LongRangeHunting.com



Go Back   LongRangeHunting.com > Rifles, Reloading, Optics, Equipment > Rifles, Bullets, Barrels and Ballistics
Home Forums Articles Product Reviews Outdoor News Outdoor Tips Rules & FAQ Member Map Register Mark Forums Read

Reply

revolutions per minute debate

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #22  
Old 04-22-2005, 09:20 AM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Potomac River
Posts: 3,452
Re: revolutions per minute debate

Longtooth

U misunderstand. This is not worry, it is boredom waiting on the weekend and it finally gets here and the turkeys are gobbling and the shad and stripers are in but it is now scheduled to rain all Saturday and Sunday. What else is there to do except replace leaky faucets and change the cat litter?
__________________
The Smokin Fur Rifle Club
Reply With Quote

  #23  
Old 04-22-2005, 09:45 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 126
Re: revolutions per minute debate

There are a lot of interesting concepts here, but the answer to GG's question is simple. The relative rate of spin starting at 1:8 is increasing downrange. Whether or not that is optimal re spin drift, mass imbalances etc, or whether it will remain stable through the transonic region is another issue.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-22-2005, 10:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 109
Re: revolutions per minute debate

Boredom That I understand. It has led me since semi retirering to do some very strange things. Take this weekend I will be seeing how large a spray pattern I can get on ground squirrels with a 17 rem and a 6X284 Maybe I'll study it at several different ranges, I may even try to figure out the revolutions of the bullet, but then maybe not.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-22-2005, 10:36 AM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,490
Re: revolutions per minute debate

[ QUOTE ]
The relative rate of spin starting at 1:8 is increasing downrange.

[/ QUOTE ]
But the RPMs are decreasing. [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
__________________
GRAVITY. It's not just a good idea. It's the LAW!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-22-2005, 03:07 PM
Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 41
Re: revolutions per minute debate

Ok, here is my thinking and it is probably flawed but here goes. Using the 3000'per sec. with the 1 in 8 twist rate. 3000'x12 = 36000" then divided by 8" = 4500 revolutions per second or 4500 revolutions at the 3000' mark.
Now the 4000' MV 4000'x12 = 48000 then divided by 8" = 6000 revolutions per second or 6000 revolutions at the 4000'mark. Now how many revolutions did the 4000'MV make at the 3000'mark? 3000 is 75% of 4000 so 6000 x .75 =4500 revolutions. They made the same amount of revolutions. This is all assuming the MV remained constant and drag or other forces are not acting on the spin of the projectile. Is there a professor in the house?
__________________
Speed kills
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-22-2005, 04:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 126
Re: revolutions per minute debate

Okiehunter,
All you are saying is that a 1:8 twist is a 1:8 twist regardless of velocity.
GG was asking what happens (not a vacuum trajectory) downrange, for example the "786th yard".
The answer is that the bullet will make MORE than 4 1/2 complete revolutions during that yard.
This is because the translational velocity decays much more quickly than angular. As 4ked pointed out, the actual RPM of spinning is decreasing, its just that the velocity is decreasing much faster. So the relative rate of spinning (eg 1:8 initial) is increasing down range.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-22-2005, 07:07 PM
Senior Member
Find Me on the Map
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Center of the state, WI
Posts: 655
Re: revolutions per minute debate

I'm far from obtaining my rocket science degree, so much of this sounds foriegn to me. The problem wasn't time it's the dam tuition cost. But I think I have some real world experience with this. Last Sunday I shot 16 porcipines, unfortunatly 3 were gut shot. This produces a spectacularly gruesome site. Porcipines are 60% guts and as they climb and hang on their guts are particularily suseptible to gravity. Well my friend was intrested in seeing the carnige up close. All shots were with a 22-250, ranges from 100-365 yards. And I'll be dammed if all those intestinese and tape worms didn't have about a 1 in 12 twist imparted on them! Call me crazy but I think I solved it! [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
__________________
Click on coyboy and check out my homepage, pic's of long range kills.
Jim
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Content Management Powered by vBadvanced CMPS
All content ©2009 LenBackus.net, LLC