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-08-2013, 08:46 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

Curious of a few things:
1. Stainless Savages and accuracy vs standard steel
2. 16 vs other models (say 10, 11, 12, and the 110, 111). I don't care about pretty so much and am not interested in paying for anything but function out of a deer rifle / target gun.

I'm considering a trade of a $350 - $400 gun for an older 16. It seems like the 10, 11, 110, 111 sells used for $450 tops around here and about $100 less if you watch. I have no idea what the 16's sell for used or how sought after they are so I'm curious on a price check.

3. This one is in 270 WSM. I did some quick reading and found reports of one guy not being able to work a good load up for his Savage 16 WSM. I don't know if this is a common problem or just one guy's experience. I'd honestly prefer .308 since it's more common and easier to get brass for. I'll be using it for deer and usually 500 yds or less. But groups on papaer are important or I wouldn't be looking a Savage. Half the fun of shooting is getting good groups.

Thanks for any thoughts!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-08-2013, 09:01 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,271
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

I have 3 Savages and have been around quite a few others. I have not seen one yet that did not shoot lights out. Defining lights out is .5 MOA and less for me. I personally don't consider a rifle accurate until this level is achieved and it should be with hand loads IMO.

So, my model 116 in 6.5-284 has a SS 24" varmint countour with flutes. With my hand loads I have achieved .25 MOA. I normally shoot 200 yards for a zero and this rifle has shot many .25MOA groups. I decided to try a 100 yard zero, for easy re-zeroing and checks, and it was shooting groups of ragged 1 hole to holes touching and cutting each other. That is good enough for me and stock rifle. For LR work I try and find rocks that fit 1 MOA in my scope. I know this is not precision shooting but I have measured impacts on rocks several times and I am doing my job the rifle seems to easily shoot .5MOA out to 1300 yards. Beyond that I have not done so well. Most of the group past that have been 1 to 1.5 moa. I am guessing that is all me.

My friend has a new model 12 LRP, I think it is model 12, in a 260 Remington. That rifle is heavy as hell, but it shoots very well. It is 1moa with factory rounds and easily .5 or less with hand loads.

I just don't think you can really go wrong with the savages. They are not pretty and smooth like the Sako, Tikka, and Rems but they shoot.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-08-2013, 09:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

Any advantages or disadvantages with the Stainless? Sounds like you've had good results from the stainless.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-08-2013, 10:44 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,271
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

Well, I am no expert but I can not see a disadvantage with the SS. For a hunting rifle this is the only way to go and most all of the high end hunting rifles are stainless. It is just an easy metal to maintain. However, if you service a blued metal it will be fine too. It really depends on the time you spend servicing the rifle. I prefer stainless and I have both metals in various rifles. Accuracy wise I am not a bench shooter so if I can get .5 or less I am happy and I will choose the SS for the fact I don't have to mess with servicing it every time I go out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-08-2013, 11:45 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

My only complaint with the trade is the cartridge and that it's an older model. I'm not too sure about 270 WSM and also reloading for it. I read one bad story about not being able to get a good load for the 270wsm in a model 16 Savage, I realize that's only one story so credibility may be questioned any time something's based on one case, but it sounded like it was from an experienced reloader. I'd like to hear a little more.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:07 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 1,271
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

Well, I see experienced folks on here asking questions all the time about things they have overlooked etc. I thought I was experienced as well but I have been schooled several times this past year by having to think differently about my approach. My point is that I was being a stubborn old bastage about things I thought I knew. I was wrong.

I don't think the 270WSM has anything to do with the accuracy. It could have been the rifle, could have the reloader, could have been?? but I really do not believe there is some fundamental flaw with the accuracy of the 270 WSM. In fact, I would venture to guess that is one heck of cartridge.

You might just ask the forum about the 270 WSM experiences, my guess, you will get a lot of positive feedback.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-08-2013, 12:25 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 22
Re: Savage 16 (and stainless) accuracy vs the other models

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrentM View Post
Well, I see experienced folks on here asking questions all the time about things they have overlooked etc. I thought I was experienced as well but I have been schooled several times this past year by having to think differently about my approach. My point is that I was being a stubborn old bastage about things I thought I knew. I was wrong.

I don't think the 270WSM has anything to do with the accuracy. It could have been the rifle, could have the reloader, could have been?? but I really do not believe there is some fundamental flaw with the accuracy of the 270 WSM. In fact, I would venture to guess that is one heck of cartridge.

You might just ask the forum about the 270 WSM experiences, my guess, you will get a lot of positive feedback.
Lol on the stubborn old bastage comment and great idea on asking specifically about 270WSM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Current Poll
Are you on Facebook?
Yes - 46.38%
1,113 Vote
No - 19.54%
469 Votes
No, but I may join - 1.75%
42 Votes
No way, are you kidding? - 36.08%
866 Votes
Total Votes: 2,400
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC