Long Range Hunting Online Magazine


Go Back   Long Range Hunting Online Magazine > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics


Reply

Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-06-2010, 06:08 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NORTHEAST PA.
Posts: 225
Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

my local shooting club had a Savage /nikon/ hornady day where those manufacturer's brought in some things for us to play with.
i got to handle and shoot the 110 BA. they had both the .338 lapua and .300 win mag versions, unfortunately the .338 ammo did not come, so they put out a .300 win mag.
the "wow" factor was there:

as we had to rotate shooters, my trigger time was sporatic, and the bipod they had on it sucked, i later removed it and shot off a box of ammo

also i don't know who they had sighting in the rifles (stevie wonder?), but it took a few relays to get it in. for some reason, it just didn't shoot to my expectation. they were feeding it hornady 180 gr sst, perhaps the load didn't agree with it, or perhaps it was the less than perfect rests we had to use. it just (in my opinion) didn't shoot like a $2,000 + gun should. we have the oppurtunity to sign out the rifles over the next month and use them, so i'll have to revisit the accuraccy thing, as it bothers me as a huge savage fan not to be able to touch 'em at 100 yards. hopefully the .338 ammo will be in for that. i thought it was me having an off day, however i was managing to get the other rifles available - mdl 12 palma, mdl 11 long range hunter, mdl 12 varminter, to around 2" or less at at 200 yards, and the mkii tr .22 to touch at 50 yards - that well it wasn't me having an off day.
felt recoil was really low, felt considerably less than the .308's i shot just minutes before and after, thanks to the 15.75 lb. empty weight and the very well designed brake. the whole rifle was a solid as you can get - no rattles, flexes, noises, squeeks, etc. note that the brake is recessed and point upward, with a "shelf" halfway down. muzzle blast has no where else to go but where designed to go.

the scope was a nikon monarch 6-24x 50mm obj. had a target dot reticle (mildot would be better, but this was a freebie shooter, so why complain?). it had burris medium rings and still had some clearance.

the side rails IMHO are useless, but the top pic rail had enough length for any NV add ons and was done well.
the mid section was all business...

bolt handle was just the right length and width, the magazine release was large and easy to manipulate (push forward for release). the "panther" style pistol grip was always a favorite of mine, and the whole mid section had a good AR-15 feel to it, but on the other hand, felt a little strange on this type of platform.



more on below post (picture heavy)...
__________________
...that's what i like about toe tags; one size fits all...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-06-2010, 06:11 AM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NORTHEAST PA.
Posts: 225
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

....continued from above.

the 3 position safety is where it should be - on the tang. i do prefer the old "lump" button savage safety compared to the new one, as the old one seemed easier to find by feel.

the bolt and magazine. the 6 round (.300 win mag, .338 is 5 round) magazine seemed a little "chimsey" to me, seemed it would be easy to damage or get out of shape. the bolt finish was nice, however the bolt face and lugs didn't hint to me that it was from anything else than an average savage .300 win mag. - not that being an average savage .300 win mag is a bad thing, just doesn' seem to be "upgraded" for a $2,000+ rifle.


the rear stock: nice on an AR, felt a little retarded on this. i appreciated the adjustable LOP and cheekpiece, however it was thin and seemed out of place. i would opt for a beefier rear stock or at least a beefier cheekpiece at least to trick myself to feel like i have a more comfortable stock under me. i don't know, it just seemed weird to have a stock used on CQB rifles on this. rode a rear bag horribly. just my opinion, will have to play with it more.

all in all i felt priviledge to fire this rifle, but at the same time a little let down with the performance and feel of it. i think i'd rather put $2,200 on a national match M-14 or a SOCOM.
again, i'm going to sign her out again sometime over the next month to see of some of the bad vibes i was getting subside. coming from a huge savage fan and shooter, this just seemed not to equal the hype, expense, and performance that is talked about. was it just me? i don't know. it has it's good points, and a few odd ones, in the end after experimenting more i may be dead wrong.
however, i would prefer a mcmillian, hs precision, or choate feel and comfort to it rather than the AR style setup. i left with the overall view that $2,000+ could be spent better on a rifle that fits the individual tastes better. once again perhaps it's just me.

as for today, it was like going to see your favorite band perform live in concert, then realize they stink abit when out of the studio. just feeling a little mixed, but as i said before, i believe i have to do some more shooting with it. but i do applaud savage for taking the jump with this and the other new models they have out there, and for listening to their customers.

UPDATE:

the club had to return the rifles as there was a whole bunch of BS to go through with the ATF to hold on to them, so i wan't able to shoot it again. however, i do feel priviliged to shoot it, but a little saddened that i wasn't able to pull the trigger with a better rest, set up, and no line behind me to see once in for all if the rifle was "all that" or if is was just the rests we were using.
__________________
...that's what i like about toe tags; one size fits all...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-06-2010, 07:23 PM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Blackfoot, Idaho
Posts: 8,090
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

Do I see Burris Signature rings (plastic inserts) on that rig?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-07-2010, 08:50 PM
Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NORTHEAST PA.
Posts: 225
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

yes they were, i don't know if the folks that "set up" the the rifle knew what exactly kind of trinkets they had to play with, i don't believe they really took advantage of the options they had at their disposal.

i think that led to the mixed feelings i had about the groups i was shooting, (as they were a little larger than i would have expected) i don't think they had everything "in sync" with each other.

at first i thought it was me, however i didn't have a problem doing touching holes with the other rifles they had to shoot @100 yds, and under 2" at 200yds.
__________________
...that's what i like about toe tags; one size fits all...
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2010, 12:34 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,538
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

Thanks for the review and pics. Sounds kinda odd about not having any 338 ammo...what's up with that?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2010, 01:27 AM
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: SW Montana
Posts: 4,457
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

Kinda like showing up to the prom with no date!!! Someone should have been ready for that and had a stash laid in ahead of time
__________________
High Fence, Low Fence, Stuck in the Fence, if I can Tag it and Eat it, it's Hunting!

"Pain is weakness leaving your body"
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-17-2010, 10:09 AM
Bronze Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Missouri
Posts: 30
Re: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review

I happen to own one of these weapons, so I would like to give you all my review after tinkering with various factory and handloads.



1.) I paid $1700 for mine-- certainly worth it compared to the M-14 National Match I bought several years ago, and have since sold due to its inability to reliably and accurately fire handloads of any length other than standard factory ammo.

2.) My scope and ring setup is a bit more, shall we say, "solid." Medium height Burris Tactical (6 screw rings) with a Leupold VX-III 8.5-25x LR/T on top.

3.) Accuracy was incredible for factory loads, even with the 180gr Hornady SST Super Performance (1.41" at 200yds) as you used in your testing. That being said, this weapon was not a big fan of 190gr Federal Gold Medal Match (SMK) with groups ranging from 1.9-2.2" at 200 yards. That's not horrible, but also not what I paid $1700 for-- therefore, I looked elsewhere.



Initial testing was done at 200 yards out of the prone with a 6-9" Adjustable Harris Bipod at the 6" setting. Further, I have tested multiple handloads out of this weapon. I intend to continue my accuracy testing in a few months when I get home from Afghanistan. In that, I will add 210gr SMK's to the mix, in addition to trying longer load lengths, probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 3.45-3.6" assuming they will fit the magazine. Hopefully I should be able to gain somewhere between 100 and 175fps out of the muzzle if my calculations are correct, after having added more powder. Lastly, I have tested this weapon out to 800 yards with the H100V 190 SMK and 200 NP loads listed below. Accuracy for the 190 was 6.34" from outside to outside, and with the 200NP was 7.21" outside to outside. These groups were measured with Cabela's electronic calipers, and are the average of 3 4-shot groups.



The loads below were shot at 200yds in manner described above while it was roughly 80 degrees (F) with a no-value wind (12-6 oclock at <5mph).

Bullet Type Pwd Amt Pwd Type Grp Sz (") MV ME
175SMK 67.5 H100V 0.789 2950 3377
175SMK 69.5 H100V 0.783 2975 3435
190SMK 63 H100V 1.55 2800 3303
190SMK 67.5 RE-19 1.241 2725 3129
200 Nos Part 65.5 H100V 0.769 2730 3305


Overall, I am very satisfied with my investment thus far. Recoil is nearly non-existent, accuracy is incredible, and the trigger, well it's just astounding how smooth and crisp it is-- Savage did shooterkind a service when designing the Accu-Trigger.


While I've done a great job touting Savage with the above review, be aware I am in NO WAY affiliated with Savage Arms-- I am a simple Marine grunt that loves putting lead down range. Any questions, please post them up here or PM me if you wish.



Last edited by USMC03Grunt; 10-17-2010 at 10:29 AM. Reason: Added a picture
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads for: Savage 110 BA .300 win mag review
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
700 VTR .308 Win review bowhunthard Equipment Discussions 20 12-29-2010 12:43 PM
Savage Factory Tour....a Review RoyB Gunsmithing 4 05-08-2010 03:19 AM
APS 6-284 Review Alucard Equipment Discussions 15 02-23-2009 09:22 AM
NAH Review Sasquatch General Discussion 4 05-24-2005 01:12 AM

Current Poll
Do you archery hunt for elk?
YES - 31.86%
65 Votes
NO - 51.96%
106 Votes
Not yet, but I plan to. - 16.18%
33 Votes
Total Votes: 204
You may not vote on this poll.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2010-2014 Long Range Hunting, LLC